Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 7 Posted October 7 (edited) There's always room for criticism. I'll go with pick Mark Kelly instead of Walz. Astronaut, devoted husband and father, smart as hell. What's not to like. Secondly, she needs more Q and A. Go on Fox. Meet the press etc. More aggressive anti trump ads. Edited October 7 by Joe Ferguson forever 2
B-Man Posted October 7 Posted October 7 22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: There's always room for criticism. I'll go with pick Mark Kelly instead of Walz. Astronaut, devoted husband and father, smart as hell. What's not to like. Secondly, she needs more Q and A. Go on Fox. Meet the press etc. More aggressive anti trump ads. I agree completely with these suggestions. The fact that she is unwilling, and incapable, of making these last minute changes says it all. She is not capable enough to be our President. . 3
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 7 Author Posted October 7 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: I agree completely with these suggestions. The fact that she is unwilling, and incapable, of making these last minute changes says it all. She is not capable enough to be our President. . Ok. She wasn't my first choice. Who would you have chosen were you a D (gasp).? Me? Tim Kaine.
B-Man Posted October 7 Posted October 7 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Ok. She wasn't my first choice. Who would you have chosen were you a D (gasp).? Me? Tim Kaine. That is a tough one. There are absolutely NO Democrats in Washington that I could support, I guess that I would have to try a 'moderate' governor. Colorado Governor Jared Polis, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly or Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro. 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 7 Author Posted October 7 (edited) Had the chance to meet Kaine a few times. most recently before my wife's naturalization ceremony, by chance, in restaurant. He and his wife are the real deal. no pretense. He wasn't pressing for our votes. He was just a very decent, nice guy. No wonder he did so poorly in the 2016 VP debates. He's not a pitbull. He's a lab. And he's moderate. This is the model we should be advancing.. Kamala's who we''ve got. She's left of Kaine. Certainly less accessible here in Va but has my vote against trump. Shocked right? Edited October 7 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Tommy Callahan Posted October 7 Posted October 7 7 hours ago, B-Man said: That is a tough one. There are absolutely NO Democrats in Washington that I could support, I guess that I would have to try a 'moderate' governor. Colorado Governor Jared Polis, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly or Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro. It's all trash on the federal level.
Tiberius Posted October 7 Posted October 7 She is doing fine. I like the way she is making sure to approach the main issues that voters are interested in and pushing them: women's rights, lower taxes on middle class, health care, how Trump killed immigration deal, supporting the actual constitution and unity abroad and at home and peeling away Republicans on the margins. In the end, elections are decided on the issues. Trump can lie, but Harris just needs to keep pushing the truth. It will all come down to the ground game, and Harris has already built that. If the country actually wants the hate, chaos and authoritarianism Trump is pushing, then not much she can do about it And I think Walz was a good pick. 1 2
BillsFanNC Posted October 7 Posted October 7 She could do better by not sitting for an interview with a racist. 1
BillsFanNC Posted October 7 Posted October 7 Will Quack, MD condemn Kamala Harris for agreeing to an interview with confirmed racist Howard Stern? 1
Tiberius Posted October 7 Posted October 7 I believe she will win. Elections come down to the issues and Trump has nothing. Tariffs? Whatever. Killing health care? Who wants that? Women's health care issues, that's all on Harris's side. Trump has no answer for inflation except more inflation with tariffs. Trump killed the border bill, that sure fixes things, ha ha. The big difference between from 2016 and today is that intelligent and decent people know that Trump's horde of ignoramuses can push him over the top if people don't vote. They will vote. 1 1 1
Steve O Posted October 7 Posted October 7 23 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Trump killed the border bill, that sure fixes things, ha ha. Trump had no vote. The contents is what killed the border bill. And while we're correcting facts, let's stop trying to soften what invasion is with semantics. When one illegally crosses a sovereign nation's borders, that person is invading it. That makes the person a foreign invader. Calling people asylum seekers doesn't change that. 4 1
BillsFanNC Posted October 7 Posted October 7 3 minutes ago, Steve O said: Trump had no vote. The contents is what killed the border bill. And while we're correcting facts, let's stop trying to soften what invasion is with semantics. When one illegally crosses a sovereign nation's borders, that person is invading it. That makes the person a foreign invader. Calling people asylum seekers doesn't change that. 2 2 1 2
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 7 Posted October 7 10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: There's always room for criticism. I'll go with pick Mark Kelly instead of Walz. Astronaut, devoted husband and father, smart as hell. What's not to like. Secondly, she needs more Q and A. Go on Fox. Meet the press etc. More aggressive anti trump ads. An open, unscripted press conference would be nice. Why do you think she hasn’t and likely won’t do any of this? As you believe yourself to be in the “honest/good faith tribe” please don’t obfuscate with your answer. 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 7 Posted October 7 11 minutes ago, Steve O said: Trump had no vote. The contents is what killed the border bill. And while we're correcting facts, let's stop trying to soften what invasion is with semantics. When one illegally crosses a sovereign nation's borders, that person is invading it. That makes the person a foreign invader. Calling people asylum seekers doesn't change that. The asylum designation is being exploited because people crossing the border are doing so for economic reasons. When advocates claim they've come here to work or we "need workers" that's completely irrelevant. There are visa programs, green cards, and other procedures in place to cover worker designations. The criteria for asylum designation protections does not solely recognize economic reasons as legitimate for approval under the asylum program. Everyone has a scheduled hearing. Most won't show up and by rule should be deported. And this administration won't do anything about it. They suck and whomever they work for it isn't the American citizen. 2 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 7 Author Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: I believe she will win. Elections come down to the issues and Trump has nothing. Tariffs? Whatever. Killing health care? Who wants that? Women's health care issues, that's all on Harris's side. Trump has no answer for inflation except more inflation with tariffs. Trump killed the border bill, that sure fixes things, ha ha. The big difference between from 2016 and today is that intelligent and decent people know that Trump's horde of ignoramuses can push him over the top if people don't vote. They will vote. I hope you're correct. She should be much further ahead of this obvious slime ball however. I'd certainly settle for a 1 electoral vote victory but we know that trump wouldn't accept it. Sadly, we need a bigger cushion to lower the chance of a repeat Jan 6 type event. 1
Tiberius Posted October 7 Posted October 7 2 hours ago, Steve O said: Trump had no vote. The contents is what killed the border bill. And while we're correcting facts, let's stop trying to soften what invasion is with semantics. When one illegally crosses a sovereign nation's borders, that person is invading it. That makes the person a foreign invader. Calling people asylum seekers doesn't change that. BS 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I hope you're correct. She should be much further ahead of this obvious slime ball however. I'd certainly settle for a 1 electoral vote victory but we know that trump wouldn't accept it. Sadly, we need a bigger cushion to lower the chance of a repeat Jan 6 type event. She will have the popular vote and enough to win, no matter how small it is. Another thing, Hillary had been around for so long and had been tarred by so many negatives over the years that a lot of people really didn't like her. Now Trump is the product that is past its use by date. Harris is relatively new, that helps 1 1
Westside Posted October 7 Posted October 7 47 minutes ago, Tiberius said: BS She will have the popular vote and enough to win, no matter how small it is. Another thing, Hillary had been around for so long and had been tarred by so many negatives over the years that a lot of people really didn't like her. Now Trump is the product that is past its use by date. Harris is relatively new, that helps Keep dreaming. 🤣 1 1
Steve O Posted October 7 Posted October 7 7 hours ago, Steve O said: Trump had no vote. The contents is what killed the border bill. And while we're correcting facts, let's stop trying to soften what invasion is with semantics. When one illegally crosses a sovereign nation's borders, that person is invading it. That makes the person a foreign invader. Calling people asylum seekers doesn't change that. 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: BS Well thought out response. 1 1 1
Recommended Posts