The Coleman non-touchdown

[Royale with Cheese]

22 hours ago, Mat68 said:

The moment the second foot is down and the ball crosses the endzone it is a touchdown.  Coleman wasn’t going to the ground.  The “complete the catch” is not needed. The defender knocked it loose after those things took place.  On the 50 its not a catch in the endzone it’s a touchdown.  No second act is need because he scored. 

Then why wasn’t this a TD?

Wilson is across the goaline and lands two feet with control of the ball before Rapp annihilates him.

 

 

[Einstein]

[Mat68]

20 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Then why wasn’t this a TD?

Wilson is across the goaline and lands two feet with control of the ball before Rapp annihilates him.

 

 

Dont believe he got both feet down and didn't make a football move.  

 

11 minutes ago, Einstein said:

The Clip starts a bit late.  The beginning he has a foot down 1.  Body facing LOS.  Second foot down. Body face back of endzone.  2nd foot. Body now facing opposite direction football move.  After the second foot and Coleman facing the backline 29 forced the ball loose. Im disputing getting 2 feet down and getting his body upfield qualifies for a football move.  Coleman is facing the back of the endzone when the ball becomes loose. In my eyes thats 2 feet down and a football move.  He is in the end zone so the moment it happens play is over.  

[Einstein]

3 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

The Clip starts a bit late.  

 

Ball is still in the air when clip starts. May be tough to see though. 

That play was a big controversy when it happened.

[Royale with Cheese]

20 minutes ago, Mat68 said:

Dont believe he got both feet down and didn't make a football move.  

 

He did have two feet on the ground and it was secured when those two feet hit.

Why does he have to make a football move if he already possesses the ball with two feet in the endzone?

[zow2]

I feel like Keon is going to have many reviewable catches in his career,  mainly because he's specializes in these contested catches right by the sidelines. So they will always look at the feet,,, but the tiny little ball wobble while cradling it will also be micro-reviewed.  I hate that because in real time a lot of the NFL receivers make great boundary catches and you can't see anything with the naked eye. Then on replay the smallest bobble or repositioning of the ball while maintaining control of it is overturned.  I'm not a fan of that. 

[Mat68]

1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

He did have two feet on the ground and it was secured when those two feet hit.

Why does he have to make a football move if he already possesses the ball with two feet in the endzone?

These are nowhere close to similar plays. 

[SoCal Deek]

Consensus: NOBODY has any idea what a catch is anymore….including the NFL

[That's No Moon]

On 10/20/2024 at 9:06 PM, pigpen65 said:

Sometimes a challenge can only be for one particular aspect of a play and sometimes, like today, they can rust review a play and the officials can overturn any part of it they want. 

Once it's reviewed any part of the play that is normally reviewable is fair game.

 

Unless you're in Houston and a guy in a black jacket comes out of the stands. 

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Consensus: NOBODY has any idea what a catch is anymore….including the NFL

It's whatever they want it to be at a given moment. By design.

[Mat68]

Need to go back to the beginning.  Clear and obvious.  Using 4k still framing a .5 second portion of a play is wild. In real time real speed catch, no catch becomes much clearer.