Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

You're aware that it's all of those deductions and credits that make the tax code complex.....right? (Asking for a friend.)

 

Not sure I understand your point since what you said is exactly what I thought  I was saying. 

 

People conflate a flat tax with tax simplification but they aren't directly related.  Tax simplification is about getting rid of as many deductions and credits as possible, not making the tax rate flat.

 

Of course since higher earners tend to use more deductions and credits it would allow one to make the tax brackets less progressive to keep effective tax rates the same.

Edited by Billy Claude
Posted
3 hours ago, Billy Claude said:

 

Not sure I understand your point since what you said is exactly what I thought  I was saying. 

 

People conflate a flat tax with tax simplification but they aren't directly related.  Tax simplification is about getting rid of as many deductions and credits as possible, not making the tax rate flat.

 

Of course since higher earners tend to use more deductions and credits it would allow one to make the tax brackets less progressive to keep effective tax rates the same.

And flat tax simplifies the tax code….no?  Nobody is in favor of a flat tax that also retains the labyrinth of deductions etc. Nobody! 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

And flat tax simplifies the tax code….no?  Nobody is in favor of a flat tax that also retains the labyrinth of deductions etc. Nobody! 

 

You can eliminate exactly the same labyrinth of deductions etc. while keeping the tax brackets (though obviously the brackets would shift and the rate at each bracket will be lower).  This is what they did with Gephardt-Bradlely in the 1980s. 

 

 

Edited by Billy Claude
Posted
3 hours ago, Billy Claude said:

 

You can eliminate exactly the same labyrinth of deductions etc. while keeping the tax brackets (though obviously the brackets would shift and the rate at each bracket will be lower).  This is what they did with Gephardt-Bradlely in the 1980s. 

 

 

I believe everyone knows that. No idea what stump you’re on here. No offense. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...