Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Free Speech said:

They were in the discussion before his trade to Dallas. Give up one of two 4ths in 2025 for Lance and a 6th?


I think it’s more likely that Cooper Rush becomes available 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Is there a “fast forward two weeks” button on this message board?

 

I’ll settle for mute, but hoping to just speed up this process.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Posted

I’d welcome an upgrade at QB2 - and it might be a real necessity if Trubisky is out. I don’t know that Dallas is going to give up Lance tho. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Why the Bills haven’t brought in Tannehill for at least a work out is negligent. He is clearly better than any other QB option at this point. 

 

$$$$

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Why the Bills haven’t brought in Tannehill for at least a work out is negligent. He is clearly better than any other QB option at this point. 


I bet he’s going the Josh McCown route and waiting for a starter to get hurt mid season to sign. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 6
Posted
8 minutes ago, CNYfan said:

 

$$$$

 

Yep, pretty obvious, it seems. 

 

Just because someone is on the market doesn’t mean they are a fit for us. People like to pine for names they know. They are not always the best fit for a variety of reasons. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

Sorry guys. I only have enough sports passion to worry about starters. I'll let you guys worry about the backups. Let me know how it goes and what conclusions you come to.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Rigotz said:

Is there a “fast forward two weeks” button on this message board?

 

I’ll settle for mute, but hoping to just speed up this process.

adam sandler GIF

27 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Why the Bills haven’t brought in Tannehill for at least a work out is negligent. He is clearly better than any other QB option at this point. 

He really isn't. He and Trubisky are the same guy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 8/18/2024 at 3:28 PM, Free Speech said:

They were in the discussion before his trade to Dallas. Give up one of two 4ths in 2025 for Lance and a 6th?

I love Free Speech but this is going way to far...

 

.

Edited by HOUSE
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted

Addition to what is said above, I sense Lance may believe the Cowboys starting position may come up if Prescott has another meltdown. Josh's position in far more secure in Buffalo, so he'll be definite back up.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Why the Bills haven’t brought in Tannehill for at least a work out is negligent. He is clearly better than any other QB option at this point. 

Tannehill pry wants either a lot of money to be a backup and/or a place where he has a chance to start.  The Bills can't provide either of those things. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

Absolutely not.

 

Lance has no contract after this year and he has a bunch of issues.

Edited by MikePJ76
Posted
46 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

Yep, pretty obvious, it seems. 

 

Just because someone is on the market doesn’t mean they are a fit for us. People like to pine for names they know. They are not always the best fit for a variety of reasons. 

He can play QB. Not pining for a name. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...