Bill from NYC Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 11 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Jones is more a Mike in this scheme than a will. So what is the plan? Play him as a limited athlete at Will? Move Bernard off a great year to Will? Trade Elam for a backup LB? I just don't see the fit. I don't really understand what happened to Elam. I saw him play in college and he bordered upon great. Has he ever done anything really good on the Bills. I don't want to trade him because I am holding out against hope that he will some day turn into the player that he was at Florida. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBBills Fan Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 If they don't plan on using Elan much this year, it makes sense to get some value for him now. I'll let Beane decide that value of that is the direction they are going Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 (edited) Elam is working toward being the 2025 replacement for Douglas. Why trade him now. Jones is a good player, but why would Beane want to take on a new big contract, when he’s worked so hard to get us out of cap hell and they like Williams? Edited August 26 by GASabresIUFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 3 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said: I don't really understand what happened to Elam. I saw him play in college and he bordered upon great. Has he ever done anything really good on the Bills. I don't want to trade him because I am holding out against hope that he will some day turn into the player that he was at Florida. He was always a clunky scheme fit. I was asked on here before that draft to rank the top 7 corners in the class as potential Bills scheme fits. I put Elam 6th. They drafted him on physical profile and trusted they could totally change his playing style. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JP51 Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 (edited) If I am Beane, I am gonna gamble that the upside to Elam is higher than what we could receive in a prospective trade... and roll with it.... now that is not saying it wont flop and we wont be second guessed because that gamble failed... But I have seen enough to say, lets let this play out.... rather that bring in a mediocre player (with cap implications) who needs to learn the system etc... or a day 3 pick. Edited August 26 by JP51 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strive_for_five_guy Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 20 minutes ago, JohnNord said: Sure but the difference is that even though he’s not starting, he’s finally playing closer to the level they envisioned him for him. If this was a Cody Ford situation, it would be different I agree it’s not a Cody Ford situation. I actually think they should flip Elam for best possible pick they can get at this point, but I also get the point that he’s nice depth to have in the CB room. I just think they have other CB depth that they trust just as much, so they’d get better value trading him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Back2Buff Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 51 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: He wants an extension thats the reason why he wants to be traded. I highly doubt someone is going to take him on without paying him. He didn't request a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 15 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: He was always a clunky scheme fit. I was asked on here before that draft to rank the top 7 corners in the class as potential Bills scheme fits. I put Elam 6th. They drafted him on physical profile and trusted they could totally change his playing style. Yeah it was known that he wasn't a good scheme fit but they thought they could fix that overnight. They drafted him expecting a day one starter. And they are trusting that same judgement with Keon Coleman now. But I digress........bottom line is with Benford's injury history and Rasul Douglas aging Elam could easily be starting pretty early in the season and totally change his narrative as a bust. Ingram is more instinctive but the room gets a lot less athletic without Elam and less likely to be able to matchup in man. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dma0034 Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 As this point I'd really only trade Elam for a WR. Even then you can't have too few DBs and I like having Elam ready to come in if Benford or Douglass gets hurt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 Why are we trading Elam? Why not just move a late pick in 2025? They're also projected for 2 comp picks from Davis/Floyd. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 I can't see the Bills even thinking about trading Elam. They need more than three competent CBs (it's the NFL, after all), and given his athleticism and the fact that he seems to have turned a corner, he's extremely valuable to them. There will be injuries -- there always are. Watching teams with really bad CB situations is generally painful to watch. It's considered a premier position for a reason. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo1105 Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 1 hour ago, Bill from NYC said: I don't really understand what happened to Elam. I saw him play in college and he bordered upon great. Has he ever done anything really good on the Bills. I don't want to trade him because I am holding out against hope that he will some day turn into the player that he was at Florida. I think you’re overestimating him in College. He had a good soph season but in his junior season he couldn’t tackle anyone and has always been incredibly grabby at Florida. He didn’t excel in man his junior season and was never a good zone corner further showing his weaknesses when he got to the Bills. He was drafted on tools like size and speed and lineage more than his tape. He was the anti Tre White who didn’t have physical traits but great tape and excellent fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 25 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: I think you’re overestimating him in College. He had a good soph season but in his junior season he couldn’t tackle anyone and has always been incredibly grabby at Florida. He didn’t excel in man his junior season and was never a good zone corner further showing his weaknesses when he got to the Bills. He was drafted on tools like size and speed and lineage more than his tape. He was the anti Tre White who didn’t have physical traits but great tape and excellent fit. I will not argue with you, whereas I don't spend much time looking at corners. That said, he played against great competition in the SEC, and I mean really great. He more than held his own against Alabama. I always assumed that his lack of production on the Bills was due to attitude and/or injuries. Oh and btw, I was less than pleased when McDermott traded up for him. 1 hour ago, GunnerBill said: He was always a clunky scheme fit. I was asked on here before that draft to rank the top 7 corners in the class as potential Bills scheme fits. I put Elam 6th. Good call as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.