Sierra Foothills Posted September 8 Posted September 8 28 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: If von is on a pitch count, he ought to just be released 13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Well you know that is where I was in the spring.... Hold on... if Von plays 30% of snaps and has 7 sacks (and commensurate pressures and hits), that scenario wouldn't justify his contract? I dunno guys. Putting pressure on the QB is pretty important. Quote
MikePJ76 Posted September 8 Posted September 8 just follow the bills beat writers on twitter. When they are announced 400 people post them at the same time on twitter Quote
GunnerBill Posted September 8 Posted September 8 6 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: Hold on... if Von plays 30% of snaps and has 7 sacks (and commensurate pressures and hits), that scenario wouldn't justify his contract? I dunno guys. Putting pressure on the QB is pretty important. 7 sacks doesn't justify his contract. If he gets 10 fair enough. 2 Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 8 Posted September 8 10 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: Hold on... if Von plays 30% of snaps and has 7 sacks (and commensurate pressures and hits), that scenario wouldn't justify his contract? I dunno guys. Putting pressure on the QB is pretty important. 7 sacks? We can get that out of Groot 1 Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted September 8 Posted September 8 1 minute ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: 7 sacks? We can get that out of Groot Let me re-word: I think the difference between 50 team sacks and 43 teams sacks arguably justifies his contract. Quote
No_Matter_What Posted September 8 Posted September 8 14 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: 4/5. Morris and Johnson both up. Olofoshio is the extra sit. Grable in, Van Demark out Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 8 Posted September 8 1 minute ago, Sierra Foothills said: Let me re-word: I think the difference between 50 team sacks and 43 teams sacks arguably justifies his contract. No way man, gonna have to disagree 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted September 8 Posted September 8 30 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said: Grable in, Van Demark out Ah you are right. Apols. I'd taken that one for granted. 3/5. Quote
No_Matter_What Posted September 8 Posted September 8 13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Ah you are right. Apols. I'd taken that one for granted. 3/5. Interesting that Grable already surpassed Van Demark. But from what you wrote about his preseason it is perfectly justified. Anyway, I struggle to see the reason why Clapp was activated. I don't get the concept of having "true vet" on the bench. Van Pran can play, I don't care if he is a rookie or not. Quote
MJS Posted September 8 Posted September 8 5 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting that Grable already surpassed Van Demark. But from what you wrote about his preseason it is perfectly justified. Anyway, I struggle to see the reason why Clapp was activated. I don't get the concept of having "true vet" on the bench. Van Pran can play, I don't care if he is a rookie or not. Maybe they think Clapp is better at this point in time. Quote
GunnerBill Posted September 8 Posted September 8 25 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said: Interesting that Grable already surpassed Van Demark. But from what you wrote about his preseason it is perfectly justified. Anyway, I struggle to see the reason why Clapp was activated. I don't get the concept of having "true vet" on the bench. Van Pran can play, I don't care if he is a rookie or not. They can't elevate Clapp every week. But I understand it week 1. Quote
Big Turk Posted September 8 Posted September 8 Just googling it and checking the twitter feeds that come back? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.