Bills!Win! Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 I’m getting tired of looking at this topic 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 1 hour ago, WotAGuy said: By the same token, if the Bills beat the Jets, there will be less pressure to make a move. It seems clear the Bills want to make it through this season without further addressing the WR room. They had all offseason and had to know this is what they had all along. What team is built to be in blowouts? KC is able to deal with it the best, but only because of Mahomes. Then why were they still involved in trade talks other teams were listed as “out”? I don’t agree with the bolded. Beans is always looking to upgrade at the right price 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sojourner Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 1 hour ago, WotAGuy said: By the same token, if the Bills beat the Jets, there will be less pressure to make a move. It seems clear the Bills want to make it through this season without further addressing the WR room. They had all offseason and had to know this is what they had all along. What team is built to be in blowouts? KC is able to deal with it the best, but only because of Mahomes. That wasn’t my point so you tell me… But since you asked, an opposite to the Baltimore team would be our Bills over the last few years. Team was literally built for having a lead where the opponent was more often than not forced to be in a passing situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaB Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 1 hour ago, WotAGuy said: By the same token, if the Bills beat the Jets, there will be less pressure to make a move. It seems clear the Bills want to make it through this season without further addressing the WR room. They had all offseason and had to know this is what they had all along. What team is built to be in blowouts? KC is able to deal with it the best, but only because of Mahomes. Really, they had to know this is what they had? Last year they had Sherfield and Harty starting over Shakir, did they know then? How about when they handed Davis and McKenzie starting jobs only to go sign Brown and Beasley in late in the season because hoping to get mor stability, they know then? How about doubling down on Davis, blaming his bad hands on a bum ankle. This staff seems ***** clueless at times, this is just another example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 I just heard the hold up is getting Davante a Taco Bell for his house. Apparently a Mighty Taco won't do 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 6 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: I just heard the hold up is getting Davante a Taco Bell for his house. Apparently a Mighty Taco won't do He’s never had mighty before so clearly he hasn’t been in buffalo on a recruiting tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaVinci Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 I’ve been told multiple times this year that the Raiders are asking for a second and that some of the offers that are coming in, I cannot say this loud enough, have been in the range of a fourth,” Yahoo and FOX Sports host Jason Fitz said this week on Raider Nation Radio’s The Morning Tailgate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 17 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Here is what I was just told Again, this person is not a Bills fan, has good connections and has never lied to me So FWIW “It’s back on but now it’s a game of chess. Allen talked to Adams, Adams has changed his mind and wants to go. The issue now is Vegas getting greedy and trying to get a better package” No disrespect, but this “story” or source seems to just adjust based on the rumors of the day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfandBills Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 29 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: No disrespect, but this “story” or source seems to just adjust based on the rumors of the day. Exactly. Take it for what it’s worth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jahnyc Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 Notwithstanding our potential interest in Adams, given our cap situation and ownership of the Raiders not looking to retain salary, I just can't see the Bills as a serious contender for Adams. Having said that, another reason that it would be great to soundly beat the Jets is that it can only help push this possibility forward if Adams cares more about playing for a winning team instead of someone he has played with before (i.e., Carr or Rogers). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 4 hours ago, NewEra said: Then why were they still involved in trade talks other teams were listed as “out”? I don’t agree with the bolded. Beans is always looking to upgrade at the right price Are they in a cap position to make a significant move? What could they do to free up enough space to sign someone like Adams? Just because the rumor mill is churning and media outlets are stoking it to generate views and revenue, doesn’t mean the Bills are seriously considering a move. Their track record is to sign broken down guys off the couch to address mid-season needs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 3 hours ago, BananaB said: Really, they had to know this is what they had? Last year they had Sherfield and Harty starting over Shakir, did they know then? How about when they handed Davis and McKenzie starting jobs only to go sign Brown and Beasley in late in the season because hoping to get mor stability, they know then? How about doubling down on Davis, blaming his bad hands on a bum ankle. This staff seems ***** clueless at times, this is just another example. You can know you have garbage and still try to make it work. It seems pretty clear that’s what’s been happening ever since Josh got here, other than the Diggs trade. For whatever reason, WR seems to be a position group that the Bills don’t put much value on. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 4 hours ago, Bills!Win! said: I’m getting tired of looking at this topic and I don't want his injured azs at his age. Jets more likely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaVinci Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 If Im bean and I really want Davis I would gladly part with a 2cnd if the Raiders retain a consideral amount of salary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sojourner Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 Just now, DaVinci said: If Im bean and I really want Davis I would gladly part with a 2cnd if the Raiders retain a consideral amount of salary. That’s likely the hold up and why the reports are that teams are only offering day 3 picks… Raiders want to get a rounds 1-3 draft pick and the trading team eat the salary. There’s a few teams who could easily eat the salary but are choosing not to do so on top of a draft pick. That, for now, bodes well for Buffalo if they truly are exploring the acquisition of Adams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaB Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 35 minutes ago, WotAGuy said: You can know you have garbage and still try to make it work. It seems pretty clear that’s what’s been happening ever since Josh got here, other than the Diggs trade. For whatever reason, WR seems to be a position group that the Bills don’t put much value on. I think Beane cheaps out hoping Allen can make up for it. He believes those players will hit their peak instead of their average. They had Shakir for two TCs and a full season and still started Harty and Sherfield over him. They are clueless with some personal decisions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaVinci Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 10 minutes ago, BananaB said: I think Beane cheaps out hoping Allen can make up for it. He believes those players will hit their peak instead of their average. They had Shakir for two TCs and a full season and still started Harty and Sherfield over him. They are clueless with some personal decisions I don’t think they are clueless, but there has to be some rationale for those types of decisions. Maybe practice performance suggests mistakes will be made in games, or attitude adjustments need to be made, or contractual promises were made…..could be a lot of reasons other than stupidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted October 12 Share Posted October 12 50 minutes ago, DaVinci said: If Im bean and I really want Davis I would gladly part with a 2cnd if the Raiders retain a consideral amount of salary. I don’t know. Pegula may not have brought us a Super Bowl yet, but is it really worth parting with a 2nd to bring Davis over? 🙃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.