gjv Posted August 15 Posted August 15 How realistic is for a wide receiver to join a team at this time and develope a repport with the QB. At best, I see him as a deep bench addition. Quote
Mango Posted August 15 Posted August 15 14 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: Was Corey Davis a better Football player than Corey Feldman was an actor? Quote
oldmanfan Posted August 15 Posted August 15 9 minutes ago, gjv said: How realistic is for a wide receiver to join a team at this time and develope a repport with the QB. At best, I see him as a deep bench addition. We are really just talking about the 5th and 6th spots. Shakir, Samuel, Coleman, and Hollins are the top 4. Plus with Kincaid taking a lot of targets the importance of the #5 and # 6 guy is probably more on special teams than anything. Quote
Not at the table Karlos Posted August 15 Posted August 15 52 minutes ago, dje85 said: Actually, the Redskins signed Martavius Bryant a couple days ago I believe. I really thought this was a joke. That’s crazy. 1 Quote
Bangarang Posted August 15 Posted August 15 The reactions here are weird considering a lot of people were excited for Chase Claypool. Quote
Dillenger4 Posted August 15 Posted August 15 Samuel will be our stud! Just watch boys. Relax, we are gonna pound it this year! GO BILLS Our D is the question. Quote
Never NEVER Give-up Posted August 15 Posted August 15 16 hours ago, Roundybout said: Maybe he just didn’t want to play for the Jets Jets haven't had a QB. They were a mess then and, frankly, are a mess now w/Rodgers and his drama. I would retire if I were on the Jets too! 1 Quote
BillsVet Posted August 15 Posted August 15 59 minutes ago, Gregg said: Shakir was our #1 down the stretch and played well. Kincaid had a good rookie season. If both players can continue to improve and there is no reason to think they won't then our passing attack will be very good with Allen. Next offseason I expect Beane to be aggressive in FA with him having more money to spend unlike this year. If McBeane were confident with their WR group, they wouldn't be making moves or inquiring about street FA's at this point in camp. Because if losing Chase Claypool means you gotta find explore WR's off the street, something is dreadfully amiss. Thing about Kincaid is, they used him close to the LOS and this season that's not going to fly. His 73 receptions averaged 9.2 yards per catch, or among TE's with 20 or more catches ranked 37th of 47. His yards per target was only 7.4, or 24th of 47. For reference, Knox was 40th and 45th respectively. They have to feature Kincaid on deeper routes, because their WR group features no one who is a legit threat. Not MVS, not Hollins, and certainly not Shakir or Samuel. And if you need to bank on Coleman, then that's an issue as well. Quote
Saxum Posted August 15 Posted August 15 Can he play LB? We need another LB more than another WR or RB. 1 Quote
harmonkillebrew Posted August 15 Posted August 15 Really hope we're kicking the tires on the Ayiuk trade option. Doesn't sound like we are though.... Quote
GunnerBill Posted August 15 Posted August 15 9 minutes ago, BillsVet said: If McBeane were confident with their WR group, they wouldn't be making moves or inquiring about street FA's at this point in camp. Because if losing Chase Claypool means you gotta find explore WR's off the street, something is dreadfully amiss. Thing about Kincaid is, they used him close to the LOS and this season that's not going to fly. His 73 receptions averaged 9.2 yards per catch, or among TE's with 20 or more catches ranked 37th of 47. His yards per target was only 7.4, or 24th of 47. For reference, Knox was 40th and 45th respectively. They have to feature Kincaid on deeper routes, because their WR group features no one who is a legit threat. Not MVS, not Hollins, and certainly not Shakir or Samuel. And if you need to bank on Coleman, then that's an issue as well. Kincaid's average depth of target did tick up pretty considerably under Brady as opposed to Dorsey. Was averaging a paltry 3.8 yards depth per target under Dorsey. Was up to 7.2 yards depth per target under Brady. That was one of the positive changes he made on offense. Two big games against the Pats and Steelers (playoffs) skew that a bit but they were two of the last 4 games and even without them it still ticked up more than a yard to 5.2 in the other 7 Brady coached games. 3 Quote
Bigantall Posted August 15 Posted August 15 (edited) we do not need to panic, let Beane do his job and we will see where we are when the season ends. I say the more the merrier lets make these mid level guys have to step up their game and if that happens he will be executive of the year. Edited August 15 by Bigantall wanted to remove a word Quote
MikePJ76 Posted August 15 Posted August 15 2 hours ago, Mango said: I love that he is playing an EVH 5150 Deluxe! Great necks on those guitars. Quote
BillsVet Posted August 15 Posted August 15 26 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Kincaid's average depth of target did tick up pretty considerably under Brady as opposed to Dorsey. Was averaging a paltry 3.8 yards depth per target under Dorsey. Was up to 7.2 yards depth per target under Brady. That was one of the positive changes he made on offense. Two big games against the Pats and Steelers (playoffs) skew that a bit but they were two of the last 4 games and even without them it still ticked up more than a yard to 5.2 in the other 7 Brady coached games. And that's a fair distinction to make as it could point to a change in use for this season. My main point is they now need to feature him Kincaid deeper and his development from Year 1 to 2 is paramount to their offense succeeding. I don't like the emphasis they're placing on Kincaid improving so much. And, Coleman being put into a tough position as, apparently, the X. Can't have him averaging 9.2 yards per catch this year. We will see. 1 Quote
Saxum Posted August 15 Posted August 15 14 minutes ago, Bigantall said: we do not need to panic, let Beane do his job and we will see where we are when the season ends. I say the more the merrier lets make these mid level guys have to step up their game and if that happens he will be executive of the year. I usual panic whenever someone tells me not to panic but that may be due to previous cases when they told me to not panic before a disaster. Quote
GunnerBill Posted August 15 Posted August 15 8 minutes ago, BillsVet said: And that's a fair distinction to make as it could point to a change in use for this season. My main point is they now need to feature him Kincaid deeper and his development from Year 1 to 2 is paramount to their offense succeeding. I don't like the emphasis they're placing on Kincaid improving so much. And, Coleman being put into a tough position as, apparently, the X. Can't have him averaging 9.2 yards per catch this year. We will see. Agree, I was just adding useful context. I do think Kincaid's usage was quite different between the two OCs. But I am totally on board with they have to get Kincaid down the field. 1 Quote
chris heff Posted August 15 Posted August 15 17 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: Was Corey Davis a better Football player than Corey Feldman was an actor? Low bar Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted August 16 Posted August 16 On 8/14/2024 at 9:02 PM, mrags said: You only posted with an attractive librarian for the likes. Quote
mrags Posted August 16 Posted August 16 5 hours ago, Sierra Foothills said: I noticed you didn’t use this Gif I rest my case 1 Quote
BobbyC81 Posted August 17 Posted August 17 On 8/15/2024 at 7:48 AM, harmonkillebrew said: Really hope we're kicking the tires on the Ayiuk trade option. Doesn't sound like we are though.... Aiyuk will sign with the Niners, just like all their other stars that went thru these drawn out negotiations. I don’t know why that team puts their players thru this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.