Jump to content

Harris 2024


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

My God.  It’s entirely the party of abortion.  

 


There is no other reason this party exists.  


MAGA is pro abortion now too!

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/24/trump-abortion-reactions-00176276

 

Trump’s pledge to be ‘great for women and their reproductive rights’ angers advocates

 

Plus they will veto a national abortion ban per JD Vance.

10 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

I appreciate you admitting that cheating in 2022 is fine for Dems. Or is your point that proving 2022 cheating does not prove 2024 cheating despite the guy being the main guy Dems rely on to sign up new voters?


You have to prove cheating occurred in 2022 and there is no proof. Unless you have some hidden proof no one else has ever seen.

Edited by Backintheday544
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/25/kamala-harris-dnc-coalition-unity/

Trump makes this all possible. Democratic capitalists and democratic socialists alike (and many, many people in between) share similar understandings of the threat he poses to the republic. But providing an ongoing narrative that explains such an alliance and keeps it mobilized is a challenge. Harris and her team nailed it in less than a month.

 

Precisely because everyone knows that Harris would be the first female president, and is a woman of Black and South Asian descent, this unifying narrative did not need to dwell on her identity.

On the contrary, the beauty of a patriotism rooted in welcome and neighborliness is that her story becomes exceptional in the way that America itself, at its best, has always been exceptional. Make no mistake: Underlying the unifying chants and flag waving is a serious debate over how patriotism should be defined. The Harris campaign will implicitly be a running argument for the idea that embracing pluralistic democracy, not skin color or blood or longevity of residence, is the true mark of a patriot.

Similarly, Harris is defending a definition of freedom that is two-sided. Critics of an active, empowering government see negative liberty, freedom from government interference, as the freedom that matters.

Harris agrees on limits to government intrusion and nowhere more so than in standing up for reproductive rights. But she is also defending positive liberty, government’s ability to give citizens the freedom to achieve their goals. Hence her vigorous endorsement of Head Start, the Affordable Care Act and the child tax credit. Plus her convention speech’s insistence on “the freedom to live safe from gun violence,” on the right to “live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis” and on government’s role in helping create her “opportunity economy.”

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:

You have to prove cheating occurred in 2022 and there is no proof. Unless you have some hidden proof no one else has ever seen.

That's funny. This is a message board where people exchange opinions, argue about stuff, agree to disagree, tell the other person they're wrong in a civil or sometimes uncivil manner. Its not a detective agency or an investigational organization. Nobody really proves anything. And hypothetically, If anyone provided "proof" of such a thing nobody would change their views anyway.

 

I've been here a while and its safe to say nothing anyone says about anything changes anyone else's mind about what they already believe. So why waste your time, regardless of your views, to build a credible case of something only to get it trashed or have some idiot respond with "hoax"? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


MAGA is pro abortion now too!

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/24/trump-abortion-reactions-00176276

 

Trump’s pledge to be ‘great for women and their reproductive rights’ angers advocates

 

Plus they will veto a national abortion ban per JD Vance.


You have to prove cheating occurred in 2022 and there is no proof. Unless you have some hidden proof no one else has ever seen.

Orlando Timmy imagines a lot of stuff.  So I suspect there's imaginary proof out there.  But only in his mind. 

16 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That's funny. This is a message board where people exchange opinions, argue about stuff, agree to disagree, tell the other person they're wrong in a civil or sometimes uncivil manner. Its not a detective agency or an investigational organization. Nobody really proves anything. And hypothetically, If anyone provided "proof" of such a thing nobody would change their views anyway.

 

I've been here a while and its safe to say nothing anyone says about anything changes anyone else's mind about what they already believe. So why waste your time, regardless of your views, to build a credible case of something only to get it trashed or have some idiot respond with "hoax"? 

Especially about the election fraud hoaxes.  The big problem for people like you, and Orlando Timmy, is that nobody outside of this realm has proved election fraud, either.  In the meantime, people like you quivered and were whipped into a frenzy and did such things as storm the Capitol on January 6 and beat police officers.  I realize that beating police officers and threatening democracy is cool to some of you--especially and including that Phony P guy--but most of us think it's abhorrent.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That's funny. This is a message board where people exchange opinions, argue about stuff, agree to disagree, tell the other person they're wrong in a civil or sometimes uncivil manner. Its not a detective agency or an investigational organization. Nobody really proves anything. And hypothetically, If anyone provided "proof" of such a thing nobody would change their views anyway.

 

I've been here a while and its safe to say nothing anyone says about anything changes anyone else's mind about what they already believe. So why waste your time, regardless of your views, to build a credible case of something only to get it trashed or have some idiot respond with "hoax"? 

The democrat establishment had election malfeasance teed up in the event the election went the wrong in 2020.  Significant warnings on the safety and security of the system were raised, and followed on baseless and manufactured claims of the illegitimacy of the 2016 campaign.  


That’s the world we live in. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Orlando Timmy imagines a lot of stuff.  So I suspect there's imaginary proof out there.  But only in his mind. 

Especially about the election fraud hoaxes.  The big problem for people like you, and Orlando Timmy, is that nobody outside of this realm has proved election fraud, either.  In the meantime, people like you quivered and were whipped into a frenzy and did such things as storm the Capitol on January 6 and beat police officers.  I realize that beating police officers and threatening democracy is cool to some of you--especially and including that Phony P guy--but most of us think it's abhorrent.  

You're either too slow or just stupid enough that it escapes your self-proclaimed superior intellect that the fringe left maniacs are going to full out riot if Trump wins. Not just a few dozen nuts like J6, but thousand of street thugs and criminals on the party payroll. Perhaps Trump win despite the threats and best efforts claiming he cannot be allowed to win. That's how you guys roll. Sore losers. That's not respecting democracy which is what;s expected of the other guy when they lose. But its guaranteed the crybabies will throw a tantrum. And then dismiss it as justified because their weak little minds and emotions were triggered by big bad mean daddy Trump back in charge.

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You're either too slow or just stupid enough that it escapes your self-proclaimed superior intellect that the fringe left maniacs are going to full out riot if Trump wins. Not just a few dozen nuts like J6, but thousand of street thugs and criminals on the party payroll. Perhaps Trump win despite the threats and best efforts claiming he cannot be allowed to win. That's how you guys roll. Sore losers. That's not respecting democracy which is what;s expected of the other guy when they lose. But it’s guaranteed the crybabies will throw a tantrum. And then dismiss it as justified because their weak little minds and emotions were triggered by big bad mean daddy Trump back in charge.

Hoax.  You should pet a dolphin to try to calm down. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/25/kamala-harris-dnc-coalition-unity/

Trump makes this all possible. Democratic capitalists and democratic socialists alike (and many, many people in between) share similar understandings of the threat he poses to the republic. But providing an ongoing narrative that explains such an alliance and keeps it mobilized is a challenge. Harris and her team nailed it in less than a month.

 

Precisely because everyone knows that Harris would be the first female president, and is a woman of Black and South Asian descent, this unifying narrative did not need to dwell on her identity.

On the contrary, the beauty of a patriotism rooted in welcome and neighborliness is that her story becomes exceptional in the way that America itself, at its best, has always been exceptional. Make no mistake: Underlying the unifying chants and flag waving is a serious debate over how patriotism should be defined. The Harris campaign will implicitly be a running argument for the idea that embracing pluralistic democracy, not skin color or blood or longevity of residence, is the true mark of a patriot.

Similarly, Harris is defending a definition of freedom that is two-sided. Critics of an active, empowering government see negative liberty, freedom from government interference, as the freedom that matters.

Harris agrees on limits to government intrusion and nowhere more so than in standing up for reproductive rights. But she is also defending positive liberty, government’s ability to give citizens the freedom to achieve their goals. Hence her vigorous endorsement of Head Start, the Affordable Care Act and the child tax credit. Plus her convention speech’s insistence on “the freedom to live safe from gun violence,” on the right to “live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis” and on government’s role in helping create her “opportunity economy.”

Cumala is white right?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

From a policy perspective, abandoning some degree of GOP policies for the Dem ticket of probably the most left that our country has seen, seems odd for any republican to do. To me anyways.

 

A GOP member can not support/endorse Trump, I can understand that. But abandoning your GOP principles and endorsing a far left ticket speaks more about him than it does Trump. Poor decision on his part.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said:

Ask your boyfriend to turn on the lights and find out.

Can't.  Too busy porking your mom.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...