Jump to content

Harris 2024


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

 

"I find it interesting but I am skeptical" is a good place to be for cellphone tracking data.

 

It definitely has uses, which is why law enforcement and journalists use it. But it has significant pitfalls as well. 

 

 

It's also subject to bad data. As far as I can tell, a lot of it is based on ad tracking from apps. The quality of this data varies wildly and can actually be fraudulent if you have some apps just faking data for clicks and dollars.

 

Professionals can overcome these issues by using other investigative techniques, but partisans basing claims solely on the data aren't being honest about its limitations. And when the *proof* they provide of their claim is just a screenshot of an Excel document with no underlying source of the data, no context, no proof they even have cellphone data, and no supporting evidence, there's no reason to believe there's really anything there but partisan hackery.

Regarding the bolded passage - I have worked in the GPS spacecraft world for quite some time. I can assure you that you are very mistaken. 
 

Regarding everything else - I would like to see data either bunking or debunking. All you have offered is opinion. 
 

edit - thought I bolded a passage but looks like I deleted it instead. 🤦🏼‍♂️

It was the part about GPS accuracy. My apologies. 

Edited by Biden is Mentally Fit
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Incels…dipping into the L Ron bag. Hard to believe that’s a good look. 
 

I find the phone/gps thing interesting but am skeptical. Have you seen something that debunks it? 

It's amazing how some of them use the exact same terms. I had to look what it was when old Ron kept using it.

 

It's weird.  But then again. So are the accounts using it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...