Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Schoen had no choice regarding the Barkley situation.  His big mistake was the Jones contract in the first place.  How do you look at that guy and think he is the answer for the franchise?  But he did, and now he's trying to support him.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, eball said:

Schoen had no choice regarding the Barkley situation.  His big mistake was the Jones contract in the first place.  How do you look at that guy and think he is the answer for the franchise?  But he did, and now he's trying to support him.

 


Agreed he should have cut bait immediately and told Mara he needed to start over.

 

Now he’s hitched his wagon to him and inevitably will have to have the conversation about how he wasted the owners money and needs to draft a new guy. 
 

Huge blunder 

Posted
26 minutes ago, DJB said:


Agreed he should have cut bait immediately and told Mara he needed to start over.

 

Now he’s hitched his wagon to him and inevitably will have to have the conversation about how he wasted the owners money and needs to draft a new guy. 
 

Huge blunder 

I think Mara wanted Jones more than Schoen and Daboll did.

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, eball said:

Schoen had no choice regarding the Barkley situation.  His big mistake was the Jones contract in the first place.  How do you look at that guy and think he is the answer for the franchise?  But he did, and now he's trying to support him.

 

Agreed, he was basically put in a no win situation, to me it is like extending a long term Tua contract.

Posted
5 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

Wow!  Wonder why the Panthers didn't jump on that.

Supposedly the bears first asked for burns in the trade to get the number one pick and the panthers countered with dj Moore

 

Ended with Bryce Young and neither of them 

Posted
8 hours ago, Rubes said:

Here's Morgan, Schoen, and Beane, three once-Bills GMs, talking about trading up to 6 in the draft while at the Senior Bowl.

 

 


wow, Burns really has the Von-in his prime ghost move down pat. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said:

this is so far off on Dallas.

Is it?


in 2020, they went WR and CB with their first two picks. Despite having Amari Cooper and Michael Gallup at WR.

 

2 years later, Cooper is gone and they have their new #1 WR already in place.

 

In 2021, they went BPA at pick kne and took Micah Parson, a superstar EDGE.

 

In 2022, they took an OT/OG in the first, despite having Tyron Smith playing at an excellent level. Of course, he got hurt and then eventually left, and they have their replacement already there.

 

In 2024, they drafted ANOTHER OT in first, despite all of that above. Why? Because they focus on premium players at premium positions. Because they realize that needs change fast in the NFL, and players at OT/WR/CB are ALWAYS gonna get paid.

 

It’s easy to say, “oh we lost our left tackle/WR, let’s just draft one.” A child could do that. 
 

It’s smart to say, “let’s draft an OT we really like now and we are safe if something happens in the next year or two and we have to cut ties with Tyron Smith”

 

The Bills go, “oh man, we don’t have anyone at WR, we better draft one high.”

 

or in 2021, “oh man, we don’t have anyone at CB, we better draft one high.”

 

That strategy can work despite itself, and all teams do a little bit of it, but it’s a bad drafting strategy overall. It’s how you end up always playing catch up at the big time positions. 
 

49ers saw a potentially divorce with their stellar WR group. Took one they liked in the first to get ahead of it. Proactive.

 

Bills had to take a WR because they painted themselves into a corner and had no other choice. Reactive.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said:

And  you know from experience


Matt, I simply stated my preference is to not watch these kind of shows.  I was forced when married to watch in bed the reality shows my ex-wife liked, amd that’s fine when you love someone.  I’ve never seen value in these types of shows.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

Can you list what, in your opinion, constitute the "smart teams" that in your opinion, consistently draft players at high impact positions before they become crippling needs?

 

Thanks

 

The best example is Green Bay. They've drafted their last 2 QBs in the 1st round years before they needed them to play. Both times they had a HOF QB with tread left on his tires. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
On 7/3/2024 at 10:52 AM, Rubes said:

Here's Morgan, Schoen, and Beane, three once-Bills GMs, talking about trading up to 6 in the draft while at the Senior Bowl.

 

 


Beane already has 2 NFL GMs under his tree. Pretty impressive so far 

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 7/3/2024 at 6:54 PM, FireChans said:

Is it?


in 2020, they went WR and CB with their first two picks. Despite having Amari Cooper and Michael Gallup at WR.

 

2 years later, Cooper is gone and they have their new #1 WR already in place.

 

In 2021, they went BPA at pick kne and took Micah Parson, a superstar EDGE.

 

In 2022, they took an OT/OG in the first, despite having Tyron Smith playing at an excellent level. Of course, he got hurt and then eventually left, and they have their replacement already there.

 

In 2024, they drafted ANOTHER OT in first, despite all of that above. Why? Because they focus on premium players at premium positions. Because they realize that needs change fast in the NFL, and players at OT/WR/CB are ALWAYS gonna get paid.

 

It’s easy to say, “oh we lost our left tackle/WR, let’s just draft one.” A child could do that. 
 

It’s smart to say, “let’s draft an OT we really like now and we are safe if something happens in the next year or two and we have to cut ties with Tyron Smith”

 

The Bills go, “oh man, we don’t have anyone at WR, we better draft one high.”

 

or in 2021, “oh man, we don’t have anyone at CB, we better draft one high.”

 

That strategy can work despite itself, and all teams do a little bit of it, but it’s a bad drafting strategy overall. It’s how you end up always playing catch up at the big time positions. 
 

49ers saw a potentially divorce with their stellar WR group. Took one they liked in the first to get ahead of it. Proactive.

 

Bills had to take a WR because they painted themselves into a corner and had no other choice. Reactive.

ok.  The cowboys have been looking for safeties for over a decade, they have been trying to put together a wr core made up of draft picks for a long time, they can not draft or develop a DT to save their life.  As far as tyron smith goes he is hurt every year and has been a major problem for them late in the season because of his injuries.  They finally drafted a guy to play there and he is actually their left guard.  They went through a lot of really bad players over there before they drafted smith two years ago.

 

They have had some great players fall into their laps in the first round through the years much like baltimore.  Dez bryant, lamb, parsons.  Mostly because of other teams decisions.

 

The Bills are just fine.  This obsession with WR here is bananas.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/3/2024 at 5:15 PM, RoyBatty is alive said:

Agreed, he was basically put in a no win situation, to me it is like extending a long term Tua contract.

It is not really close, Jones has had like 15 TD passes max in a season.

Posted
1 hour ago, MikePJ76 said:

ok.  The cowboys have been looking for safeties for over a decade, they have been trying to put together a wr core made up of draft picks for a long time, they can not draft or develop a DT to save their life.  As far as tyron smith goes he is hurt every year and has been a major problem for them late in the season because of his injuries.  They finally drafted a guy to play there and he is actually their left guard.  They went through a lot of really bad players over there before they drafted smith two years ago.

 

They have had some great players fall into their laps in the first round through the years much like baltimore.  Dez bryant, lamb, parsons.  Mostly because of other teams decisions.

 

The Bills are just fine.  This obsession with WR here is bananas.  

The bolded has nothing to do with what I said. Like zero.

 

For a team that has been trying to find a safety, it’s telling that they haven’t drafted one high in years and years. You know why? Because it’s bad value. 

 

I’m not sure you are following the argument at all.

 

Tyron Smith had been hurt on and off but played 11 games the year before they drafted Smith. Some teams may have said it was just bad luck. The Cowboys saw the writing on the wall. Good for them.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
8 hours ago, Dr Krentist said:

The Bills will finally be on Hard Knocks. They play the Bears week 1 of the preseason.

If we're going by that metric they were on it last year for the last game against the Dolphins.

Posted
2 hours ago, Warcodered said:

If we're going by that metric they were on it last year for the last game against the Dolphins.

I totally forgot the Dolphins were on the in-season version of Hard Knocks.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...