Jump to content

This is so very true


Recommended Posts


 

8 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Nothing about J6 and the Capitol was a protest.  It was an insurrection.  That’s the key.  


That’s the holy grail for those whose prejudices depend on that fake narrative 

 

Only idiots cling to it 

 

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 

then ignores the fact that Jesus was a socialist.  
 


🤣

I already said you’re an idiot 

you don’t have to keep proving it. 
 

.

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, phypon said:

Given that this was so long ago and there are more pertinent things going on today, I really don't want to get into this too much.  It was admitted after the fact that the US intel was wrong.  They never found WMD's.  They were also advised by UN weapon inspectors that there were no WMD's, yet they still pushed that narrative.   For me, it's an example of the "powers that be" duping us to get our support to do their bidding.  It is our responsibility to question the motives of our govt.  It's not that difficult to create a false flag.  There are quite a few examples throughout history.  Gulf of Tonkin and Pearl Harbor spring to mind.

 

Again, not trying to get into this, just answering your questions.

 

You haven't answered the questions posed at all.

 

No surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, B-Man said:


 


That’s the holy grail for those whose prejudices depend on that fake narrative 

 

Only idiots cling to it 

 


🤣

I already said you’re an idiot 

you don’t have to keep proving it. 
 

.

Ahhh, the musings of a cultist.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, phypon said:

Yes, I did.  Read your questions and read my reply again.

 

No, and you can avoid it again.

Not my concern.

 

If the Bush group lied, which means intentional, planned deception, why wouldn't they plant the WMD to make their case?

Incredibly easy to do, yet wasn't.

 

No lie here.

No lie at Pearl harbor, which I noticed you snuck in.

 

And the reason is that they did not "lie." 

Edited by sherpa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

No, and you can avoid it again.

Not my concern.

 

If the Bush group lied, which means intentional, planned deception, why wouldn't they plant the WMD to make their case?

Incredibly easy to do, yet wasn't.

 

No lie here.

No lie at Pearl harbor, which I noticed you snuck in.

 

And the reason is that they did not "lie." 

You can believe whatever "they" tell you if it makes you feel better.  Personally, I question it.  I noticed you didn't mention the Gulf of Tonkin incident that I brought up, which has been well documented as a false flag.  There are other examples from other countries of false flags as well throughout history, so don't try to say it never happens.  Knowing this, everyone should question the govt narrative, especially when it comes to sending our military men and women, sons and daughters, to die for a lie.  Stop being so naive, question things.  You should also question the origins of Covid.  At the very least, give Dwight Eisenhower's farewell speech a listen.  To add to that, listen to RFK's speech from the other day and then look up operation Mockingbird.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Starr-Bills said:

Not the same thing at all. Not at all. They were protesting police violence. Most of the time the police would attack them. Example

 

J6 was an insurrection, masked at a rally to cover their operation. Plan, coordination, weapons, and attack, and at a time to over throw an election. Why? So some fake narcissist, “billionaire” con man could stay in power.
 

Not the same at all.

Get real. The cops did not attack blm and antifa most of the time. The blue city mayor's hobbled the cops from acting. They barely arrested anyone and of those few arrested almost all got off free and clear.

And you're rewriting history such as with the Portland Federal Courthouse. Those maniacs tried to burn down and damage that building every night for weeks on end. If MAGA did that it would have been the 2nd biggest attack on democracy. These anarchist antifa savages? No big deal.

 

What weapons on J6? There were no hand guns, automatic weapons. No protesters fired a shot. As for an insurrection I can't get to that conclusion given they just walked out of the building when asked to do so by Capitol Police. If it was an insurrection it was the most orderly and polite attack ever. Any explanation of what stopped it has never been offered.

You see what happened in Bangladesh recently? Thst's what an insurrection looks  like.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, phypon said:

You can believe whatever "they" tell you if it makes you feel better.  Personally, I question it.  I noticed you didn't mention the Gulf of Tonkin incident that I brought up, which has been well documented as a false flag.  There are other examples from other countries of false flags as well throughout history, so don't try to say it never happens.  Knowing this, everyone should question the govt narrative, especially when it comes to sending our military men and women, sons and daughters, to die for a lie.  Stop being so naive, question things.  You should also question the origins of Covid.  At the very least, give Dwight Eisenhower's farewell speech a listen.  To add to that, listen to RFK's speech from the other day and then look up operation Mockingbird.  

 

You still haven't answered the question.

 

No worries from me.

 

The US did not know about Pearl Harbor.

The US did not know, but should have if there had been reasonable response to evidence the FBI had about 9-11, and WMD in Iraq was thought to be a fact by the US, and other intel agencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Get real. The cops did not attack blm and antifa most of the time. The blue city mayor's hobbled the cops from acting. They barely arrested anyone and of those few arrested almost all got off free and clear.

And you're rewriting history such as with the Portland Federal Courthouse. Those maniacs tried to burn down and damage that building every night for weeks on end. If MAGA did that it would have been the 2nd biggest attack on democracy. These anarchist antifa savages? No big deal.

 

What weapons on J6? There were no hand guns, automatic weapons. No protesters fired a shot. As for an insurrection I can't get to that conclusion given they just walked out of the building when asked to do so by Capitol Police. If it was an insurrection it was the most orderly and polite attack ever. Any explanation of what stopped it has never been offered.

You see what happened in Bangladesh recently? Thst's what an insurrection looks  like.

 

This is orderly and polite?

 

Insurrectionists crush cop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sherpa said:

 

You still haven't answered the question.

 

No worries from me.

 

The US did not know about Pearl Harbor.

The US did not know, but should have if there had been reasonable response to evidence the FBI had about 9-11, and WMD in Iraq was thought to be a fact by the US, and other intel agencies.

I answered your question.

 

I'm just going to post a link here for you.  I'm specifically using NBC as the source because I'm not sure if you would believe any other sources.  If you are going to invade and bomb another country killing your own soldiers as well as citizens of that country, you better damn well be 100% right.  That is not an "oopsie, we were wrong" type of scenario.  Imagine if your home was swatted and your dog was shot and your family was beaten up because they had the wrong address.  Would you give them a pass and say, "well, they 'thought' it was the right address, so it's all good".  Think about it.  Anyway, here is a link to the aftermath of an "oopsie".  Are you saying you are okay with this outcome?

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/iraq-war-numbers-rcna75762

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, phypon said:

I answered your question.

 

I'm just going to post a link here for you.  I'm specifically using NBC as the source because I'm not sure if you would believe any other sources.  If you are going to invade and bomb another country killing your own soldiers as well as citizens of that country, you better damn well be 100% right.  That is not an "oopsie, we were wrong" type of scenario.  Imagine if your home was swatted and your dog was shot and your family was beaten up because they had the wrong address.  Would you give them a pass and say, "well, they 'thought' it was the right address, so it's all good".  Think about it.  Anyway, here is a link to the aftermath of an "oopsie".  Are you saying you are okay with this outcome?

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/iraq-war-numbers-rcna75762

 

 

That doesn't answer the question.

You said they "lied."

I suggested that if indeed lied, they would have placed the proof there.

During and after the regime's fall, they had full access to the real estate and airspace.

If it was a "lie" they most likely would placed the proof to defend against the lie allegation.

 

That is the point I am making, and not interested in going over the value or results, but there was another issued that was involved, and that was it was becoming very obvious we weren't going to maintain no fly zones, but that was far from the reason for the action, just a factor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Get real. The cops did not attack blm and antifa most of the time. The blue city mayor's hobbled the cops from acting. They barely arrested anyone and of those few arrested almost all got off free and clear.

And you're rewriting history such as with the Portland Federal Courthouse. Those maniacs tried to burn down and damage that building every night for weeks on end. If MAGA did that it would have been the 2nd biggest attack on democracy. These anarchist antifa savages? No big deal.

 

What weapons on J6? There were no hand guns, automatic weapons. No protesters fired a shot. As for an insurrection I can't get to that conclusion given they just walked out of the building when asked to do so by Capitol Police. If it was an insurrection it was the most orderly and polite attack ever. Any explanation of what stopped it has never been offered.

You see what happened in Bangladesh recently? Thst's what an insurrection looks  like.

 

Antifa isn’t a thing. Savages nice dehumanizing. Savages protesting police violence against them because of their skin color. The police killed a man, kill many black men. To keep the savages inline.  
 

Police violence - I mean 40 second on google provides dozens of hits. Here is one.

 

J6 Weapons - another 40 seconds on google and 3 minutes perusing the links

 

always minimize the actions I approve of maximize the action of the people I don’t. So my guess you are fine with J6 because like they “didn’t’ have any weapons and eventually they were removed. Just a little ***** on the wall, no big deal.
 

For a bunch of free speech absolutists you sure are agains speech you don’t like. And there is a long history violence against protestors and union members by paid thugs be them private or public. Enjoy your labor protections.
 

and this “did you see” (foreign county) or what so you think of this non-related scenario, proves nothing and distracts. 
 

everyone here loves their opinions (that they get to decide on) sure would be nice if people here provided link to their source material so everyone one could benefit and judge the quality of the source for them selves. But eh let’s scream at the clouds past each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sherpa said:

 

That doesn't answer the question.

You said they "lied."

I suggested that if indeed lied, they would have placed the proof there.

During and after the regime's fall, they had full access to the real estate and airspace.

If it was a "lie" they most likely would placed the proof to defend against the lie allegation.

 

That is the point I am making, and not interested in going over the value or results, but there was another issued that was involved, and that was it was becoming very obvious we weren't going to maintain no fly zones, but that was far from the reason for the action, just a factor. 

The cover up is how most criminals get caught, they had enough cover, besides the work was done, country invaded, why cry over spilled milk. (Opps we invaded for no reason sorry) which was/is their response. 
 

Link one

 

link two

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Starr-Bills said:

A president who also stole the election (brooks brothers). 

 

this you think you re right so that makes you right to spout off is tiring. 
 

 

Are you denying the 2000 election results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

Antifa isn’t a thing. Savages nice dehumanizing. Savages protesting police violence against them because of their skin color. The police killed a man, kill many black men. To keep the savages inline.  
 

Police violence - I mean 40 second on google provides dozens of hits. Here is one.

 

J6 Weapons - another 40 seconds on google and 3 minutes perusing the links

 

always minimize the actions I approve of maximize the action of the people I don’t. So my guess you are fine with J6 because like they “didn’t’ have any weapons and eventually they were removed. Just a little ***** on the wall, no big deal.
 

For a bunch of free speech absolutists you sure are agains speech you don’t like. And there is a long history violence against protestors and union members by paid thugs be them private or public. Enjoy your labor protections.
 

and this “did you see” (foreign county) or what so you think of this non-related scenario, proves nothing and distracts. 
 

everyone here loves their opinions (that they get to decide on) sure would be nice if people here provided link to their source material so everyone one could benefit and judge the quality of the source for them selves. But eh let’s scream at the clouds past each other.

No protester fired a shot at anyone that day. No guns were used by anyone at the event, except the Capitol Police which killed one unarmed protester and aggravated the situation early in the event by firing multiple rounds of rubber bullets into the crowd.

 

Antifa is a real thing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

Antifa isn’t a thing. Savages nice dehumanizing. Savages protesting police violence against them because of their skin color. The police killed a man, kill many black men. To keep the savages inline.  
 

Police violence - I mean 40 second on google provides dozens of hits. Here is one.

 

J6 Weapons - another 40 seconds on google and 3 minutes perusing the links

 

always minimize the actions I approve of maximize the action of the people I don’t. So my guess you are fine with J6 because like they “didn’t’ have any weapons and eventually they were removed. Just a little ***** on the wall, no big deal.
 

For a bunch of free speech absolutists you sure are agains speech you don’t like. And there is a long history violence against protestors and union members by paid thugs be them private or public. Enjoy your labor protections.
 

and this “did you see” (foreign county) or what so you think of this non-related scenario, proves nothing and distracts. 
 

everyone here loves their opinions (that they get to decide on) sure would be nice if people here provided link to their source material so everyone one could benefit and judge the quality of the source for them selves. But eh let’s scream at the clouds past each other.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_City_Antifa

You are a silly goose.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...