Jump to content

Raiders HC Antonio Pierce faces civil judgements totaling 28 million


Gregg

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, stuvian said:

 

apparently it's genetic. Al drafted Jamarcus Russell

Don’t forget he was paid too before the rookie wage scale was approved—so the Raiders had to pay him through the nose for that hot mess on the field lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2024 at 9:59 AM, Augie said:

 

As an investor, I would never give an unlimited personal guarantee. As a lender, I would never make the loan without the personal guarantee. That is Lending 101. You don’t give them the money unless you know they are fully committed and can’t just wash their hands and walk away. 

but the personal guarantee must be reasonable and not lead to personal financial ruin if the business fails, as that happens often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cba fan said:

but the personal guarantee must be reasonable and not lead to personal financial ruin if the business fails, as that happens often.

 

According to whom? It is what it you, you guarantee the debt and you are responsible. For all of it, even if there are other guarantors you personally are jointly and severally liable for the entire amount.  There is no “reasonable” limitation. That’s why you don’t take it lightly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2024 at 9:07 AM, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

The Raiders have been truly a snakebitten franchise for the duration of Junior's rulership since taking over for Al. Is it coincidence or dumb leadership decisions?


at some point you can’t keep leaning on bad luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2024 at 7:16 AM, Big Turk said:

Oh man...that's business 101...you never guarantee business assets with personal guarantees that open you up for liability outside the business itself.  That's the whole point of having a business entity to begin with...to protect YOU PERSONALLY from this type of stuff.  How the hell did his business attorneys allow this?

 

 

I'm guessing they were in a situation where they couldn't borrow the money to open the dealership without personal guarantees.   Without the guarantees, the effort to buy/build the dealership would have collapsed.  Hungry to make the deal happen, Pierce signed the guarantee.  

 

It's not clear to me if Peirce was the only one to sign a guarantee.  

 

There's nothing criminal or underhanded here.  Just a catastrophic business failure.  From the sounds of it, Pierce is screwed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...