wnyguy Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: we don't know that there was from what I'm seeing. NY post says "apparent revision". I don't see any official FBI revision. pls link. I'd be interested in reading from the source. Just for whites and giggles, peruse th site responsible for the "expert" quotes https://crimeresearch.org/about/ Thanks for the link, seems like a very respectable group over there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 (edited) 3 hours ago, wnyguy said: Thanks for the link, seems like a very respectable group over there. Yes, veeery objective and likely to consider both sides of an argument🤫. pure coincidence that their president and research director were both quoted in the same article by Julie Kelly. Edited October 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: Yes, veer objective and likely to consider both sides of an argument🤫. pure cooincidence that their president and research director were both quoted in the same article by Julie Kelly. I found it ironic that the Executive Director is named Laura Liberty, I was looking to see if they had anyone named Freddie Freedom on the staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Anyone that read the original FBI report was made aware that crime was under reported, would be adjusted before year’s end, and that some cities and precincts had not reported. Anyone shocked about this update wasn’t paying attention. Initial report was widely promoted and celebrated even though everyone knew there would be “adjustments”. Now that we have the adjustments, will the results be widely promoted? That's my question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 (edited) 46 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: You said "wood" This was perfectly timed. How did you know Bundy would go there? Maybe the name "Bundy"?🤔 8 minutes ago, wnyguy said: I found it ironic that the Executive Director is named Laura Liberty, I was looking to see if they had anyone named Freddie Freedom on the staff. yes, apparently she does pr. I'm thinking she's probably a looker. Right after her is a Russian....just saying. and then there's this guy: Tim Groseclose is the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics at UCLA. He holds appointments in the political science and economics departments at the university. In 1987, he received his B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Stanford University. In 1992, he received his PhD from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. He is the author of over two dozen scholarly articles as well as the book Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. Maybe he posts on PPP. Edited October 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: This was perfectly timed. How did you know Bundy would go there? Maybe the name "Bundy"?🤔 yes, apparently she does pr. I'm thinking she's probably a looker. Right after her is a Russian....just saying. and then there's this guy: Tim Groseclose is the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics at UCLA. He holds appointments in the political science and economics departments at the university. In 1987, he received his B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Stanford University. In 1992, he received his PhD from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. He is the author of over two dozen scholarly articles as well as the book Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. Now there's a be a book we both should read. You know, expand our horizons 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 28 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Why are the revisions always way below what was originally reported? If you don't have accurate data, why post a job report at all? Because revisions take time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 9 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Now there's a be a book we both should read. You know, expand our horizons I'd rather meet Miss Liberty. I'll bet she's there to make the board meetings more fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 9 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Because revisions take time Why are they being revised? Why not wait to have accurate data? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 2 hours ago, Pokebball said: Anyone that read the original FBI report was made aware that crime was under reported, would be adjusted before year’s end, and that some cities and precincts had not reported. Anyone shocked about this update wasn’t paying attention. Initial report was widely promoted and celebrated even though everyone knew there would be “adjustments”. Now that we have the adjustments, will the results be widely promoted? That's my question. I don't see the adjusted results reported anywhere except by Julie Kelly and those that copied her post nearly verbatim. Are you aware of any reports that confirm her data? @B-Man apparently didn't do his own research on this or at least didn't post his results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: btw, who is responsible for "Realclear investigation"? One might assume it's part of realclear politics. Nope, it's Julie Kelly. not misleading at all... https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/julie_kelly/ The article that has your panties twisted is not a Julie Kelly piece, dumbass. It’s obviously part of realclearpolitics. Your disingenuous nature is more on display as your meds become less effective. She contributes articles. BFD. Show us all where Julie Kelly is responsible for realclearinvestigations beyond her author’s page. Or maybe she’s only partially responsible along with: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/paul_sperry/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/mark_hemingway/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/james_varney/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/lee_fang/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/aaron_mate/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/ben_weingarten/ Such a dipsh*t. Oh, and hang in there big guy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Georgia really wants to stay blue. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 Unfortunately Trumpies are voting early this year too. (But, of course, their early votes are legit whereas Dem early votes are harvested from some cemetery) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 15 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Unfortunately Trumpies are voting early this year too. (But, of course, their early votes are legit whereas Dem early votes are harvested from some cemetery) I voted today. Seemed a D crowd but that's a guess. Saw one D I know well. There was an R " poll watcher" who let us know he was an R. He seemed surprised when we let him know we are D's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I voted today. Seemed a D crowd but that's a guess. Saw one D I know well. There was an R " poll watcher" who let us know he was an R. He seemed surprised when we let him know we are D's. Can confirm you are a D. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: Can confirm you are a D. I thought the man bun and fingernail polish would give me away....kidding. but I did wear a ton of facial bronzer. Edited October 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 (edited) 1 hour ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: The article that has your panties twisted is not a Julie Kelly piece, dumbass. It’s obviously part of realclearpolitics. Your disingenuous nature is more on display as your meds become less effective. She contributes articles. BFD. Show us all where Julie Kelly is responsible for realclearinvestigations beyond her author’s page. Or maybe she’s only partially responsible along with: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/paul_sperry/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/mark_hemingway/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/james_varney/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/lee_fang/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/aaron_mate/ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/ben_weingarten/ Such a dipsh*t. Oh, and hang in there big guy! RCI (the publication, not the timeshare company) employs Julie Kelly as an author https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/julie_kelly/r. Kinda makes me suspicious of RCI ( they weren't good at trading timeshares either) She shared this article widely. The author of this piece is, Jon Lott, is in fact, the president of Crime Prevention research center who quotes himself and his research director, Dr Moody in the piece. Hard to believe, I know. But you are correct that she is not the author. Mea culpa. Edited October 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted October 16 Share Posted October 16 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: RCI (the publication, not the timeshare company) employs Julie Kelly as an author https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/authors/julie_kelly/r. Kinda makes me suspicious of RCI ( they weren't good at trading timeshares either) She shared this article widely. The author of this piece is, Jon Lott, is in fact, the president of Crime Prevention research center who quotes himself and his research director, Dr Moody in the piece. Hard to believe, I know. But you are correct that she is not the author. Mea culpa. the whole Real Clear group turned unreliably partisan a few years ago. Sean Trende, their election analyst, used to be a great source of wisdom. I don't even know if he's there anymore. Lots of garbage now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts