Jump to content

ILLEGAL ALIEN Menu: Dogs, Cats And Geese


Recommended Posts

 ⬆️ 

 

:lol:

 

Riiiight porn boy.

 

 If you wanted to be clear with "source" in this context then you would have said:

 

ONE of the sources interviewed by the reporter in Springfield (among the 8 or so interviewed in total) referred to Haitians as sand monkeys.

 

But you didnt do that. Because you're intellectually dishonest and wanted to brand the enitire video and everyone in it as racist. Or you're just a moron. Probably both.

 

I say all this with the full realization that you're a demoralized useful idiot.

 

So I get it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevestojan said:

Your “sources” for news are absolutely amazing

No different than Trump's own sources - "I saw it on the TV." Or for Tarheel, "I saw it on the internets."

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

ONE of the sources interviewed by the reporter in Springfield (among the 8 or so interviewed in total) referred to Haitians as sand monkeys.

Oh, well, sorry to have disparaged an entire community of white trash when it was just ONE speaking for them.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, stevestojan said:


Your sources call people sand monkeys and you’re ok with it. 
 

It’s ok to admit when you’ve been duped. I mean you’re going to vote for Trump. It likely happens daily. 
 

But keep sourcing people who scream “sand monkey” at their neighbors. 
 

Filth. 

 

"My source(s)" are the  X account(s) that I cite.

 

The interviewer/X account "sources" are the people he/she interviews.

 

Didn't have an elementary school English lesson my PPP bingo card today.

 

But it's gotta be cut throat I'd imagine breaking into the job market with a desk job in the porn industry.

 

:lol:

Edited by BillsFanNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

"My source(s)" are the  X account(s) that I cite.


 

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

No different than Trump's own sources - "I saw it on the TV." Or for Tarheel, "I saw it on the internets."

Oh, well, sorry to have disparaged an entire community of white trash when it was just ONE speaking for them.

“Speaking for them.”  Haha, in defending them you implicate them. 
Maybe you can find a Peruvian in Cleveland who are a guinea pig. Close enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

⬆️

 

:lol:

 

You are currently here: It's happening, but it's rare.

 

Same narrative evolution. Every. Single.  Time

 

 

 

 


Your lies are hurting Americans. Do you ever stop and think about what you do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold up. Wait. We're debating whether 20k Haitians, with protected status, who are receiving medicare funds, that were flown into the middle of the country bypassing the border, are eating pets? And the main focus of the question is the pets? Not the every other part of the question?

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

20 hours ago, benderbender said:

Hold up. Wait. We're debating whether 20k Haitians, with protected status, who are receiving medicare funds, that were flown into the middle of the country bypassing the border, are eating pets? And the main focus of the question is the pets? Not the every other part of the question?

We are not debating anything. Vance admitted he lied.

 

 The rest of your post I agree with. I said it before talking about the lie it’s distracting from the fact that 20,000 people dropped on a community is causing legit problems that no one is talking about.

 

 The Haitians are there legally and are working, something that about 85%of maga won’t be doing today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2024 at 11:01 AM, benderbender said:

Hold up. Wait. We're debating whether 20k Haitians, with protected status, who are receiving medicare funds, that were flown into the middle of the country bypassing the border, are eating pets? And the main focus of the question is the pets? Not the every other part of the question?

 

Yes, and the left thinks they're winning the narrative by labeling an obviously real portion of the story as a conspiracy theory.

 

The other more serious parts of the story aren't getting onto the radar of people who would have otherwise remained oblivious if not for the cat memes.

 

No, not at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...