Backintheday544 Posted August 25 Posted August 25 (edited) I think the interesting part her is besides the small dip and small gain between just before the assassination and Biden dropping out, Trumps been pretty steady around 44/45 percent. That seems to be his ceiling. Edited August 25 by Backintheday544 1
Doc Brown Posted August 25 Posted August 25 5 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: I think the interesting part her is besides the small dip and small gain between just before the assassination and Biden dropping out, Trumps been pretty steady around 44/45 percent. That seems to be his ceiling. He's never gotten above 46.8% of the votes which is why I wanted a different GOP nominee. He has a hard floor and a hard ceiling because well he's Trump.
Backintheday544 Posted August 25 Posted August 25 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said: So you want it to be illegal to own more phones and computers than you can afford? Don’t eat the rich. Looking at it more, it sounds like Republicans are saying they have voter info they shouldn’t have had. The people raided are saying it’s publicly available information. A court has stopped Texas from going through the info until a later hearing. Sounds like a witch hunt. Also this deals with 2022 and has nothing to do with the 2024 election. If the poster would read more than a headline he could properly put it in the right thread. Edited August 25 by Backintheday544
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 25 Posted August 25 (edited) https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4846433-harris-leading-trump-by-7-points-poll/ With independents who do not lean toward either party, Harris still leads Trump, but by a smaller margin, 38 to 33 percent, the poll found. Harris holds a large lead among self-identified liberals, 87 to 10 percent, along with progressives, 93 to 5 percent, and moderates, 62 to 30 percent. Edited August 25 by Joe Ferguson forever
JaCrispy Posted August 26 Posted August 26 30 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: DEI- Didn’t Earn It…😉
Orlando Buffalo Posted August 26 Posted August 26 2 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: So you want it to be illegal to own more phones and computers than you can afford? Don’t eat the rich. Looking at it more, it sounds like Republicans are saying they have voter info they shouldn’t have had. The people raided are saying it’s publicly available information. A court has stopped Texas from going through the info until a later hearing. Sounds like a witch hunt. Also this deals with 2022 and has nothing to do with the 2024 election. If the poster would read more than a headline he could properly put it in the right thread. I appreciate you admitting that cheating in 2022 is fine for Dems. Or is your point that proving 2022 cheating does not prove 2024 cheating despite the guy being the main guy Dems rely on to sign up new voters?
Big Blitz Posted August 26 Posted August 26 My God. It’s entirely the party of abortion. There is no other reason this party exists.
Backintheday544 Posted August 26 Posted August 26 (edited) 10 hours ago, Big Blitz said: My God. It’s entirely the party of abortion. There is no other reason this party exists. MAGA is pro abortion now too! https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/24/trump-abortion-reactions-00176276 Trump’s pledge to be ‘great for women and their reproductive rights’ angers advocates Plus they will veto a national abortion ban per JD Vance. 10 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I appreciate you admitting that cheating in 2022 is fine for Dems. Or is your point that proving 2022 cheating does not prove 2024 cheating despite the guy being the main guy Dems rely on to sign up new voters? You have to prove cheating occurred in 2022 and there is no proof. Unless you have some hidden proof no one else has ever seen. Edited August 26 by Backintheday544 1
Tiberius Posted August 26 Posted August 26 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/25/kamala-harris-dnc-coalition-unity/ Trump makes this all possible. Democratic capitalists and democratic socialists alike (and many, many people in between) share similar understandings of the threat he poses to the republic. But providing an ongoing narrative that explains such an alliance and keeps it mobilized is a challenge. Harris and her team nailed it in less than a month. Precisely because everyone knows that Harris would be the first female president, and is a woman of Black and South Asian descent, this unifying narrative did not need to dwell on her identity. On the contrary, the beauty of a patriotism rooted in welcome and neighborliness is that her story becomes exceptional in the way that America itself, at its best, has always been exceptional. Make no mistake: Underlying the unifying chants and flag waving is a serious debate over how patriotism should be defined. The Harris campaign will implicitly be a running argument for the idea that embracing pluralistic democracy, not skin color or blood or longevity of residence, is the true mark of a patriot. Similarly, Harris is defending a definition of freedom that is two-sided. Critics of an active, empowering government see negative liberty, freedom from government interference, as the freedom that matters. Harris agrees on limits to government intrusion and nowhere more so than in standing up for reproductive rights. But she is also defending positive liberty, government’s ability to give citizens the freedom to achieve their goals. Hence her vigorous endorsement of Head Start, the Affordable Care Act and the child tax credit. Plus her convention speech’s insistence on “the freedom to live safe from gun violence,” on the right to “live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis” and on government’s role in helping create her “opportunity economy.” 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 26 Posted August 26 8 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: You have to prove cheating occurred in 2022 and there is no proof. Unless you have some hidden proof no one else has ever seen. That's funny. This is a message board where people exchange opinions, argue about stuff, agree to disagree, tell the other person they're wrong in a civil or sometimes uncivil manner. Its not a detective agency or an investigational organization. Nobody really proves anything. And hypothetically, If anyone provided "proof" of such a thing nobody would change their views anyway. I've been here a while and its safe to say nothing anyone says about anything changes anyone else's mind about what they already believe. So why waste your time, regardless of your views, to build a credible case of something only to get it trashed or have some idiot respond with "hoax"? 1
Recommended Posts