ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 1 minute ago, K D said: They don't need to all be voting yet. Their plan is to make them citizens so they can officially vote. Use your brain This is stupid. The only way anyone can actually believe this is if they have so encapsulated themselves in a bubble that they are incapable of actually talking to and listening to anyone who works for or has worked for the Dems. Because this isn’t the plan, it’s never been the plan, it won’t be the plan. It’s just stupid right wing internet nonsense like Haitians eating pets. But the clickservatives eat it up because the internet has given them the smoothest brains.
K D Posted September 29 Posted September 29 26 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: This is stupid. The only way anyone can actually believe this is if they have so encapsulated themselves in a bubble that they are incapable of actually talking to and listening to anyone who works for or has worked for the Dems. Because this isn’t the plan, it’s never been the plan, it won’t be the plan. It’s just stupid right wing internet nonsense like Haitians eating pets. But the clickservatives eat it up because the internet has given them the smoothest brains. So they will send them back to where they came from? Or will they make them citizens who can then vote legally? They are not deporting voters
ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 18 minutes ago, K D said: So they will send them back to where they came from? Or will they make them citizens who can then vote legally? They are not deporting voters Apparently modern conservatism relies on people being unwilling or incapable of grappling with difficult issues. Let’s say we fix the border tomorrow. Suddenly, there are 0 undocumented immigrants coming into the country. Great! But what do you do about the people who are already here? What about someone who was brought here illegally as a child but is now a productive adult? What’s your solution?
Thurmal34 Posted September 29 Posted September 29 This FEELS LIKE A THREAD THAT WONT DEGENERATE TO HATE. funny< not one thread on banning mass shooters. Melanin matters...
K D Posted September 29 Posted September 29 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said: Apparently modern conservatism relies on people being unwilling or incapable of grappling with difficult issues. Let’s say we fix the border tomorrow. Suddenly, there are 0 undocumented immigrants coming into the country. Great! But what do you do about the people who are already here? What about someone who was brought here illegally as a child but is now a productive adult? What’s your solution? Deport illegal people who shouldn't be here. Pretty simple. It's a big world there are plenty of nice countries out there. There are 10 million in the past few years. We will start there and see how far we can get.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 29 Posted September 29 4 hours ago, Thurmal34 said: This FEELS LIKE A THREAD THAT WONT DEGENERATE TO HATE. funny< not one thread on banning mass shooters. Melanin matters... Look at you trying to have a thought! Good effort! 2
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 29 Posted September 29 (edited) 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Using a term tech people are familiar with, the claim this bill was needed summarizes the adminitrations view that the current immigration system is "working as designed". And new legislation is needed to fix it. Another familiar term that describes the proposed fix is "going right to solutioning without understanding the root cause of the problem". This is not a situation where random people show up at the US border and request asylum status to enter the country. A complex web of private and public organizations support this effort. Who are they? What are the names of the people running them? Where do they get their funding? How do they spend the money? It's an operation with a complex organizational structure. Let's find out how this business works to bring people in and the identities and motivations of the people running it before we start proposing solutions that don't address the factors supporting the flow and movement of people. That rejected border bill would do nothing to impact the trafficking system or stop the flow of people. I expect what we're up against is the world's biggest and best funded human trafficking operation. And nobody other than a few alt media investigative types are looking. My guess is the US taxpayer is directly and indirectly funding this operation and the administration's fingerprints are all over this mess. Edited September 29 by All_Pro_Bills 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 29 Author Posted September 29 Useful idiocy and TDS are sad diseases that unfortunately go hand in hand. Just witness it on display in here with all of the deflection and hand waving around border czar Kamala importing 13k illegal alien MURDERERS into our country. Sad. But we have no time to feel sorry for useful idiots. Fuk.c every single last one of them.
ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 5 hours ago, K D said: Deport illegal people who shouldn't be here. Pretty simple. It's a big world there are plenty of nice countries out there. There are 10 million in the past few years. We will start there and see how far we can get. How are you going to deport 10 million people? How does that work logistically?
K D Posted September 29 Posted September 29 22 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: How are you going to deport 10 million people? How does that work logistically?
BillsFanNC Posted September 29 Author Posted September 29 I have extended family who works in border patrol. It is indeed logistically impossible to deport them all. Of course that was the whole point of the dems importing them in the first place. The difference between useful idiots and sane people is sane people want to deport as many as possible, useful idiots like The King say its logistically impossible to deport them all and instead its just oh well what can you do?
ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 1 hour ago, K D said: Yeah, that’s about the level of detail I’d expect. Unserious, just like the GOP.
aristocrat Posted September 29 Posted September 29 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Yeah, that’s about the level of detail I’d expect. Unserious, just like the GOP. Since you’re smart how would you tackle deportations? 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted September 29 Posted September 29 3 hours ago, ChiGoose said: How are you going to deport 10 million people? How does that work logistically? Based on the evaluation of their asylum case. Either they: Show up and win their case Show up and lose Don't show up 2 or 3 issue deportation judgment. If the don't show up for deportation take the appropriate action. If none of this works tell DOJ/FBI they participated in J6. They'll definitely find every single person.
Tiberius Posted September 29 Posted September 29 19 hours ago, aristocrat said: So let’s not import murderers. We have enough crime. Can you agree the illegals previously convicted of murder should be deported? That’s fine, but immigrants are not a problem, they help make 🇺🇸 stronger.
K D Posted September 29 Posted September 29 12 hours ago, ChiGoose said: This is stupid. The only way anyone can actually believe this is if they have so encapsulated themselves in a bubble that they are incapable of actually talking to and listening to anyone who works for or has worked for the Dems. Because this isn’t the plan, it’s never been the plan, it won’t be the plan. It’s just stupid right wing internet nonsense like Haitians eating pets. But the clickservatives eat it up because the internet has given them the smoothest brains. 4 hours ago, ChiGoose said: How are you going to deport 10 million people? How does that work logistically? You owned yourself. It's not the plan but also you can't deport 10 million people so tough luck now there's illegal migrant voters. You aren't the sharpest bulb in the tool shed
ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 3 hours ago, K D said: You owned yourself. It's not the plan but also you can't deport 10 million people so tough luck now there's illegal migrant voters. You aren't the sharpest bulb in the tool shed If you believe the Dems are bringing in illegal immigrants to vote, then you need to log off the internet. You cannot use it responsibly and it’s rotted your brain. Utter nonsense.
ChiGoose Posted September 29 Posted September 29 6 hours ago, aristocrat said: Since you’re smart how would you tackle deportations? You first have to have a comprehensive approach that tackles the root causes of illegal immigration, fixes the broken asylum system, and incentivizes people to either come here legally or not come at all. Only then can you really figure out how to handle the people who are already here. Better staff immigration courts, simplify the legal immigration and asylum processes, give CBP the tools and staffing they actually need instead of a big stupid wall that wouldn’t even work. Today, it can take *years* to have an asylum claim adjudicated. If you’re really escaping violence or threats to your family, we’re basically telling you that you need to come here illegally because it’ll take too long to do it the right way. As long as we incentive that behavior, we’ll never fix the problem no matter how much money we waste on a wall in the middle of a desert.
B-Man Posted September 29 Posted September 29 7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: If you believe the Dems are bringing in illegal immigrants to vote, then you need to log off the internet. You cannot use it responsibly and it’s rotted your brain.
Recommended Posts