phypon Posted July 21 Posted July 21 Just now, Backintheday544 said: Because 1) she can pick her VP. Picking Shapiro gives her PA if she’s already in the margin of error. 2) if you look at senate polling, Dem senators in swing states are doing a ton better than Biden. So the switch would likely give her a boost to align with what down ballot polling is showing. Do you want her as the candidate or would you rather have someone else? If so, who would you rather have?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 21 Posted July 21 2 minutes ago, phypon said: They'll make it an open convention. I doubt she will be the candidate. We'll see. You guys won't like that any better if it happens.
GETTOTHE50 Posted July 21 Posted July 21 14 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: In what universe does Harris have ANY rust belt appeal? This about GA VA NV and maybe AZ Ah yes. Arizona, the border state she never visited. Im sure they are anxious to vote for her /not
Roundybout Posted July 21 Posted July 21 1 minute ago, Big Blitz said: Sean is pissing his pants in fear
SCBills Posted July 21 Posted July 21 1 minute ago, Backintheday544 said: Because 1) she can pick her VP. Picking Shapiro gives her PA if she’s already in the margin of error. 2) if you look at senate polling, Dem senators in swing states are doing a ton better than Biden. So the switch would likely give her a boost to align with what down ballot polling is showing. Shapiro would be a smart pick. Not sure Whitmer guarantees Michigan, but I think Shapiro makes PA much, much tougher for Trump/Vance. That being said.. it would be an anomaly as historical evidence shows VP picks typically do not deliver a state. 1
Backintheday544 Posted July 21 Posted July 21 2 minutes ago, phypon said: Do you want her as the candidate or would you rather have someone else? If so, who would you rather have? Id vote for her. But I prefer a Shapiro or Whitmer. I think anyone they chooses though energizes the base more than Biden. My phones been blowing up from my Dem friends about this who haven’t said anything about the election before.
GETTOTHE50 Posted July 21 Posted July 21 If killary couldn’t win, Kumala won’t. Hillary was much more electable than her. Atleast she could string a sentence together. 1 1
Backintheday544 Posted July 21 Posted July 21 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: Shapiro would be a smart pick. Not sure Whitmer guarantees Michigan, but I think Shapiro makes PA much, much tougher for Trump/Vance. That being said.. it would be an anomaly as historical evidence shows VP picks typically do not deliver a state. At the end of the day about 50,000 voters are going to decide this election. If Shapiro gets Harris even another 6,000 votes in PA, that’s a huge number.
BillsFanNC Posted July 21 Posted July 21 A Trump Harris debate will be largely the same as Trump Biden. Instead of the same DEI talking points and fake hoaxes via dementia speak we'll get the same crap via word salads and a fake black accent. When she inevitably invokes J6 Trump should absolutely ask her what she was up to at DNC headquarters on J6 when the pipe bomb was discovered. 4
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 21 Posted July 21 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I think she'll do well. And it aint over til it's over. She's not the candidate yet. Why? Seriously why? She is least popular VP in history, why? 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 21 Posted July 21 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Why? Seriously why? She is least popular VP in history, why? Because she's running against a slimy convicted felon and she's not 81... Edited July 21 by Joe Ferguson forever
Big Blitz Posted July 21 Author Posted July 21 Trump is winning PA putting Shapiro on the ballot who no one knows won’t matter Only the top of the ticket matters. It will be Harris-Moore bc I know how they think. 1
SCBills Posted July 21 Posted July 21 (edited) Will also be interesting to look back in retrospect, if somehow Trump loses this election (and to be clear, he still has to lose it - none of these potential Dems can win it) and if it’s decided by PA/Shapiro… He picked Vance out of a position of strength. He had to know this was coming. Can Vance help deliver in the Rust Belt.. perhaps he will, but Youngkin does in VA what a potential Shapiro VP does in PA. I said above VP picks are typically inconsequential, but … and I don’t really care how this comes off … nobody is voting for Kamala aside from the fact she’s a woman of color. She’s entirely unfit and literally too incompetent to be President. Black. Woman. Abortion. That’s all she has. She is a joke. So, VP may actually be of note for her candidacy. Edited July 21 by SCBills 1
Big Blitz Posted July 21 Author Posted July 21 Just now, boyst said: OP change the title. He wasn't forced to drop. Lol lol. Sure you got it.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 21 Posted July 21 If she's nominated and picks Whitmer, it's 2 female candidates. Not gonna happen but that would be cool. 2
SCBills Posted July 21 Posted July 21 1 minute ago, boyst said: OP change the title. He wasn't forced to drop. Yes, he was. Donors pulled their funding. You can’t run without money. 1 2
Recommended Posts