Tommy Callahan Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: The false equivalency is strong in this one. Remember fox lost one lawsuit already for lying to the tune of $768,000,000 and are being sued for $2,000,000,000 currently for lying. MSNBC did exactly the same thing with maddow. The lawyers argued the narrative was so over the top no same person would believe it's news. And it got tossed. Was maddow and russiagate btw. https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-backs-dismissal-of-defamation-suit-against-rachel-maddow/ Edited July 31 by Tommy Callahan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 7 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Fortunately for all us the old one ear felon is an idiot and can only hire fools to work for him given his past, and they failed. But failing to rob a bank is still a crime. The fact that anyone not looking to dismantle the US government is still supporting him just shows to go how effective lifestyle marketing really is. Its like smoking cigarettes after you’ve had throat cancer. Can anyone translate this case of brain worms for me? 7 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: The false equivalency is strong in this one. Remember fox lost one lawsuit already for lying to the tune of $768,000,000 and are being sued for $2,000,000,000 currently for lying. The funniest part of this whole thread is how you guys can’t use the Internet. fake electors plot Now I’m concerned for your co workers, hopefully your not using an heavy equipment. 😏 CNN had to pay millions because they defamed a high school kid. Lol 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: MSNBC did exactly the same thing with maddow. The lawyers argued the narrative was so over the top no same person would believe it's news. And it got tossed. Was maddow and russiagate btw. https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-backs-dismissal-of-defamation-suit-against-rachel-maddow/ You might want to read the article before posting 🙃 ‘from the article: In a 24-page order Tuesday, U.S. Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. found a six-word statement uttered by Maddow when reporting that an OAN correspondent moonlighted as a freelance reporter for Kremlin-backed Sputnik News was “an obvious exaggeration, cushioned within an undisputed news story.” The George W. Bush appointee added: “The statement could not reasonably be understood to imply an assertion of objective fact, and therefore, does not amount to defamation.” In a segment on her show July 22, 2019, Maddow highlighted a story publishedthe same day by The Daily Beast which revealed OAN’s on-air politics reporter Kristian Rouz simultaneously wrote for Sputnik News. OAN never filed a lawsuit against The Daily Beast or its senior national security correspondent Kevin Poulsen. The facts reported in the story were never disputed. During her segment, Maddow called The Daily Beast article a “sparkly story” and said the Donald Trump-endorsed news network “really literally is paid Russian propaganda.” OAN sued Maddow, Comcast and NBC in the Southern District of California that fall, claiming Maddow’s “Russian propaganda” comment “is false and intended to malign and harm OAN,” a San Diego-based independent news network entirely financed by the Herring family. 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Can anyone translate this case of brain worms for me? CNN had to pay millions because they defamed a high school kid. Lol Hey whee are you going the goal post is over here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 14 minutes ago, phypon said: You mean alternate electors. The only coup that occurred was against Biden and the constituents of the Democrat party. Fake electors. As in the ones the people did not pick 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 2 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: You might want to read the article before posting 🙃 ‘from the article: In a 24-page order Tuesday, U.S. Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. found a six-word statement uttered by Maddow when reporting that an OAN correspondent moonlighted as a freelance reporter for Kremlin-backed Sputnik News was “an obvious exaggeration, cushioned within an undisputed news story.” The George W. Bush appointee added: “The statement could not reasonably be understood to imply an assertion of objective fact, and therefore, does not amount to defamation.” In a segment on her show July 22, 2019, Maddow highlighted a story publishedthe same day by The Daily Beast which revealed OAN’s on-air politics reporter Kristian Rouz simultaneously wrote for Sputnik News. OAN never filed a lawsuit against The Daily Beast or its senior national security correspondent Kevin Poulsen. The facts reported in the story were never disputed. During her segment, Maddow called The Daily Beast article a “sparkly story” and said the Donald Trump-endorsed news network “really literally is paid Russian propaganda.” OAN sued Maddow, Comcast and NBC in the Southern District of California that fall, claiming Maddow’s “Russian propaganda” comment “is false and intended to malign and harm OAN,” a San Diego-based independent news network entirely financed by the Herring family. Hey whee are you going the goal post is over here No comment on the CNN lawsuit? Of course not! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: No comment on the CNN lawsuit? Of course not! What about the cnn lawsuit did you include a link for me to read? Is it related to the false electors, or the fact that fox was sued and lost $786 million for lying on air about the election for months? Maybe you need to take a break. And I’ll make it simple for you. The felon is cheap dumb and lazy. He ruins everything g he touches and stiffs his contractors and workers, hence no one good will work with him. he is also so bad at business he constantly need more cash, and this make is a security risk. finally I was using the cigarettes as a metaphor for MAGA voters who still support someone who is by any objective measure bad for them. maybe I really do need to use Chat GPT to rewrite my posts at a 5th grade level. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 9 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: No comment on the CNN lawsuit? Of course not! Here is a link so you all can read it near as I can tell cnn (and other outlets such as the Washington post among others) defamed this kid. He sided for $275 million and settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. this seems fine and COMPLETELY unrelated to the topic at hand. 🙃 some really don’t understand your point? They made a mistake, got sued and settled. I mean your not disputing that fox made a mistake promoting the “big lie” got sued and settled, kinda proved my point and that the system can work. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 1 minute ago, Starr-Bills said: Here is a link so you all can read it near as I can tell cnn (and other outlets such as the Washington post among others) defamed this kid. He sided for $275 million and settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. this seems fine and COMPLETELY unrelated to the topic at hand. 🙃 some really don’t understand your point? They made a mistake, got sued and settled. I mean your not disputing that fox made a mistake promoting the “big lie” got sued and settled, kinda proved my point and that the system can work. It does prove your point. CNN settled with the kid because they defamed him. That is, broadcast lies in reckless disregard for what the truth is. The kid is vindicated. Fox settled with Dominion because they defamed Dominion. That is, they broadcast lies about it in reckless disregard for what the truth is. Dominion is vindicated. Meaning that the first wave of "election fraud" claims in November 2020 - the one focused on Dominion software "changing the votes" - was utter crap. I don't know about you, but when someone's initial claim is revealed to be utter crap, I tend to disbelieve their fallback claims (vote harvesting! fake ballots!). As I do here. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 9 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Here is a link so you all can read it near as I can tell cnn (and other outlets such as the Washington post among others) defamed this kid. He sided for $275 million and settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. this seems fine and COMPLETELY unrelated to the topic at hand. 🙃 some really don’t understand your point? They made a mistake, got sued and settled. I mean your not disputing that fox made a mistake promoting the “big lie” got sued and settled, kinda proved my point and that the system can work. The made a mistake? Lol God man they knew exactly what they were doing. And they knew you would eat it up without asking questions. 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: It does prove your point. CNN settled with the kid because they defamed him. That is, broadcast lies in reckless disregard for what the truth is. The kid is vindicated. Fox settled with Dominion because they defamed Dominion. That is, they broadcast lies about it in reckless disregard for what the truth is. Dominion is vindicated. Meaning that the first wave of "election fraud" claims in November 2020 - the one focused on Dominion software "changing the votes" - was utter crap. I don't know about you, but when someone's initial claim is revealed to be utter crap, I tend to disbelieve their fallback claims (vote harvesting! fake ballots!). As I do here. Thank you! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 (edited) Weird that there are MAGA mouthpieces that have a simple understanding of pop culture and influencers. Was Ted Nugent ever a star? https://www.showbiz411.com/2024/07/31/right-wing-pundit-warns-trump-not-to-use-d-list-celebs-in-their-fight-against-dems-a-listers “Note for Republicans: Kamala has all of the big name entertainers on her side. All of them. And she hasn’t even pulled out the big guns yet (the Taylor Swift rally appearance will happen soon enough). Please do not try to counter this by parading around a bunch of washed up or obscure entertainers that nobody cares about. That just makes us look sad and irrelevant. Best to bow out of the celebrity competition and argue that we should focus on policy instead. It’s the only hand we have to play. It can work, but you undermine it if you make fun of Meghan Thee Stallion and then two days later start fan girling over some third rate celebrity endorsing Trump. We need consistent messaging on this.” Edited July 31 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 14 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Who? No idea. Tim Walz coined the phrase. Brilliant! Might help his Veep chances. https://www.startribune.com/tim-walz-weird-trump-vance-vivek-ramaswamy/600387271 Doesn't matter who coined it. It's still projection. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 1 minute ago, Doc said: Doesn't matter who coined it. It's still projection. It certainly does matter. He could be VP. He's found a way to beat them at their own game. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 2 hours ago, Starr-Bills said: You might want to read the article before posting 🙃 ‘from the article: In a 24-page order Tuesday, U.S. Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. found a six-word statement uttered by Maddow when reporting that an OAN correspondent moonlighted as a freelance reporter for Kremlin-backed Sputnik News was “an obvious exaggeration, cushioned within an undisputed news story.” The George W. Bush appointee added: “The statement could not reasonably be understood to imply an assertion of objective fact, and therefore, does not amount to defamation.” In a segment on her show July 22, 2019, Maddow highlighted a story publishedthe same day by The Daily Beast which revealed OAN’s on-air politics reporter Kristian Rouz simultaneously wrote for Sputnik News. OAN never filed a lawsuit against The Daily Beast or its senior national security correspondent Kevin Poulsen. The facts reported in the story were never disputed. During her segment, Maddow called The Daily Beast article a “sparkly story” and said the Donald Trump-endorsed news network “really literally is paid Russian propaganda.” OAN sued Maddow, Comcast and NBC in the Southern District of California that fall, claiming Maddow’s “Russian propaganda” comment “is false and intended to malign and harm OAN,” a San Diego-based independent news network entirely financed by the Herring family. Hey whee are you going the goal post is over here Comprehension isn't your strong suit. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: It certainly does matter. He could be VP. He's found a way to beat them at their own game. Lying isn't a new found way for Dems. The Dems have gone even weirder than they already were with their fixation on transgenderism. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Weird that there are MAGA mouthpieces that have a simple understanding of pop culture and influencers. Was Ted Nugent ever a star? https://www.showbiz411.com/2024/07/31/right-wing-pundit-warns-trump-not-to-use-d-list-celebs-in-their-fight-against-dems-a-listers “Note for Republicans: Kamala has all of the big name entertainers on her side. All of them. And she hasn’t even pulled out the big guns yet (the Taylor Swift rally appearance will happen soon enough). Please do not try to counter this by parading around a bunch of washed up or obscure entertainers that nobody cares about. That just makes us look sad and irrelevant. Best to bow out of the celebrity competition and argue that we should focus on policy instead. It’s the only hand we have to play. It can work, but you undermine it if you make fun of Meghan Thee Stallion and then two days later start fan girling over some third rate celebrity endorsing Trump. We need consistent messaging on this.” Yea, stick to ‘policy” the MAGA “strong” point, so much stronger than your washed up celebrities. 18 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Comprehension isn't your strong suit. Wow. I’m not sure you understand what the word comprehension means Edited July 31 by Starr-Bills 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 27 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Yea, stick to ‘policy” the MAGA “strong” point, so much stronger than your washed up celebrities. I’m not sure you understand what the word comprehension means Meghan thee stallion tweaking says hello. Care to outline the dem policies? Start at the southern border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Meghan thee stallion tweaking says hello. Care to outline the dem policies? Start at the southern border. I believe they will start by passing the bipartisan boarder bill. your turn what’s the Republican plan for the boarder (beyond strong and best) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 The longer I live on this planet, the more I understand why roosters start their day screaming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 So seems his policy is to insult his fellow country men at every turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 9 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: I believe they will start by passing the bipartisan boarder bill. your turn what’s the Republican plan for the boarder (beyond strong and best) How bout one without pork in it? Aka Ukraine bill. The Republican plan? Enforcing current immigration laws and deporting all illegals. Btw it's border not boarder. 4 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: So seems his policy is to insult his fellow country men at every turn. Well he could adopt the dem plan, just straight up lie to the American people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts