Rampant Buffalo Posted August 10 Posted August 10 On 8/2/2024 at 6:25 PM, Mr. WEO said: is "pizza" all sports? just football? just pro football? just NFL branded pro football? One large corporation does not own football teams. They are actually called "franchises"--like, say a national pizza chain has franchisees. Is there a local pizza brand affiliate that has an agreement with the national company where the local affiliate has to provide free pizza every Sunday/sometimes Monday night and Thursday too? Do they also force free local pizza eaters to buy their special menu pizza package to get even MORE pizza? no. they do not. this is a failure of comparison on every level. You are getting lost in the details. Pizza and football are both things people enjoy. Neither is a necessity. That is the big picture, and is the basis for my comparison. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted August 10 Posted August 10 21 minutes ago, Rampant Buffalo said: You are getting lost in the details. Pizza and football are both things people enjoy. Neither is a necessity. That is the big picture, and is the basis for my comparison. none of this changes the fact that your argument makes no sense Quote
Rampant Buffalo Posted August 10 Posted August 10 2 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: none of this changes the fact that your argument makes no sense Really? What is your basis for making this claim? Quote
Mr. WEO Posted August 10 Posted August 10 9 hours ago, Rampant Buffalo said: Really? What is your basis for making this claim? reread my responses to prior posts Quote
Rampant Buffalo Posted August 11 Posted August 11 On 8/10/2024 at 8:56 AM, Mr. WEO said: reread my responses to prior posts Not worth rereading. 1 Quote
benderbender Posted August 12 Posted August 12 The jury found the NFL liable. They specifically found the NFL overcharged. The rest is haggling over the amount. However, the NFL has the best lawyers money can buy. So they used the old "that depends on what the definition of 'is' is" about the term direct to consumer. It's what money can buy. And for a "non-profit," they spend the GDP of a South American country on lawyers. Probably nothing shady about that. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted August 12 Posted August 12 14 hours ago, benderbender said: The jury found the NFL liable. They specifically found the NFL overcharged. The rest is haggling over the amount. However, the NFL has the best lawyers money can buy. So they used the old "that depends on what the definition of 'is' is" about the term direct to consumer. It's what money can buy. And for a "non-profit," they spend the GDP of a South American country on lawyers. Probably nothing shady about that. how did that work out? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.