Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting idea, that will cause some problems, but seems like a good idea. 

 

Good: Home ownership increases a person sense of community. People do not litter in a neighborhood they own a home in. Crime goes down, people just feel connected. It helps increase generational wealth

 

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

I like it, good idea, but I’m not sure right now would be the time to implement it. Have to spur construction for a while first or you’re just going to add fuel to an already overheating housing market. Especially on the starter home end, the market is fierce.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

It's a dumb idea.  As has been said, home prices will just increase $25K. 

Oh, so people will see their home equity increase a lot! Darn, she is good! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I think a better solution would be to force funds to sell single family rentals. Then create a rule to allow home buyers first crack at buying homes rather than the all cash investment firms. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is nothing to do with 2008 housing crisis where banks and regulators were so corrupt that the system imploded. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

This is nothing to do with 2008 housing crisis where banks and regulators were so corrupt that the system imploded. 

 

Wrong.  The 2008 housing crisis at it's core happened because people bought homes they couldn't afford and couldn't make payments on.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, Doc said:

It's a dumb idea.  As has been said, home prices will just increase $25K. 

This 1000% ...op is a small minded moron and knows as little about economics as laffy the Kackling clown

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

yet another government handout that; if enacted; I’ll be saying “damn, I wish that was in place x years ago when it would have applied to me!” 😂

 

Also how we gonna pay for dat.  Wait, I already know the answer…

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Bad idea.

 

What we need from both sides is less targeted incentives. Less picking of winners and losers.  If money is good for one group, then it should be good for everyone.

The best way to further divide people in this country is to keep telling them...you get something but you don't get it.  You bought something a year too early, if you would have waited you could have gotten this too.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Where’s the money coming from?  Question that needs to be asked about almost every single one of her handout policies. 
 

Yes, this will likely just raise home prices by both artificially boosting the money supple people have to purchase homes and the likely surge of new home buyers under the plan.

 

By giving folks down payment money, it does bring into scope the worry of a housing crash where people buy homes they can’t afford. 
 

Im not necessarily hardcore against this plan, as I think something needs to be done to level the playing field for millennials/gen z, who have been completely ****ed over by prior generations and corporations like BlackRock when it comes to home ownership.  
 

But every single one of her plans seems to rely on free money and/or government intervention.   Thats a very worrisome, and somewhat predictable, road to travel.  
 

She needs to answer real, substantive questions on how her plans will be subsidized and implemented, because she is honestly playing games with the economic future of this country.  Call her communist, socialist, whatever… I’ll try to have a substantive take on this without labeling, but anyone with any economic sense will look at her proposals and either conclude she’s lying or this is incredibly troubling policy that needs to be thoroughly explained to the voters (but it won’t, because she’s relying on it not being explained). 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

yet another government handout that; if enacted; I’ll be saying “damn, I wish that was in place x years ago when it would have applied to me!” 😂

 

Also how we gonna pay for dat.  Wait, I already know the answer…

 

Pay?

 

It's free money man!

Posted
5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Pay?

 

It's free money man!

ohhhhh.  Right.

9 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 

She needs to answer real, substantive questions on how her plans will be subsidized and implemented, because she is honestly playing games with the economic future of this country.  Call her communist, socialist, whatever… I’ll try to have a substantive take on this without labeling, but anyone with any economic sense will look at her proposals and either conclude she’s lying or this is incredibly troubling policy that needs to be thoroughly explained to the voters (but it won’t, because she’s relying on it not being explained). 

that sounds both racist and not very JOY-filled.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Aside from it sounding like a nice thing to be on the receiving end of, how is it a good idea? 


This is at the core of everything Harris proposes. 
 

She relies on voters (and the media) not asking this question.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Interesting idea, that will cause some problems, but seems like a good idea. 

 

Good: Home ownership increases a person sense of community. People do not litter in a neighborhood they own a home in. Crime goes down, people just feel connected. It helps increase generational wealth

 

 

Thoughts? 

 

 

 

Just more stupidity, will further price out those trying to help.  Idiotic Leftists 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...