Fan in Chicago Posted December 18 Posted December 18 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: He ain't getting his wish to be cut now so he can sign with KC. 2 1 Quote
Charles Romes Posted December 18 Posted December 18 (edited) If they trade him won’t they have a dead cap it in the amount of his salary. Edited December 18 by Charles Romes Quote
Antonio Posted December 18 Posted December 18 12 minutes ago, Charles Romes said: If they trade him won’t they have a dead cap it in the mount of his salary. They can´t trade him now, they have to wait till next season. He may be asking to be cut so he can sign with a contender... KC for sure, but I don´t think the phins will do that, right?! RIGHT?! Quote
skibum Posted December 18 Posted December 18 Somebody please tell me it is not possible for Tyreek Hill to get cut and sign with the Chiefs right now. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted December 18 Posted December 18 On 9/13/2024 at 2:17 PM, T.E. said: If he went to, like, the Rams, that team would go to the Super Bowl. in what year? 1 Quote
skibum Posted December 18 Posted December 18 By "go coach", he could have meant, "take up a career in coaching". 1 Quote
JP51 Posted December 18 Posted December 18 (edited) 6 minutes ago, skibum said: Somebody please tell me it is not possible for Tyreek Hill to get cut and sign with the Chiefs right now. Anything is possible... but literally 30 other teams would have to pass him up on a waiver claim... before he went to FA... so actually, the Bills would have a chance to grab him before the Chiefs... If my logic is correct... but the difference on the CAP hit would be significant if we claimed him off waivers rather than signing him as a FA I believe. Edited December 18 by JP51 1 Quote
Antonio Posted December 18 Posted December 18 2 minutes ago, JP51 said: Anything is possible... but literally 30 other teams would have to pass him up on a waiver claim... before he went to FA... so actually, the Bills would have a chance to grab him before the Chiefs... If my logic is correct... Oh forgot about waivers. Are all players subject to waivers? The team that claims the player takes on his current contact right?! 1 minute ago, Antonio said: Oh forgot about waivers. Are all players subject to waivers? The team that claims the player takes on his current contact right?! justo checked and... No, not all NFL players are subject to waivers: Players with fewer than four accrued seasons These players are subject to waivers, which means other teams can claim their contracts. If a player goes unclaimed, they become a free agent. Players with four or more accrued seasons These players are considered vested veterans and are released, which means their contracts are terminated and they can immediately sign with any team. 1 2 1 Quote
JP51 Posted December 18 Posted December 18 2 minutes ago, Antonio said: Oh forgot about waivers. Are all players subject to waivers? The team that claims the player takes on his current contact right?! justo checked and... No, not all NFL players are subject to waivers: Players with fewer than four accrued seasons These players are subject to waivers, which means other teams can claim their contracts. If a player goes unclaimed, they become a free agent. Players with four or more accrued seasons These players are considered vested veterans and are released, which means their contracts are terminated and they can immediately sign with any team. Thank you for that... I suspected I might have gotten it wrong. Quote
Blank Stare Posted December 18 Posted December 18 Aren’t all players subject waivers this time of year? In part to prevent the kind of scenario being suggested (i.e., forcing your way off a good team to a contending team)? 1 Quote
thenorthremembers Posted December 18 Posted December 18 11 minutes ago, skibum said: Somebody please tell me it is not possible for Tyreek Hill to get cut and sign with the Chiefs right now. Miami isnt going to release him. The dead money for the remainder of this year alone 10.5 million. Not to mention the additional 40 million in dead cap for next year. If they move on from him its going to be with picks in hand. 2 Quote
Warcodered Posted December 18 Posted December 18 6 minutes ago, Antonio said: Oh forgot about waivers. Are all players subject to waivers? The team that claims the player takes on his current contact right?! justo checked and... No, not all NFL players are subject to waivers: Players with fewer than four accrued seasons These players are subject to waivers, which means other teams can claim their contracts. If a player goes unclaimed, they become a free agent. Players with four or more accrued seasons These players are considered vested veterans and are released, which means their contracts are terminated and they can immediately sign with any team. Until after the trade deadline. 3 Quote
CA OC Bills Fan Posted December 18 Posted December 18 19 minutes ago, Blank Stare said: Aren’t all players subject waivers this time of year? In part to prevent the kind of scenario being suggested (i.e., forcing your way off a good team to a contending team)? Yes, Warcodered said it but in case he wasn't clear enough, after the trade deadline all players are subject to waivers. And yes, the team claiming takes on the current contract which would make it difficult for the Bills to claim him. There must be some playoff team that could take it on though. After waivers, he's a free agent and any team can negotiate a salary with him. 1 Quote
Mat68 Posted December 18 Posted December 18 They should yes. I doubt they will or offensively can. That scheme is dependent in Hill keeping coverage back. Without Hill those 2nd level windows close. The run game is less effective with teams able to play more single high. McDaniel hasn't really created an identify for team. Players leave calling them soft. It is a bad look. Just paid Tua so imo they are tied to McDaniel. Miami will be Miami. Flash no substance. 1 Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted December 18 Posted December 18 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Until after the trade deadline. Yup. To prevent that actual scenario. Last time I can remember this happening is when the Broncos were moving on from Orton and the Bears needed a QB but the Chiefs claimed him off waivers But its a moot point. The dolphins are not cutting Hill this season Edited December 18 by Captain Hindsight Quote
JohnNord Posted December 18 Posted December 18 40 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: Miami isnt going to release him. The dead money for the remainder of this year alone 10.5 million. Not to mention the additional 40 million in dead cap for next year. If they move on from him its going to be with picks in hand. It would be idiotic for Miami to release him at this point in the year given the dead cap situation. Plus it sets a horrible precedent. As far as a trade after the season, there is an out in his contract after 2025 but how much are teams going to spend both in salary and capital on a 31 year-old WR’s whose game is built on speed? I think Miami’s stuck with him another season. 1 Quote
Doc Posted December 18 Posted December 18 (edited) 1 hour ago, skibum said: Somebody please tell me it is not possible for Tyreek Hill to get cut and sign with the Chiefs right now. Highly unlikely as they'd take a massive cap hit. And why cut him when they could possibly trade him after the season is over? The money is already mostly accounted for. Edited December 18 by Doc Quote
T.E. Posted December 18 Posted December 18 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: in what year? They could go this year without him. If they can beat us, they have a puncher's chance against anyone. 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted Wednesday at 09:01 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:01 PM 3 hours ago, skibum said: Somebody please tell me it is not possible for Tyreek Hill to get cut and sign with the Chiefs right now. Why would they sign him? I was told on here that the Bills handed them the next Tyreek Hill. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.