HurlyBurly51 Posted October 12 Posted October 12 4 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said: I don’t know. Pegula may not have brought us a Super Bowl yet, but is it really worth parting with a 2nd to bring Davis over? 🙃 No. A 4th and they eat salary. There's other options, so the leverage lies with the Bills. Quote
strive_for_five_guy Posted October 12 Posted October 12 3 minutes ago, HurlyBurly51 said: No. A 4th and they eat salary. There's other options, so the leverage lies with the Bills. How does Davis fit in as an owner, if we have Pegula already? Quote
Sojourner Posted October 12 Posted October 12 1 minute ago, strive_for_five_guy said: How does Davis fit in as an owner, if we have Pegula already? There isn’t a single Raider fan I know who has anything good to say about the guy. None of them think he has an interest in having a competent team. With them being the bigger sporting attraction in Vegas, he’ll keep making money. That, from what it seems, is all Mark cares about. Quote
HurlyBurly51 Posted October 12 Posted October 12 16 minutes ago, strive_for_five_guy said: How does Davis fit in as an owner, if we have Pegula already? 2 1 Quote
Fan in Chicago Posted October 12 Posted October 12 (edited) 47 minutes ago, HurlyBurly51 said: No. A 4th and they eat salary. There's other options, so the leverage lies with the Bills. With the presumption that adding him will dramatically improve the Bills situation for the rest of the season, some overpay is justified. Offer the Raiders our 3rd and ask them to eat some of the cap. Adams comes to a good team, this thread closes down, everyone is happy Edited October 12 by Fan in Chicago Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted October 12 Posted October 12 (edited) 6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: No disrespect, but this “story” or source seems to just adjust based on the rumors of the day. This particular source of rumors lost me at us offering a 2nd and 2 picks before getting to this point 🤣. There’s no way we offered that. If we did and Adams wasn’t blocking the trade somehow anymore like is alleged here the raiders would’ve taken that in an instant I don’t think you even hold out for better Edited October 13 by Generic_Bills_Fan 1 Quote
HurlyBurly51 Posted October 12 Posted October 12 15 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said: With the presumption that adding him will dramatically improve the Bills situation for the rest of the season, some overpay is justified. Offer the Raiders our 3rd and ask them to eat some of the cap. Adams comes to a good team, this thread closes down, everyone is happy My issue with the price is that he is (presumably) a rental. Quote
NewEra Posted October 12 Posted October 12 2 hours ago, WotAGuy said: Are they in a cap position to make a significant move? What could they do to free up enough space to sign someone like Adams? Just because the rumor mill is churning and media outlets are stoking it to generate views and revenue, doesn’t mean the Bills are seriously considering a move. Their track record is to sign broken down guys off the couch to address mid-season needs. We traded for rasul Douglas just last season. agree to disagree 2 1 Quote
WotAGuy Posted October 12 Posted October 12 16 minutes ago, NewEra said: We traded for rasul Douglas just last season. agree to disagree Ah, forgot about that. A really good move at that. Well, here’s hoping they do something to address an obvious need for a playmaker. 1 Quote
DaVinci Posted October 13 Posted October 13 2 hours ago, strive_for_five_guy said: I don’t know. Pegula may not have brought us a Super Bowl yet, but is it really worth parting with a 2nd to bring Davis over? I dont necessarily disagree with you but when is Beans "plan" going to start working? Is this a ten year plan? 1 Quote
Governor Posted October 13 Posted October 13 (edited) We aren’t good enough to bother with any of this. Just play the season with what we have and hope for a somewhat better pick. Our absolute ceiling is winning 1 playoff game against a team that can’t score. Edited October 13 by Governor 2 1 Quote
Governor Posted October 13 Posted October 13 11 minutes ago, DaVinci said: I dont necessarily disagree with you but when is Beans "plan" going to start working? Is this a ten year plan? This is already the end of plan B. One more to go. 1 Quote
DCofNC Posted October 13 Posted October 13 1 hour ago, WotAGuy said: Ah, forgot about that. A really good move at that. Well, here’s hoping they do something to address an obvious need for a playmaker. One that caused him to panic about his missing third round pick so he wouldn’t go up and get an affordable WR bc Sean need another rotational DT. 1 Quote
DJB Posted October 13 Posted October 13 (edited) Ah yes the BS stage whereby the team won’t trade him in an attempt to increase the offers…. Edited October 13 by DJB Quote
GolfandBills Posted October 13 Posted October 13 5 minutes ago, DJB said: Ah yes the BS stage whereby the team won’t trade him in an attempt to increase the offers…. San Fran didn’t trade Aiyuk when everyone thought they would. You never know 1 Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted October 13 Posted October 13 2 minutes ago, GolfandBills said: San Fran didn’t trade Aiyuk when everyone thought they would. You never know I think you’re both right, they’re definitely trying to drive up the price and would trade him in theory but he’s gonna end up not going anywhere because the raiders are expecting too much 2 Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted October 13 Posted October 13 Screw it go get Hopkins or Cooper then. Or 🤷♂️both 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted October 13 Posted October 13 5 minutes ago, GolfandBills said: San Fran didn’t trade Aiyuk when everyone thought they would. You never know But the Niners are contending, and the Raiders are not. That's a big difference. 1 Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted October 13 Posted October 13 2 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: Screw it go get Hopkins or Cooper then. Or 🤷♂️both I doubt cooper is getting traded…the browns are completely stuck financially just hoping Watson finds it again. I feel like Hopkins wanted to be here in free agency and we changed our minds on him not sure if that makes him more or less likely to end up here via trade though lol probably a cheaper price than Adams though which is nice Quote
DJB Posted October 13 Posted October 13 19 minutes ago, GolfandBills said: San Fran didn’t trade Aiyuk when everyone thought they would. You never know Aiyuk wanted to stay though along with the bag. Adams has the bag and wants out . Big difference to me Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.