Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 31 Posted October 31 Why? This summer prominent dems were declaring him Rushmore worthy! What is Harris thinking by keeping this spry for his age, mentally fit powerhouse under wraps? Idiot. 3
Tommy Callahan Posted October 31 Posted October 31 As pelosi would say. That's some elite funded AstroTurf 2
ChiGoose Posted October 31 Posted October 31 4 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: As pelosi would say. That's some elite funded AstroTurf This whole phone gps thing is just astrocharts for incels. “Look! There are numbers on an excel sheet! It has to be true!” 1
dgrochester55 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 (edited) The funny thing about this election is that Trump was very beatable but Harris spent the last months following the what not to do playbook. Trump for better or worse was consistent with his message, Harris tried to blend in with what she thought the audience or voters immediately in front of her wanted to hear. Neither did a great job of catering to people outside of their fanbase, but Trump started to do this recently with the Rogan interview and a few other sit down interview in different networks. Trump went on Rogan who would have torn into him mercilessly if he came off poorly and did well enough to win people over. Harris did softball interviews with people favoring her such as the View or Oprah and even tried their patience by doing word salad dances instead of giving straight answers. Trump looks relaxed and like he is having fun out there, Harris comes off as nervous and overwhelmed and speaking in a scared wavering tone in most recent interviews. The people in the middle who may not like either candidate are seeing this. Harris lost a five point lead nationally and a majority of polls in the swing states are in favor of Trump. Only one of them had their boss call the other side garbage, try to guess who. The writing appears to be on the wall. Edited October 31 by dgrochester55
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 31 Posted October 31 54 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: This whole phone gps thing is just astrocharts for incels. “Look! There are numbers on an excel sheet! It has to be true!” Incels…dipping into the L Ron bag. Hard to believe that’s a good look. I find the phone/gps thing interesting but am skeptical. Have you seen something that debunks it? 1
The Frankish Reich Posted October 31 Posted October 31 Britain's leading conservative publication endorses Kamala. In related news, youtube grifter and fake boxer Jake Paul has endorsed Trump. 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 31 Posted October 31 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Britain's leading conservative publication endorses Kamala. In related news, youtube grifter and fake boxer Jake Paul has endorsed Trump. I am 100% confident that neither endorsement will change the cycle. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted October 31 Posted October 31 Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said: I am 100% confident that neither endorsement will change the cycle. Agreed. But sometimes it's not about changing votes. Sometimes it's about why a reasonable, respected, standard Tory (Republican) publication would endorse a liberal Democrat. The Economist's reasons amount to this: the "conservative" candidate - the one who is appropriately wary of radical change - is Kamala. The reckless one is Donald.
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 31 Posted October 31 3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Agreed. But sometimes it's not about changing votes. Sometimes it's about why a reasonable, respected, standard Tory (Republican) publication would endorse a liberal Democrat. The Economist's reasons amount to this: the "conservative" candidate - the one who is appropriately wary of radical change - is Kamala. The reckless one is Donald. Then their reasons are based on what they have heard from anonymous campaign aides or read in the dem party platform. Kamala herself has told us her values haven’t changed. Everyone knows what she is underneath the false campaign veneer. Perhaps not you. In any event, it was more a dig at your claim that the garbage bit wouldn’t change the cycle. That was a horrid bit of prognostication. (Looking forward to your tortured explanation of how you were actually right about that. Should be something). 1
ChiGoose Posted October 31 Posted October 31 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: Incels…dipping into the L Ron bag. Hard to believe that’s a good look. I find the phone/gps thing interesting but am skeptical. Have you seen something that debunks it? "I find it interesting but I am skeptical" is a good place to be for cellphone tracking data. It definitely has uses, which is why law enforcement and journalists use it. But it has significant pitfalls as well. It's not accurate to a very specific degree which can cause confusion on where someone actually is, especially in a dense urban area (are they in the FBI office, the Starbucks next door or the McDonald's across the street?). It's also subject to bad data. As far as I can tell, a lot of it is based on ad tracking from apps. The quality of this data varies wildly and can actually be fraudulent if you have some apps just faking data for clicks and dollars. Professionals can overcome these issues by using other investigative techniques, but partisans basing claims solely on the data aren't being honest about its limitations. And when the *proof* they provide of their claim is just a screenshot of an Excel document with no underlying source of the data, no context, no proof they even have cellphone data, and no supporting evidence, there's no reason to believe there's really anything there but partisan hackery. Edited October 31 by ChiGoose
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 31 Posted October 31 (edited) 2 hours ago, ChiGoose said: "I find it interesting but I am skeptical" is a good place to be for cellphone tracking data. It definitely has uses, which is why law enforcement and journalists use it. But it has significant pitfalls as well. It's also subject to bad data. As far as I can tell, a lot of it is based on ad tracking from apps. The quality of this data varies wildly and can actually be fraudulent if you have some apps just faking data for clicks and dollars. Professionals can overcome these issues by using other investigative techniques, but partisans basing claims solely on the data aren't being honest about its limitations. And when the *proof* they provide of their claim is just a screenshot of an Excel document with no underlying source of the data, no context, no proof they even have cellphone data, and no supporting evidence, there's no reason to believe there's really anything there but partisan hackery. Regarding the bolded passage - I have worked in the GPS spacecraft world for quite some time. I can assure you that you are very mistaken. Regarding everything else - I would like to see data either bunking or debunking. All you have offered is opinion. edit - thought I bolded a passage but looks like I deleted it instead. 🤦🏼♂️ It was the part about GPS accuracy. My apologies. Edited October 31 by Biden is Mentally Fit 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 31 Posted October 31 could 3 southern states go Harris (Va, NC and Ga)? yup, they could. That would be cool. https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/31/politics/cnn-poll-georgia-north-carolina/index.html 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 31 Posted October 31 (edited) kirk and cernovich are freaking out. awesome. https://www.yahoo.com/news/maga-bros-freaking-because-many-145548643.html Edited October 31 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Tommy Callahan Posted October 31 Posted October 31 2 hours ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: Incels…dipping into the L Ron bag. Hard to believe that’s a good look. I find the phone/gps thing interesting but am skeptical. Have you seen something that debunks it? It's amazing how some of them use the exact same terms. I had to look what it was when old Ron kept using it. It's weird. But then again. So are the accounts using it.
Recommended Posts