Augie Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 minute ago, frostbitmic said: They'll package Garrett in a deal with Watson. How many firsts are they willing to send us to take Watson? Quote
frostbitmic Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 minute ago, Augie said: How many firsts are they willing to send us to take Watson? It would become permanent. Quote
Augie Posted October 16 Posted October 16 Just now, frostbitmic said: It would become permanent. That’s a tough one….. I seriously don’t know what I would do if I was a long standing Browns fan. You can point to a thousand little and medium things, but the one BIG thing is the owner. I give them credit for hanging in there. What a cesspool. 2 1 Quote
26TrapDraw Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: Wonder if it’s titans, rams, raiders, jags, giants or Carolina I think there's a decent chance it could be Jets, Pats, Fins, Steelers, Browns, Bengals, Ravens, Jags, titans , texans, Colts, Raiders, chargers, chiefs , broncos, cowboys giants ,eagles, commanders, bears, lions ,packers ,vikings ,falcons, saints ,bucs ,panthers ,cardinals, rams, niners ,seahawks. But don't quote me . 1 Quote
co_springs_billsfan Posted October 16 Posted October 16 4 hours ago, aristocrat said: Taysom Hill would be hilarious He's going to score four touchdowns against the broncos on Thursday, and then Sean Payton will trade a first round pick to get him on the broncos 1 Quote
aristocrat Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 minute ago, co_springs_billsfan said: He's going to score four touchdowns against the broncos on Thursday, and then Sean Payton will trade a first round pick to get him on the broncos He’s still out from the rib injury but he’s got a 17 mil cap hit next year. He’s made 62 mil so far in his career as a part time qb, part time te part time rb lol 1 1 Quote
GolfandBills Posted October 16 Posted October 16 A safety that can cover, defensive tackle who can help in the run game. Quote
That's No Moon Posted October 16 Posted October 16 4 hours ago, aristocrat said: Taysom Hill would be hilarious Exactly, a third TE we can refuse to give the ball to AND another gadget guy we can refuse to run gadgets with all wrapped up in the same person! Quote
aristocrat Posted October 17 Posted October 17 11 minutes ago, That's No Moon said: Exactly, a third TE we can refuse to give the ball to AND another gadget guy we can refuse to run gadgets with all wrapped up in the same person! Knox has a cap hit of 15 mil next year. Hil 17. I’d actually trade them straight up cause hill coming in when you need 2-3 hard yards would be so much fun. Guy is an animal. I’ve also had a few beers 1 1 Quote
co_springs_billsfan Posted October 17 Posted October 17 31 minutes ago, aristocrat said: He’s still out from the rib injury but he’s got a 17 mil cap hit next year. He’s made 62 mil so far in his career as a part time qb, part time te part time rb lol I guess that means Payton can get him for less Quote
Fan in Chicago Posted October 17 Posted October 17 3 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: In no particular order the needs are: boundary WR, S, space rating DT, backup QB, pass rush and kicker. I would put kicker after WR and safety. I get nightmares thinking about a scenario where Bass has to kick a GW field goal in the playoffs. 1 Quote
That's No Moon Posted October 17 Posted October 17 33 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Knox has a cap hit of 15 mil next year. Hil 17. I’d actually trade them straight up cause hill coming in when you need 2-3 hard yards would be so much fun. Guy is an animal. I’ve also had a few beers I think you missed my point. They don't use two TEs already. They don't use the gadget guy they got already. Why would swapping one TE we don't use for another we won't use be better? 1 Quote
Saint Doug Posted October 17 Posted October 17 3 hours ago, GASabresIUFan said: We need to acquire Josh Allen from the Jags so that we have a Josh Allen on both sides of the ball. His name is no longer Josh Allen. Quote
SCBills Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Listening to Beane talk and I’d put the odds of another move higher than 50% Trading for a Safety, after drafting a guy in the second round that they even tried trading up for would be a tough pill to swallow (I do recognize we’ve had big 2nd year jumps). I’d take it back for a guy like Baker though as he’s an actual difference maker. DL seems to be where it would make most sense though. Probably at DT, because I don’t see us making a massive move for a guy who would be better than Rousseau, Epenesa or Von… and if it’s just another rotational guy, what’s the point? 1 Quote
HOUSE Posted October 17 Posted October 17 6 hours ago, Hotdog water said: Wow, serious question flooded with sarcastic responses. No problem. Don't you hate that ?? Quote
Turbo44 Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Hyde would be a sneaky signing if he feels he can still play. Obviously knows the system and could start day 2 1 Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted October 17 Posted October 17 44 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said: I would put kicker after WR and safety. I get nightmares thinking about a scenario where Bass has to kick a GW field goal in the playoffs. Yeah, it’s high on the list of needs. I was trying not to rank them, just kind of listing areas where they could improve. Bass has lost his confidence and everyone but McDermott seems to have lost confidence in him. Hopefully it doesn’t burn the Bills. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.