BillsFanNC Posted July 22 Author Share Posted July 22 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 22 Author Share Posted July 22 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Outside of a couple instances of gun control political statements, Cheatle is being roasted by both sides of the aisle. There's no way she can not resign at the end of this. She's got no support from Congress and likely a lot of her underlings. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 22 Author Share Posted July 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 44 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Poor Nancy Mace. Tried to pull the female version of the JD Vance pirouette, going from Never Trumper to Trump Humper. Even went all Ozempic on us to gain the great man's attention. (She looks good; now give her a sandwich already) And all for naught. But Hey, Secretary of Labor is out there for those who grandstand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: Poor Nancy Mace. Tried to pull the female version of the JD Vance pirouette, going from Never Trumper to Trump Humper. Even went all Ozempic on us to gain the great man's attention. (She looks good; now give her a sandwich already) And all for naught. But Hey, Secretary of Labor is out there for those who grandstand! WTF are you talking about? Mace was never fat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: Poor Nancy Mace. Tried to pull the female version of the JD Vance pirouette, going from Never Trumper to Trump Humper. Even went all Ozempic on us to gain the great man's attention. (She looks good; now give her a sandwich already) And all for naught. But Hey, Secretary of Labor is out there for those who grandstand! Care to comment on the issues or just deflect from them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K D Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 Just now, wnyguy said: Care to comment on the issues or just deflect from them? Yes. The Ozempic is sadly nonselective, reducing bust size too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niagara Bill Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 Was that Howard Hunt sitting behind her. He was scene on the grassy knoll, in the Watergate Hotel, In the crowd on Jan 6th, and flying a drone on July 13. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 After watching Chestle I am certain that Twitter is a better source than official channels. I have to work through the crap there but at least some of it is true. Nothing Chestle said today is true, because she knows what she is claiming not to know 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 Commies and corporate media: “But who should they make Harris VP?” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 27 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Ladies and Gentlemen, it's official. Our New Deranged Hippo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 At east Cheato didn't cry, yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 8 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Ladies and Gentlemen, it's official. Our New Deranged Hippo. While I'm not inclined to see things this way: we have history of nefarious behavior on the part of government officials, though, don't we Frank? W Bush has been accused of causing a massive amount of death, injury and pain in Iraq by mainstream democrats, for example. LBJ and his crew sent American troops to their demise in Vietnam under very murky circumstances. J Edgar Hoover was certainly not a trustworthy soul, scheming and plotting against Americans of every sort--would it surprise you to hear a couple met their maker at his direction. We're 61 years passed the JFK murder and still, documents remain classified. What's that all about, do ya think? Oh, and let's not forget the ominous words of Chuck Schumer about how the intelligence agencies have six ways from Sunday to get someone. What exactly do you think that means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: While I'm not inclined to see things this way: we have history of nefarious behavior on the part of government officials, though, don't we Frank? W Bush has been accused of causing a massive amount of death, injury and pain in Iraq by mainstream democrats, for example. LBJ and his crew sent American troops to their demise in Vietnam under very murky circumstances. J Edgar Hoover was certainly not a trustworthy soul, scheming and plotting against Americans of every sort--would it surprise you to hear a couple met their maker at his direction. We're 61 years passed the JFK murder and still, documents remain classified. What's that all about, do ya think? Oh, and let's not forget the ominous words of Chuck Schumer about how the intelligence agencies have six ways from Sunday to get someone. What exactly do you think that means? Have you actually looked at what your buddy is posting? Tracking data from advertising firms shows that someone who was at/near the shooter's home also at some point visited a very central location in the middle of Washington, DC. That's it. Nothing else. Even if correct, how preposterous is it to infer something nefarious from this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Have you actually looked at what your buddy is posting? Tracking data from advertising firms shows that someone who was at/near the shooter's home also at some point visited a very central location in the middle of Washington, DC. That's it. Nothing else. Even if correct, how preposterous is it to infer something nefarious from this? I recall a democrat senator suggesting something along the lines of "...the seriousness of the allegation warrants further investigation" when running with some silly claim or another. I also recall Harry Reid commenting "It worked, didn't it?" when he manufactured a lie about a presidential candidate. Finally...Hookers and urine was a mainstream issue just a few years back. Hookers and urine, Frank...hookers and urine. The tweet you're all turned up about may be jv level at best, but not really an outlier in the grand facade of political shenanigans. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted July 22 Share Posted July 22 10 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Hookers and urine was a mainstream issue just a few years back. Hookers and urine, Frank...hookers and urine I never believed that urine part. The hooker part? We've already seen that Trump has no aversion to hookers (err, "adult film actresses," = hooker with a camera on), and I'm not so naive as to think that Stormy was his one and only experience. Still ... a cell phone pinged at the shooters house and also pinged at a very busy location in DC. That's it? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 22 Author Share Posted July 22 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: Tracking movements via voluntary personal tracking devices (cell phones) only works for catching people at the Capitol on J6. Have we learned nothing? You are to believe everything the government tells you without critical thought or question you conspiracy theorists! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts