Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Chaos said:

he was out of bounds before he was hit, or the ball came lose.

He wasn't out when the guy grabbed him and his toe was just on the line when he lost the ball.  Half a step earlier and it's a fumble.  I'm not even sure why it was close Josh made it closer that it needed to be.

Posted
1 minute ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

That ain’t getting overturned…if it was ruled a catch it woulda stood 

Probably right but it should have been ruled a catch first by the officials. But of course its the NFL where guessing about the play is the norm.

Posted
Just now, Mikie2times said:

It moved slightly when he was bringing it in and at that point his feet would not have been in bounds. It would have been difficult to overrule if it was ruled a catch but it was not getting overturned as an incomplete pass

Zero chance of reversal when it was called incomplete 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Playoffs? said:

WTF do you have to lose by not challenging it?  A timeout that McD would misuse anyway?  
 

So sick of this team. 

Mc13 is a moron and always has been.

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Nope he put air under it and asked his WR to go locate the ball. Hollins lost it in the air.

There was no reason to put air under it.   Hollins had the guy beat by miles.  Why make a layup more difficult?

Edited by thenorthremembers
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...