Jump to content

Harris 2024


Recommended Posts

On 8/19/2024 at 6:24 PM, Big Blitz said:

They’re punting.  They are getting ready for 2028.  
 

 

Something has changed.  

They’re showing that deep red Iowa is what it is.  They’re not changing. Be nice to see something similar reported in a blue state by Fox. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

They’re showing that deep red Iowa is what it is.  They’re not changing. Be nice to see something similar reported in a blue state by Fox. 

Imagine if Don Lemon interviewed people in NJ and asked who they were voting for and why.  What do you think the results would be?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Beast said:

 

 

https://www.aol.com/m-economist-harris-win-november-140032128.html
the devil is in the details. Only on individuals with income of $1 million or more. If your complaining that it’s a wealth tax, that’s different

Capital Gains — Even Unrealized Gains — Could Be Taxed as Regular Income

Shirshikov cited the vice president’s commitment to “closing loopholes that disproportionately benefit high earners,” echoing the language of the White House budget proposal itself.

Since the rich typically rely more on investment income than salary, the budget would tax capital gains at the same rate as regular income for individuals earning $1 million or more and eliminate the so-called carried interest loophole, which the White House budget proposal says “allows some wealthy investment fund managers to pay tax at lower rates than their secretaries,” and close the “‘like-kind exchange loophole’ that lets real estate investors defer tax indefinitely

8 minutes ago, phypon said:

Imagine if Don Lemon interviewed people in NJ and asked who they were voting for and why.  What do you think the results would be?

Sean hannity doing it would be analogous. That would be 😎 

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Vomit 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

The big money.  The msm.  Wall Street.  Fortune 500.

Don’t like it. Support expanding scotus and reversing citizens united. Which side appointed judges on the majority of that awful ruling?  Why would that be the R party line?  We’re just playing by your teams rules 

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Sean hannity doing it would be analogous. That would be 😎 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Don’t like it. Support expanding scotus and reversing citizens united. Which side appointed judges on the majority of that awful ruling?  Why would that be the R party line?  We’re just playing by your teams rules 

 

Yes, I think we should have 200 SCOTUS justices!  Viva la SC!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Beast said:

 

 


In March, the Biden-Harris Administration released its official Fiscal Year 2025 budget proposal which calls for the creation of an annual 25 percent minimum tax on the unrealized gains of individuals with income and assets that exceed $100 million

 

- It only affects people with high assets and income so they should have the ability to pay

 

- SCOTUS had a chance to shoot something like this down in Moore v US this year and they punted.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


In March, the Biden-Harris Administration released its official Fiscal Year 2025 budget proposal which calls for the creation of an annual 25 percent minimum tax on the unrealized gains of individuals with income and assets that exceed $100 million

 

- It only affects people with high assets and income so they should have the ability to pay

 

- SCOTUS had a chance to shoot something like this down in Moore v US this year and they punted.

This is laughable.  The rich will stop investing in the U.S.  They're not stupid.  Now U.S. companies will not have capital to grow the economy, and U.S. can't sell bonds to support the debt load.  Adios Medicare and Social Security.  Next, they will tax cash if the value of the U.S. dollar appreciates.  Sayonara U.S. banking system.   F*cking idiots.   No concept of basic economics.  What a mess.     

 

 

 

Edited by Irv
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Irv said:

This is laughable.  The rich will stop investing in the U.S.  They're not stupid.  Now U.S. companies will not have capital to grow the economy, and U.S. can't sell bonds to support the debt load.  Adios Medicare and Social Security.  F*cking idiots.   

 


US taxes worldwide income. US investors take the money overseas and invest overseas, guess what. They’re still US citizens and taxed.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


US taxes worldwide income. US investors take the money overseas and invest overseas, guess what. They’re still US citizens and taxed.

Laughable.  You think these guys are too dumb to invest overseas without the government seeing it?  Put your empty head back in the sand.  Oh, and what happens if these rich guys take a loss?  They get a tax credit?  This is such a stupid idea.  

 

 

Edited by Irv
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Irv said:

Laughable.  You think these guys are too dumb to invest overseas without the government seeing it?  Put your empty head back in the sand.  


So we invest more in the IRS to stop tax fraud.

 

If the answer to you figuring a way around it is tax fraud then you’re grasping at straws.

 

Not to mention it’s hard to avoid overseas reporting now with FATCA.

 

And do you really think the majority of the  Uber rich will risk jail time just to save some tax?

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...