Bruffalo Posted October 6 Posted October 6 The fact that wasn’t challenged is fireable. Youre down 11. The half is almost over, what are you saving those TOs for? 1 1 1 1
LifeLongBillsFan Posted October 6 Posted October 6 You have to challenge that - but on the other hand fn NFL Refs. Any consistency from game to game and play to play would be nice 1
BillsFan130 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Returntoglory said: No Challenge? Gutless! He needs to save that timeout for when Houston has a 3rd and long, ultimately to let up a first down 1
oldmanfan Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, BuffBills51 said: So we brought in a guy specifically for challenges and we don’t challenge that? Maybe he told them it wasn’t a catch 1
4merper4mer Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, zow2 said: I don’t think they would’ve overturned it but why not challenge? and why doesn’t Kincaid argue for it Because we traded the guy that gave a crap about winning and kept the guys who prefer having fun?
BuffBillsForLife Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Well you see, we need to save those timeouts for, uh... 1
RiotAct Posted October 6 Posted October 6 yeah you have to challenge that, don’t you? Did he forget that you get a fresh set of three to start the 2nd half or something?
RobbRiddick Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Houston are doing well stopping Josh's roll outs to the right. He beat it that time but they have a person in his face consistently. Can we get a RB to block and give him time to launch one? 1 1
BuffaloBillyG Posted October 6 Posted October 6 This team is gonna struggle to win 10 games this year 1
JoshAllin Posted October 6 Posted October 6 So whats the point of hiring someone to watch for replays up top if they wont call it
RichRiderBills Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Playoffs? said: WTF do you have to lose by not challenging it? A timeout that McD would misuse anyway? So sick of this team. Yep, should have challenged.
Yobogoya! Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Generic_Bills_Fan said: That ain’t getting overturned…if it was ruled a catch it woulda stood The risk/reward makes sense to try it there tho. Unless McD is saving all 3 timeouts for his patented defensive t/o’s to end the half… 1
Motorin' Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, Hsker4life said: Not a catch bc he double caught it. Feet were off the ground by then Yeah, it looked like he didn't get possession until his feet were off the ground.
SUNTANBILLS FAN Posted October 6 Posted October 6 We have little depth! No safeties! No WR! Glad diggs got out he will win with Houston
Draconator Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, paulmm3 said: Wtf not challenging that was a catch. Fire McDermott hire Belichick You want to loose every game? 1
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted October 6 Posted October 6 We have a challenge guy. If he said not to challenge, then you listen to him. 1
Recommended Posts