YoloinOhio Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago He HATED Watson apparently. 5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Nephilim17 said: Does a comp pick only depend on what the player signs for, or what he was paid the last contract? Can someone offer a little more insight into the potential comp pick for Cooper? I read somewhere in the thread a 5th. Is that the ceiling or could it potentially be higher? 2 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: It’s based on the new deal that he signs … For some comparison… Gabe Davis new deal is $13m a year … and the talk is that the Bills will get a 4th …of course as we found out last year … until the NFL awards the picks no one can be really sure In the case of Cooper, being a 10 year veteran, it isn't just based on the contract he signs. In the comp pick formula, 10 year veterans do not exceed a 5th Round Pick in compensation if lost. So, yes, that is the ceiling and no, it cannot be higher. Edited 1 hour ago by BillsFanForever19 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: He HATED Watson apparently. Just judging from his presser he didn't strike me as the kind of guy who would cotton much to a sexual predator. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills6969 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago A #1 WR that isn’t a diva. This is refreshing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted 51 minutes ago Share Posted 51 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Billl said: If Buffalo signs Jerry Rice tomorrow, are you going to say he’s better than Cooper? No, but somebody will say he's better than Diggs 🫢 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted 51 minutes ago Share Posted 51 minutes ago (edited) Said he only had 2 choices for a number, but looking at the roster, I see 15, 16, 18, 81, 82, 83, and 87 were all available. Edited 51 minutes ago by Brand J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank Stare Posted 28 minutes ago Share Posted 28 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, Brand J said: Said he only had 2 choices for a number, but looking at the roster, I see 15, 16, 18, 81, 82, 83, and 87 were all available. Is 83 actually available these days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted 22 minutes ago Share Posted 22 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Billl said: Diggs’s current age has nothing to do with the question, though. Josh played with him in his absolute prime, so the comparison is 27 year old Stef who was a top 5 WR versus 30 year old Coop. Even when Cooper was in his prime, there was not one poster on this board who would have put Cooper on the same level as Diggs. Just looking at their Approximate Value ratings from Pro Football Reference, Cooper’s career best was 11. Diggs has ranged from 12-15 the past 5 seasons. Cooper has had a great career, and he’s going to help the Bills, but if he were currently better than prime Diggs, he’d have cost a whole lot more than $800k and a late third round pick. The bolded is just an outright abomination of a statement. Maybe you don’t remember Diggs prior to joining Josh. Or maybe you don’t remember Cooper very well. Cooper was absolutely seen as a better player by many, if not, his equal or on the same level. Diggs, playing without an elite QB, made zero pro bowls. Cooper, playing without an elite QB made 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted 20 minutes ago Share Posted 20 minutes ago 7 hours ago, Billl said: That’s a ridiculous hot-take. The best season of Cooper’s career would maybe be equal to the worst season Diggs had in Buffalo. Diggs was a first team All-pro in 2020 and second team in 2022. He was a top 5 WR in the league. In no universe is a 30 year old Amari Cooper better than that. I mean it's a pretty iffy argument to make what with the age difference when they got here but there is an argument to be made that Cooper does have 6 1000+ yard seasons with some pretty hit or miss QB play to Diggs 2 before getting here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted 13 minutes ago Share Posted 13 minutes ago 6 hours ago, HappyDays said: Come on man... There can't be any WR truthers left on here!! The debate is over. The group wasn't remotely good enough and Beane made the ONLY possible move to give this team any kind of chance. BTW 1st read percentage is compiled by PFF as part of the data package that real NFL teams pay thousands of dollars for. It isn't a fake stat just because you don't understand it. They're also very generous with how they assign a 1st read to a play - if 3 WRs are bunched to one side and the QB throws to any one of those WRs, they call that a 1st read throw even though technically it could have been the 2nd WR the QB went to on that side. Watch the all-22 footage from this year, or find one of the accounts on Twitter that compiles clips. The WRs are not separating consistently. Allen regularly has nowhere to go with the ball. It was especially evident against the Jets. It isn't because of his decision making, it's because the talent in the room stinks. Beane has admitted that by trading for Cooper. Why can't you do the same? I'd say there was a possibility for the WR room to work but it was too thin to sustain the injuries that it has. Samuel taking an arrow to a toe tragically makes me think we never even got to see what it was supposed to look like. But beyond that the whole everyone eats thing relies on everyone being at their best to stretch the defense. But a hobbled Samuel and then Shakir is out then coming back from injury so defenses can focus on a rookie WR who has had some moments but that's an awful big ask, and if it's not him it's the legion of average and the plan was never to ask them to do that much. Big reason why this trade is so nice is Cooper doesn't even have to be as great as he's been just good and we can stretch teams out some more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scuba guy Posted 13 minutes ago Share Posted 13 minutes ago 3 hours ago, SteveFreeman22 said: If you think Cleveland to Buffalo is a long drive, I'm thinking you haven't taken many long drives in your life. Since I drive to Florida 5 times a year Cleveland is just down the street Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted 3 minutes ago Share Posted 3 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Warcodered said: I'd say there was a possibility for the WR room to work but it was too thin to sustain the injuries that it has. Samuel taking an arrow to a toe tragically makes me think we never even got to see what it was supposed to look like. But beyond that the whole everyone eats thing relies on everyone being at their best to stretch the defense. But a hobbled Samuel and then Shakir is out then coming back from injury so defenses can focus on a rookie WR who has had some moments but that's an awful big ask, and if it's not him it's the legion of average and the plan was never to ask them to do that much. Big reason why this trade is so nice is Cooper doesn't even have to be as great as he's been just good and we can stretch teams out some more. With the addition of Cooper, I'd sit Samuel until he's ready. Cooper and Coleman/Hollins on the outside, Shakir in the slot and then sprinkle in TEs and RBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted just now Share Posted just now 11 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: He HATED Watson apparently. The Watson trade has to be the worst trade in NFL history. The Browns gave up 3 first round picks plus 3 additional picks in rounds 3-4 to get back Watson whose fully guaranteed contract has two more years on it. The Browns at best can get out of Watson's deal in 2026 by having him do a post June 1st release which would still leave his dead cap hit at 76 million while pushing 26.9 of dead cap into 2027. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.