Big Blitz Posted August 24 Posted August 24 Correct: He won’t give up your data to the state and help to rig elections for the communists. Here he is with Tucker 1 1
Big Blitz Posted August 24 Author Posted August 24 Pavel Durov left Russia when the government tried to control his social media company, Telegram. But in the end, it wasn’t Putin who arrested him for allowing the public to exercise free speech. It was a western country, a Biden administration ally and enthusiastic NATO member, that locked him away. Pavel Durov sits in a French jail tonight, a living warning to any platform owner who refuses to censor the truth at the behest of governments and intel agencies. Darkness is descending fast on the formerly free world. Here’s our interview with Durov from several months ago:
ChiGoose Posted August 25 Posted August 25 If you can’t enable drug trafficking and child abuse, can you even call it freedom? 2 1
Big Blitz Posted August 25 Author Posted August 25 FYI - this is likely why Google works with the government to spy on you. Nothing to see here. DeMoCrAcY
ChiGoose Posted August 25 Posted August 25 So you guys are defending CSAM here? Mad that freedom of speech doesn’t include allowing people to post child porn?
BillsFanNC Posted August 25 Posted August 25 ⬆️ Will tell you that the US government colluding with private companies to censor journalists and private citizens alike is merely "content moderation" The King. A disgusting waste of skin. 1
Starr-Bills Posted August 25 Posted August 25 14 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Not sure Elmo is happy about being third on this list. Ouch. also look at that. 1-Chinese data mining, 2-Russian owned, 3-owned by Saudi/Russian and Chinese investors, 4-Russian investors… it’s almost as if foreign influence is trying to shape the media landscape to promote far right ideas. Weird. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 25 Posted August 25 7 hours ago, ChiGoose said: If you can’t enable drug trafficking and child abuse, can you even call it freedom? I guess the guy thinks, tell me who these traffickers are, get a warrant, and I'll give you access to their accounts. But if governments wants Carte Blanche access to every account to perform data mining and profile creation exercises while snooping on everyone without establishing any "probable cause" to legally justify their actions forget it. How can anyone concerned with privacy while assisting and cooperating with law enforcement actions protest this approach?
Starr-Bills Posted August 25 Posted August 25 7 hours ago, Big Blitz said: FYI - this is likely why Google works with the government to spy on you. Nothing to see here. DeMoCrAcY Dude, it’s advertising and corporations you need to worry about… which is why they try to make it look like government. Sigh. 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I guess the guy thinks, tell me who these traffickers are, get a warrant, and I'll give you access to their accounts. But if governments wants Carte Blanche access to every account to perform data mining and profile creation exercises while snooping on everyone without establishing any "probable cause" to legally justify their actions forget it. How can anyone concerned with privacy while assisting and cooperating with law enforcement actions protest this approach? Lets look at Epstine’s flight logs again… or all those photos of the felon and Elmo with him and Maxwell to start. 1
ChiGoose Posted August 25 Posted August 25 4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I guess the guy thinks, tell me who these traffickers are, get a warrant, and I'll give you access to their accounts. But if governments wants Carte Blanche access to every account to perform data mining and profile creation exercises while snooping on everyone without establishing any "probable cause" to legally justify their actions forget it. How can anyone concerned with privacy while assisting and cooperating with law enforcement actions protest this approach? Do you know he was willing to turn over people’s accounts or just guessing?
K D Posted August 25 Posted August 25 8 hours ago, ChiGoose said: If you can’t enable drug trafficking and child abuse, can you even call it freedom? The jokes on you, after Trump wins he's going to use these laws to ban all left leaning discussion. If you post anything bad about him you will be thrown in jail for "misinformation." 1
ChiGoose Posted August 25 Posted August 25 1 minute ago, K D said: The jokes on you, after Trump wins he's going to use these laws to ban all left leaning discussion. If you post anything bad about him you will be thrown in jail for "misinformation." “We can’t prosecute child porn because it’s a slippery slope to total government censorship” is certainly a take. Not a good one, though 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted August 25 Posted August 25 Don't ask the King to explain the reliable media reporting on Instagram/Facebook child exploitation and nothing happening to Zuckerberg. I say this because it will happily "explain" with jaw dropping hand waving and bloviating. It's The King for a reason. Musk gives the real explanation.
ChiGoose Posted August 25 Posted August 25 PRO TIP: If you ever find yourself defending child porn: 1. Don’t 2. Take a moment to re-evaluate your life choices and what lead you to this point 1
Recommended Posts