Success Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I truly appreciate this moment: we have one of the best teams in the league, and possibly the best; we have one of the best QB's in the league, and possibly the best; and we have the best game of the weekend, on SNF. We went to the fan version of hell and back since the Kelly years - but the payoff is good. 4 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenosha2Buffalo Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I've been strangely calm since Brady took over last season, I expect the same this week. McDermott has had Lamar's number for a while now. Good test , let's go. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 5 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: Weather reports are looking better. These all can change but looking more promising early. https://www.accuweather.com/en/us/baltimore/21202/evening-weather-forecast/348707?day=3 <--- Accuweather says a couple of showers in the evening - .1 inch expected right now. https://weather.com/weather/tenday/l/Baltimore+MD?canonicalCityId=97ee60ad2fa1394922f97788b2d2dfe435f20295a5d38940a32e042a73f2d8c6 <-- Weather Channel is saying a few light rain showers. https://foxbaltimore.com/weather/maps <--- Local Fox Affiliate only gives it a 30% chance of rain right now. Would be nice if weather is zero to a minimal factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, HappyDays said: Ed Oliver has been invisible to my eye, and interior pressure on the QB has been a noticeable weakness. Well, I don't have my pitchfork out. Just want to see more from him, that's all. He's getting paid a lot of money. Would you say you've noticed him making an impact outside of one big play against the Dolphins? To each their own. We’re 5th in the league in sacks. Sacks aren’t just generated by one person making the sack. Sacks are often a result of the entire defensive line keeping in their lanes and containing the QB in the pocket so one guy can reap the stat. Ed has not been a “noticeable weakness”. That proclamation is noticeably weak 3 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 25 minutes ago, NewEra said: To each their own. We’re 5th in the league in sacks. Sacks aren’t just generated by one person making the sack. Sacks are often a result of the entire defensive line keeping in their lanes and containing the QB in the pocket so one guy can reap the stat. Ed has not been a “noticeable weakness”. That proclamation is noticeably weak Couldn't have said it any better.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChronicAndKnuckles Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 (edited) On 9/25/2024 at 10:34 AM, YattaOkasan said: RAS says both our backups are bigger than the starters. So as far as size only we should be ok. However, I do worry about their processing. Thankfully the thing they do best (though Dorian has continue to take a step in coverage) is come down hill against the run. Derrick Henry I feel fine against. We have answered that question before and it feels like penetration from the DL is critical (as you mention) to slow him down so the rest of the team can get him down. As for the slowest set of safeties they managed to limit the leagues fastest set of skill players in miami just fine. I will acknowledge this is a slightly different problem because baltimore will happily stay with the run but it wont be "speed" that gets us. I worry more about processing from the second level when its play action. That said we sorta played a very similar offense (but with better outside weapons) week 1. Conners and that run game is very efficient and Kyler is probably the closest to Lamar's skill set. I think they are too good to be stopped but I think we have played a very similar offense. If you scrap nickel, it has to be morrow right? Still need to cover either or andrews or likely in the middle. I think we stay with Lewis. Mark Andrews is shot. Likely is the one I am far more concerned about. He actually reminds me a ton of Kincaid Edited September 27 by ChronicAndKnuckles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 34 minutes ago, NewEra said: Ed has not been a “noticeable weakness”. That proclamation is noticeably weak Weaker than Ed’s play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 3 minutes ago, WotAGuy said: Weaker than Ed’s play? Noticeably weaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 Josh is going to have to hit the deep shot in this game when it presents itself. This will keep Hamilton honest 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 1 hour ago, WotAGuy said: That’s why I always put $100 on black AND $100 on red. Guaranteed win. 4-D chess….. Unfortunately there are still 2 green spots, so no it's not a guaranteed win ha. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 27 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: Unfortunately there are still 2 green spots, so no it's not a guaranteed win ha. Wait, there’s green spots?? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 5 minutes ago, WotAGuy said: Wait, there’s green spots?? I just put it all on the green spots and wait... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 2 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said: I just put it all on the green spots and wait... I knew being color-blind would bite me in the ass someday. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 23 minutes ago, WotAGuy said: I knew being color-blind would bite me in the ass someday. Yeah 0 and 00 are both green if you actually didn't know that. This is how the house keeps an advantage on that game. Instead of being 50% odds, its 47.4%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sierra Foothills Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 11 hours ago, Mango said: The NFL keeps using the word enticing, but I don’t think they know what it means. 7 hours ago, Rockinon said: Taking on 600lbs of OL blockers compared to Ed only taking on 300lbs percentage wise and still applying more pressure is absolutely killing it. Having that much beef to contend with regularly is no small feat. Speaking of beef and feet, Mike Williams had small feet... at least compared to Bryant McKinnie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichRiderBills Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 3 hours ago, NewEra said: To each their own. We’re 5th in the league in sacks. Sacks aren’t just generated by one person making the sack. Sacks are often a result of the entire defensive line keeping in their lanes and containing the QB in the pocket so one guy can reap the stat. Ed has not been a “noticeable weakness”. That proclamation is noticeably weak Didn't announcers visibly say Ed was a force in Miami game? I thought Ed was hard to see in half #1 of the cards game, but otherwise has been active since. Tough to make statistical judgements in two other games that were both over by halftime. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 4 hours ago, NewEra said: Ed has not been a “noticeable weakness”. That proclamation is noticeably weak I mean it isn't just what my eyes are telling me. That chart I posted says he is winning on pass rushes at a below league average rate despite getting bottom of the league double team rates. If you want to claim the chart is wrong, or that we have the only defensive scheme that asks our 3T to play patty cake in his gap more than we ask him to try and rush the passer, go for it. And for what it's worth I'm not an Ed Oliver hater. My own eyes tell me he has been quite good as a run stopper this season (I don't have a chart for that one). I also thought he was quite good overall last year in both areas and exceeded my expectations. As a pass rusher this season though I have been underwhelmed especially relative to the size of his paycheck. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Helmet of Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 (edited) I apologize if this has already been shared. This is a praise sandwich of Oliver’s performance against Miami. Considering Baltimore’s starting interior O line is banged up ( left guard doubtful and center questionable with a knee ), I believe Oliver is a major X factor in this contest. He needs to wreak havoc. Edited September 28 by The Helmet of 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 6 hours ago, HappyDays said: I mean it isn't just what my eyes are telling me. That chart I posted says he is winning on pass rushes at a below league average rate despite getting bottom of the league double team rates. If you want to claim the chart is wrong, or that we have the only defensive scheme that asks our 3T to play patty cake in his gap more than we ask him to try and rush the passer, go for it. And for what it's worth I'm not an Ed Oliver hater. My own eyes tell me he has been quite good as a run stopper this season (I don't have a chart for that one). I also thought he was quite good overall last year in both areas and exceeded my expectations. As a pass rusher this season though I have been underwhelmed especially relative to the size of his paycheck. I’m not claiming anything about the chart being correct or not. I’m claiming that he’s not a noticeable weakness, because he’s not. I agree, ed has been “underwhelming as a pass rusher”. That’s not what you said prior. A noticeable weakness is something that can be taken advantage of and is hurting our team. Ed’s run D and discipline in his rush lanes have been part of our defenses success. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.