Ethan in Cleveland Posted November 11 Posted November 11 53 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: Funny how MVS learned a new playbook in 2-weeks but local media is still making the injury excuse for Curtis Samuel. Sal Capaccio is telling you everyday about “trust” and “assignments”. The Bills swapped Valdez-Scantling who has made plays in the Super Bowl for Jalen Virgil. How does that look good on our FO or Coaching Staff? But hey, let’s keep 5 every season and bank on zero injuries. Why have a deep threat WR when you can have a FB??? 1 1 1 Quote
Chicken Boo Posted November 11 Posted November 11 MVS sucks. He has sucked and he still sucks. 1 game doesn't change that. 1 2 Quote
NewEra Posted November 11 Posted November 11 32 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: Why have a deep threat WR when you can have a FB??? He sucks man. 1 Quote
Old Coot Posted November 11 Posted November 11 On 10/15/2024 at 4:42 PM, Miyagi-Do Karate said: I can’t believe how poor the production has been from Samuel. Not defending the guy, but he's battling turf toe. That's an injury that significantly affects a player's ability to cut. 2 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted November 11 Posted November 11 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: MVS sucks. He has sucked and he still sucks. 1 game doesn't change that. Wrong. Clutch Playoff performer. Was not used properly here or given enough opportunity IMO Maybe the Saints will release him as a courtesy if they are eliminated. Then he'll either go to KC, GB or BUF again Edited November 11 by Warriorspikes51 1 Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 11 Posted November 11 57 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: MVS sucks. He has sucked and he still sucks. 1 game doesn't change that. This is where I'm at too Quote
DrPJax Posted November 12 Posted November 12 6 hours ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: This is where I'm at too I understand your point and agree , yet I can’t understand bringing up even less talented-guys who are never even going to get a target. The uses of certain players by this staff at times is just hard to grasp. Why bring mvs in at the original price , then cut him when you are making a playoff run for players with less talent and NO POST SEASON SUCCESS. At least he had a history of some legit playoff success. They have a history of under utilizing players at times , keeping them off the field for unknown reasons. They did it with the safety again this year as well. Cutting two FA ‘s signed who were expected to make impacts seems illogical to me. It’s a mistake by either signing them or cutting them , you can’t have it both ways and your process is flawed. You are signing guys who then never have enough talent to even touch the field? Just the fact mvs was capable to have a two td game is proof he can compete , yet he had zero productivity here despite being here all preseason / offseason. The stiffs they brought up did nothing but run motion. That’s not going to get you thru injury depleted times. The offense was really limited yesterday. I mean they won by 10 , after giving up a 10 point lead thanks to the d scoring , went down 13-10 at one point , done while getting 4 turnovers and a pick six! Hey A win is a win, but is the process a sustainable one that would work against good teams? Colts are something like the 31 st ranked team against the pass , yet Josh threw two ints against their substandard talent. Seems like there are times that players are held off the field for mystery or not well communicated reasons. Players who failed here are doing well after leaving like Poona ford / Tim settle. Add Diggs , mvs, edwards all to the list. It just seems like chaotic roster management rather than a logical strategy. If it happens once , understandable. Happening several times seems like an issue, and until they prove this process can win a SB, it’s fair to question Beanes moves. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.