AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, Scraps said: I stand corrected. You are not a man of your values or convictions. Oh no. I'm sorry you can't fathom disagreeing about something and still letting it exist.
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Oh no. I'm sorry you can't fathom disagreeing about something and still letting it exist. So you believe Roe v Wade should have stood, or been codified. Edited September 13 by Scraps
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 @ScrapsWhat are your thoughts on women having multiple abortions?
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: @ScrapsWhat are your thoughts on women having multiple abortions? I don't see it as being my business.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 minute ago, Scraps said: I don't see it as being my business. Pretty sure it would be if it was your daughter or someone you cared about.
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Pretty sure it would be if it was your daughter or someone you cared about. So what's your point? I'm not telling any woman what she can or can not do. No law I support will result in women being unable to get the care they need in and ER.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, Scraps said: So what's your point? I'm not telling any woman what she can or can not do. No law I support will result in women being unable to get the care they need in and ER. Multiple abortions doesn't equal care...........
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Multiple abortions doesn't equal care........... Doesn't it? What if the woman has a hard time with pregnancy and is told her life would be in danger if she carried to term? If it is her second such pregnancy does the doctor say "Sorry, only one per customer"? Are multiple medication abortions in the first trimester as hard on the woman's body as an equal number of pregnancies carried to term? I think the issue is far more complicated than many pro lifers believe.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, Scraps said: Doesn't it? What if the woman has a hard time with pregnancy and is told her life would be in danger if she carried to term? If it is her second such pregnancy does the doctor say "Sorry, only one per customer"? Are multiple medication abortions in the first trimester as hard on the woman's body as an equal number of pregnancies carried to term? I think the issue is far more complicated than many pro lifers believe. What percentage of pregnancies are u talking about? Is it more than 40%? Not even close. Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: What percentage of pregnancies are u talking about? Is it more than 40%? Not even close. My point is that abortions are being used more as birth control than saving the life of the mother, by a large margin. That's where I have an issue.
ChiGoose Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: What percentage of pregnancies are u talking about? Is it more than 40%? Not even close. One to five percent
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: One to five percent Thanks for proving my point.
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 11 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: What percentage of pregnancies are u talking about? Is it more than 40%? Not even close. My point is that abortions are being used more as birth control than saving the life of the mother, by a large margin. That's where I have an issue. How do you separate the two?
ChiGoose Posted September 13 Posted September 13 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Thanks for proving my point. That's just for recurrent pregnancies losses. 10-25% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage (which often requires abortion to treat).
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 minute ago, Scraps said: How do you separate the two? U don't, they are two different issues completely. If a women's life is at risk, then I understand the need for an abortion. This doesn't apply for 95 percent of abortions, unfortunately. Just now, ChiGoose said: That's just for recurrent pregnancies losses. 10-25% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage (which often requires abortion to treat). Still alot less than the percentage of women who have multiple abortions.
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: U don't, they are two different issues completely. If a women's life is at risk, then I understand the need for an abortion. This doesn't apply for 95 percent of abortions, unfortunately. ChiGoose posted some revised statistics. So your solution is to ban abortions?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 3 minutes ago, Scraps said: ChiGoose posted some revised statistics. So your solution is to ban abortions? JFC..........
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: JFC.......... Meh. You won't take a stand based on your values. Why not?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 15 minutes ago, Scraps said: Meh. You won't take a stand based on your values. Why not? I've already stated my position, sorry it doesn't fit into your one size fits all MAGA box.
Scraps Posted September 13 Posted September 13 12 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I've already stated my position, sorry it doesn't fit into your one size fits all MAGA box. So what is your position? If you think there are to many abortions, how would you limit them? "Leave it to the states" is a cop out.
Recommended Posts