GunnerBill Posted August 27 Posted August 27 4 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I know it’s a long shot but I really hope Gore makes the team. How much better is Ty Johnson than Gore? This guy was running the ball behind the back up Oline too. I can’t imagine Ty Johnson ever mattering but I can see a scenario where Gore becomes a really good RB. Take our Chances with the young guy. You can go and get another Ty Johnson off the scrap heap anytime you want. I am with you on this. Ty Johnson is a total JAG, I'd take my chances on the younger guy. It feels like Johnson might be factoring into the kick return battle though which would tilt the thinking. 4 2 Quote
CSBill Posted August 27 Posted August 27 On 8/25/2024 at 7:57 PM, Ethan in Cleveland said: Haven't they done this the last two years? Yes. I bet he gets a nice bonus for "taking one for the team." On 8/25/2024 at 11:43 PM, MiltonWaddams said: I actually posted and ran. Had a wedding reception to attend today Plan better next time. Or you'll be the next cut! 1 Quote
CSBill Posted August 27 Posted August 27 18 hours ago, Mark Vader said: I would take Zach Wilson in a second. Plenty of good potential with him. Not his fault that he got drafted by the Jets. As a bonus, his mom and his mom's best friend come with him. 1 Quote
Saxum Posted August 27 Posted August 27 NFL Cut tracker is very out of date https://www.nfl.com/news/cuts-tracker-nfl-teams-finalize-53-player-rosters-0ap3000000952303 Cuts tracker: NFL teams finalize 53-player rosters Published: Sep 01, 2018 at 04:40 AM Quote
SoCal Deek Posted August 27 Posted August 27 DiNucci is gone already? Not sure what they wanted to see from him but apparently they didn’t see it. Oh well, he’ll be able to tell his grandkids that he started in an NFL game. 1 Quote
bills6969 Posted August 27 Posted August 27 1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said: DiNucci is gone already? Not sure what they wanted to see from him but apparently they didn’t see it. Oh well, he’ll be able to tell his grandkids that he started in an NFL game. I’m assume they only want two QBs on roster and they ain’t cutting Trubisky 1 1 1 1 Quote
Saxum Posted August 27 Posted August 27 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: DiNucci is gone already? Not sure what they wanted to see from him but apparently they didn’t see it. Oh well, he’ll be able to tell his grandkids that he started in an NFL game. DiNucci is more selling his "brand" than football these days and he got some visibility. Quote
Coach Tuesday Posted August 27 Posted August 27 DeNucci is an obvious practice squad add everyone chill. 1 2 1 Quote
SoCal Deek Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 minutes ago, bills6969 said: I’m assume they only want two QBs on roster and they ain’t cutting Trubisky I’m sure you’re correct but it’s just one more example of how utterly meaningless preseason has become …and how the NFL has to increase the roster size. We couldn’t even get out of ONE practice game without our quarterback going down. Quote
DJB Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Lemme guess we keeping a special teams guy instead of Shavers? Man these decisions are frustrating sometimes 2 Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted August 27 Posted August 27 2 minutes ago, DJB said: Lemme guess we keeping a special teams guy instead of Shavers? Man these decisions are frustrating sometimes Shavers IS a special teams guy. 9 1 1 Quote
Realist Posted August 27 Posted August 27 My guess is they only keep 5 receivers then. Thought Shavers would have been WR6. 2 Quote
Roundybout Posted August 27 Posted August 27 13 minutes ago, Punch said: was not that impressed with him in the preseason, especially against Carolina 1 Quote
Slippery Rubber Mats Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Shavers IS a special teams guy. Exactly lol...I promise you in four years or so he's the guy we'll keep in that Gunner God role and we'll cut some ***** young receiver to the howls and consternation of TDB Quote
ROCBillsBeliever Posted August 27 Posted August 27 3 minutes ago, Realist said: My guess is they only keep 5 receivers then. Thought Shavers would have been WR6. I would say there's a slim chance they keep Hamler, because he fills the McKenzie (backup) role. Essentially, he would be the Samuel backup. I fear you're right, though: We keep five, one or two get plucked in waivers, two starters go down in the first three weeks, then Beane is left scrambling and scrapheap-picking... That's my nightmare scenario. 2 1 Quote
BillsFooteball Posted August 27 Posted August 27 Especially with guys dinged up little surprised but not disappointed about shavers. I think the move here is sign a WR that is an upgrade who gets cut. Will see what that brings soon as it’s early but Patrick is upgrade over shavers 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.