dickleyjones Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There are elite communists, street communists and everyday garden variety useful idiots. Even Pravda has to sprinkle in some blue sky stuff every now and then to keep the useful idiots useful. Just like with the vast majority of the electorate, there a very few if any card carrying communists among media power brokers. They merely need to be reliable. Which is why an unabashed useful idiot like Finding is such a fan. It would have been more reliable and just as acceptable to say "we can't confirm Trump wrote it, but there are people saying he had a hand in its creation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 8 minutes ago, dickleyjones said: It would have been more reliable and just as acceptable to say "we can't confirm Trump wrote it, but there are people saying he had a hand in its creation." That's what you would say if you want to promote the lie that he wrote it. It's like "we can't confirm he doesn't beat his wife, but..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 22 Author Share Posted August 22 9 minutes ago, dickleyjones said: It would have been more reliable and just as acceptable to say "we can't confirm Trump wrote it, but there are people saying he had a hand in its creation." Right, and there are multiple other outlets that will do exactly that. Then there are many more who will tell you that Trump is the main author. Notice even with this CNN instance their only fact check was about Trump not being listed as an author. That's it. No context of Trump himself saying that he had absolutely nothing to do at all with its creation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dickleyjones Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 6 minutes ago, Doc said: That's what you would say if you want to promote the lie that he wrote it. It's like "we can't confirm he doesn't beat his wife, but..." Yes, exactly what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 1 hour ago, dickleyjones said: Yes, exactly what I mean. No it's not. You said it would be reliable and acceptable to make people believe he wrote it when he had nothing to do with it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 Its just funny to read/see people trying to still use project 25 to scare people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 23 Author Share Posted August 23 Apparently Matt Walsh left these cards all around at the DNC. Project2025.com and the QR code on the back takes you to a website for his movie. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 It was proba 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Apparently Matt Walsh left these cards all around at the DNC. Project2025.com and the QR code on the back takes you to a website for his movie. Sections of Project 2025 assert that a liberal entrenched bureaucracy in Washington inhibited and sabotaged the 1st Trump administration's efforts at enacting policies and reforms. This is truth. And that in order to facilitate the campaign objectives of a new administration, that bureaucracy needs to be replaced. Otherwise they'll inhibit a 2024 administration as they did a 2016 one. This is true too. So specific to this, the objection to Project 2025 is that its not okay to put people into government positions that will carry out the objectives and plans of the elected government? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted August 23 Author Share Posted August 23 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: It was proba Sections of Project 2025 assert that a liberal entrenched bureaucracy in Washington inhibited and sabotaged the 1st Trump administration's efforts at enacting policies and reforms. This is truth. And that in order to facilitate the campaign objectives of a new administration, that bureaucracy needs to be replaced. Otherwise they'll inhibit a 2024 administration as they did a 2016 one. This is true too. So specific to this, the objection to Project 2025 is that its not okay to put people into government positions that will carry out the objectives and plans of the elected government? I think Trump has also stated that he does in fact agree with some of the proposals in Project 2025 even though he had nothing to do with producing it. Astonishing that Trump might agree with some policies proposed by a conservative think tank. Keyword: some. Otherwise it's great to know that we can attach any and all wacky policies coming out of the Brookings institute to dems. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 23 Share Posted August 23 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: I think Trump has also stated that he does in fact agree with some of the proposals in Project 2025 even though he had nothing to do with producing it. Astonishing that Trump might agree with some policies proposed by a conservative think tank. Keyword: some. Otherwise it's great to know that we can attach any and all wacky policies coming out of the Brookings institute to dems. its all part of the Democrats campaign strategy of make-believe. The biggest part of which is gaslighting voters that everything which happened in the past 4 years is Trump's fault because through some magic trick to create an alternate reality, he's been running the country and not Biden/Harris. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts