B-Man Posted September 9 Posted September 9 The New York Times Writes Eulogy for Kamala's Momentum by Matt Margolis We’ve been saying for some time now that Kamala Harris’s honeymoon period in the polls would end, and for a while now, we’ve seen her lead shrink in the polling averages and some poor polling for Kamala in battleground states. But a new poll from the New York Times/Siena College shows Trump ahead nationally again. And you can bet the left is flipping out about it. "To me, the result is a bit surprising," writes Nate Cohn of the New York Times, before trying his best to quell panic from the left. "It’s the first lead for Mr. Trump in a major nonpartisan national survey in about a month. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/09/08/the-new-york-times-writes-eulogy-for-kamalas-momentum-n4932349 1
The Frankish Reich Posted September 9 Posted September 9 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: The New York Times Writes Eulogy for Kamala's Momentum by Matt Margolis We’ve been saying for some time now that Kamala Harris’s honeymoon period in the polls would end, and for a while now, we’ve seen her lead shrink in the polling averages and some poor polling for Kamala in battleground states. But a new poll from the New York Times/Siena College shows Trump ahead nationally again. And you can bet the left is flipping out about it. "To me, the result is a bit surprising," writes Nate Cohn of the New York Times, before trying his best to quell panic from the left. "It’s the first lead for Mr. Trump in a major nonpartisan national survey in about a month. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/09/08/the-new-york-times-writes-eulogy-for-kamalas-momentum-n4932349 There is nothing incorrect in this story. It is objective. But it is still silly because it insists on going meta. Kamala's momentum has stalled. The race is now a statistical tie, with the electoral college favoring Trump. We could write that story (the NYT did), and we could cite the NYT story here. But let's quote some guy named "Matt Margolis" pushing out silly content trying to frame it as "NYT upset that Kamala is no longer ahead." It adds nothing. It simply demonstrates how addicted certain people are to the trash alt media spin on every objective fact.
Doc Posted September 12 Posted September 12 2 hours ago, B-Man said: . There's a Ratatouille joke in there somewhere. Like Harris as Linguini and Barry as Remy...
The Frankish Reich Posted September 12 Posted September 12 On 9/10/2024 at 10:40 AM, K D said: My jaw is still well above the floor. Because I've known this for years. Decades even (I live in SF during Willie Brown's tenure)
Doc Posted September 12 Posted September 12 14 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: It was funny hearing her talk about people leaving Trump's rallies early because they were bored.
B-Man Posted September 14 Posted September 14 On Abortion, Kamala Harris Is the Extremist David Harsanyi FTA: Roe concocted a right from ether. And as Trump ham-fistedly noted, it stripped voters and states of the ability to make their own laws or even really debate the science or morality of the issue. But the Trump-appointed justices didn’t “ban” abortion. They handed back the issue, mentioned nowhere in the Constitution or in any tradition — save, perhaps, Baalism — as a fundamental human right, to voters. If Democrats truly believed that third-trimester abortions for convenience are a fundamental “freedom,” as Harris puts it, they wouldn’t smother their rhetoric with euphemisms and lies. Though it’s quite rich hearing Democrats, champions of state intrusions into virtually every orifice of American life, lamenting attacks on individual liberty. Lengthy, but worth reading. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/3152103/on-abortion-kamala-harris-is-the-extremist/ 1
B-Man Posted September 14 Posted September 14 Harris, Walz Muddy the Waters on Their Extreme Abortion Positions by Ashley McGuire “Come on.” That was Vice President Harris’ response to Donald Trump in the presidential debate when he pressed her for any gestational limit on abortion. Would she, he asked, “allow abortion in the eighth month, ninth month, seventh month?” “Come on,” and a smirk. That’s all she had. That’s because that is, in fact, all she and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, have when actually forced to come up with any limits on abortion they would support. They oppose any and all protections for unborn babies and their mothers, including minors, and apparently, babies born alive from botched abortions. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/09/13/harris_walz_muddy_waters_their_extreme_abortion_positions_151621.html 1
Recommended Posts