wnyguy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Your "research" is google and X. Your proof are videos taken completely out of context and already debunked. I'm gonna learn ya something old man. I'm doing it for your benefit before you send money to Nigeria because of a fake family member dying. Everything you read on the internet is not true. Your right wing bubble where you get information from is rife with lies/misinformation. Facts are sometimes hard to accept. Try for your own benefit. You're gonna look pretty foolish when I get that cashiers check for 1.2 million bucks from the exiled King Adammi Olutesuna. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Delusion? Like thinking Biden was lucid? You voted for a ***** zombie. You got duped, no wonder you're so angry. I got duped? How? I'm glad we pushed him aside for the next election. Exactly what I wanted even if the replacement isn't ideal. You don't know what you're talking about as usual. I'll prove it. Aside from immigration, which if it was such a big deal republicans wouldnt have nixed the border deal, what do you blame the Biden admin for? Be specific. If they made things worse, explain which policy decisions made things worse. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Just now, L Ron Burgundy said: I got duped? How? I'm glad we pushed him aside for the next election. Exactly what I wanted even if the replacement isn't ideal. You don't know what you're talking about as usual. I'll prove it. Aside from immigration, which if it was such a big deal republicans wouldnt have nixed the border deal, what do you blame the Biden admin for? Be specific. If they made things worse, explain which policy decisions made things worse. The border deal to allow x amount of illegals in? Terrible bill. Nice try.
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 2 minutes ago, wnyguy said: You're gonna look pretty foolish when I get that cashiers check for 1.2 million bucks from the exiled King Adammi Olutesuna. OK, props that was great. 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The border deal to allow x amount of illegals in? Terrible bill. Nice try. It also would have closed the border once X amount was let in. That's why it was bipartisan with the full backing of border patrol. You know nothing but talking points- as f'n usual. Come on, you have all these complaints about this admin, detail them. I'm waiting. What aside from the border did they do wrong? Give me some policy that hurt us. Just admit you're clueless. I'm embarrassed for you but you have zero self awareness but are likely clueless. 1
OrangeBills Posted October 17 Posted October 17 20 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Biden is still president. You have ZERO proof of widespread fraud. Nothing was stolen, you just believe a conman. Do you think people take your posts seriously? Other than other conspiracy whackos of course the answer is no. Your belief system is not based on proof. Or facts. Or...reality. why should anyone take someone like you seriously? LOL, a woman re-counting was counting MAIL-IN ballots with the same serial numbers that were all in a row, during a court proceeding. I realize your side is not smart enough to understand what that means but there you are
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 4 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: OK, props that was great. It also would have closed the border once X amount was let in. That's why it was bipartisan with the full backing of border patrol. You know nothing but talking points- as f'n usual. Come on, you have all these complaints about this admin, detail them. I'm waiting. What aside from the border did they do wrong? Give me some policy that hurt us. Just admit you're clueless. I'm embarrassed for you but you have zero self awareness but are likely clueless. Close it without letting any in. How about that? You can blame the gop all you want. The truth is it was a bad bill, I'm not even adding in the extra money to Ukraine.
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, OrangeBills said: LOL, a woman re-counting was counting MAIL-IN ballots with the same serial numbers that were all in a row, during a court proceeding. I realize your side is not smart enough to understand what that means but there you are Zero. And big shock Mr Educated is a conspiracy theorist! LOL, you lied didn't you?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Just now, L Ron Burgundy said: Zero. And big shock Mr Educated is a conspiracy theorist! LOL, you lied didn't you? I'm sorry you got picked on in high school. Why take it out on us. Mental midget. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Close it without letting any in. How about that? You can blame the gop all you want. The truth is it was a bad bill, I'm not even adding in the extra money to Ukraine. That's what I thought. You have nothing. You know nothing about the bill. You have no reasons you can articulate at any level WHATSOEVER why you think this admin is a failure. I could legit have that discussion too because there's a lot I do not agree with. But you and your ilk are completely incapable. You know talking points and have zero information behind them. Useless. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 2 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: That's what I thought. You have nothing. You know nothing about the bill. You have no reasons you can articulate at any level WHATSOEVER why you think this admin is a failure. I could legit have that discussion too because there's a lot I do not agree with. But you and your ilk are completely incapable. You know talking points and have zero information behind them. Useless. Is there money for Ukraine in the bill?
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I'm sorry you got picked on in high school. Why take it out on us. Mental midget. Which of these is true? Did you suffer a TBA? Short bus as a kid? Are you a bit slow? I didn't start this. WNY did by insulting another poster. I interjected because of the absurd amount of hypocrisy of a conspiracy theorist calling another poster out. Then here you come thinking you're going to make a point. Put me on ignore you tard. Your replies to my posts are just like your vapid views. Worthless.
ScotSHO Posted October 17 Posted October 17 11 minutes ago, K D said: I don't know about lip reading, but Obama's body language shows me he doesn't want to be in that conversation. And Joe looks desperate for Barry's approval. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Is there money for Ukraine in the bill? Is there money for anything? Do you know how bills are funded? Do you comprehend we're mostly giving them old arms? Is there any reason for this conversation when you know jack about shite?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Just now, L Ron Burgundy said: Is there money for anything? Do you know how bills are funded? Do you comprehend we're mostly giving them old arms? Is there any reason for this conversation when you know jack about shite? The answer to my question was a yes, so stfu. Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The answer to my question was a yes, so stfu. The bill was crap, that was my point. Ukraine doesn't need any more money. Go sit down.
wnyguy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 6 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Which of these is true? Did you suffer a TBA? Short bus as a kid? Are you a bit slow? I didn't start this. WNY did by insulting another poster. I interjected because of the absurd amount of hypocrisy of a conspiracy theorist calling another poster out. Then here you come thinking you're going to make a point. Put me on ignore you tard. Your replies to my posts are just like your vapid views. Worthless. I called him out for sure, he's a troll. And not funny. 1
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The answer to my question was a yes, so stfu. The bill was crap, that was my point. Ukraine doesn't need any more money. Go sit down. Specify. Why was the bill crap? If your only answer was it was letting too many people in, that's meaningless unless you look at the numbers. Why? 1 minute ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Specify. Why was the bill crap? If your only answer was it was letting too many people in, that's meaningless unless you look at the numbers. Why? You are going to be googling like a mofo right now. You are so transparent it's sad. What I don't get, why do you comment here? You have no information aside from the talking points. So why? What does it achieve?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 17 Posted October 17 5 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Specify. Why was the bill crap? If your only answer was it was letting too many people in, that's meaningless unless you look at the numbers. Why? You are going to be googling like a mofo right now. You are so transparent it's sad. What I don't get, why do you comment here? You have no information aside from the talking points. So why? What does it achieve? I already described why it was bad, sorry you can't follow along. You want a bill to pass? Make a better one.
L Ron Burgundy Posted October 17 Posted October 17 While Bundy scrambles through right wing media to figure out his own opinion (saddest f'n thing I've ever seen) let's take a look at what the bill Trump shot down would have provided. One of the key features was the creation of an emergency authority to expel migrants during periods of high border crossings. This provision would allow the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to close parts of the border if encounters exceeded 5,000 migrants per day for a week or 8,500 in a single day, helping manage overwhelming surges at the border. It included a massive financial boost for border agencies, offering nearly $20 billion in emergency funding. This would have expanded detention facilities, increased personnel, and helped border patrol handle the record number of migrant encounters more effectively. Specifically, there was a provision to hire thousands of new asylum officers to speed up the processing of claims, which currently takes years. Here's the best part IMO: The bill aimed to streamline the asylum process by raising the standards for asylum claims and limiting the use of humanitarian parole. Border patrol would have been empowered to act more decisively on removing migrants who didn't meet the heightened asylum criteria, and there would have been fewer legal pathways for parole except in narrow humanitarian cases. 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I already described why it was bad, sorry you can't follow along. You want a bill to pass? Make a better one. LOL, you call that an answer? What were numbers prior if the numbers on the bill were bad? Trump nixed it, Republicans literally helped create it. Everyone "should" know that but you may not. Several even admitted it was Trump. Put me on ignore. I'm not here to educate your stupid asss.
Recommended Posts