GoBills808 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 1 minute ago, RyanC883 said: with a 1st round pick, yeah. And McCarthy has about 1000 questions around him. Not a sure-fire NFL starter. well having Jefferson/Addison/Hockenson to throw at can only help these moves don't get made in a vacuum. 1 Quote
RyanC883 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Just now, GoBills808 said: well having Jefferson/Addison/Hockenson to throw at can only help these moves don't get made in a vacuum. agree the WR room is stocked. But that Jefferson money becomes an issue very quickly if wins don't follow. No money for Addison/Hockenson when their Ks are up, or money for FA OL, DL, etc. Quote
mrags Posted June 3 Posted June 3 3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Yeah I come here just for that. You and me both. Quote
MikePJ76 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 1 minute ago, GoBills808 said: drafting elite talent at important positions and then paying them top money/trading them for picks is what your FO should aspire to unless you are one of those that thinks WRs are the new RB Absolutely. The saying in the scouting world is you have to find talent, you have to draft talent, you have to develop talent and then you have to sign the talent long term. Not sure what this has to do with anything I have said though. Quote
GoBills808 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 1 minute ago, RyanC883 said: agree the WR room is stocked. But that Jefferson money becomes an issue very quickly if wins don't follow. No money for Addison/Hockenson when their Ks are up, or money for FA OL, DL, etc. i mean what kind of wins are we talking about...i think you can say the same for every team in the league except the chiefs is no team supposed to pay anybody? how are teams supposed to get better Quote
mrags Posted June 3 Posted June 3 3 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: So.....He's not coming to Buffalo? Not with this run first, ground and pound offense that McDooper is creating Quote
Chandler#81 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 2 hours ago, nbbillsfan said: Will the bengals be able to pay Chase and Burrow? Good question. Since the RB has been reduced dramatically recently, WRs have reaped the benefit. No, I don’t think they can because, like us, the reached a high level before the RB implosion and new $$ kicked in. jmo. Quote
BuffaloBill Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Seems like crazy numbers that will likely haunt the team. It’s tough to say as letting talent like that walk is also tough. Quote
billsfan89 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Just now, mrags said: Yet they still haven’t addressed the WR position in the draft. 1 guy in rd 2 is not addressing the position imo They got a pass catcher in round 1 last year in Kincaid. So back to back years their top picks have been a pass catcher. It's a good start especially when they have a nice mid-round find in Shakir and signed a solid mid-level WR free agent in Samuel. I do agree that they maybe could have done more in terms of WR in the draft. I wouldn't have minded Troy Franklin in round 3 to help add some speed to the WR core. But I also think the difference year 1 between Franklin and MVS is likely to be marginal. We aren't too far apart on opinion here but I am mostly saying that the front office appears to have shifted in philosophy with drafting 3 out of their last 4 picks in rounds 1-2 on offense. I also think resigning Dawkins was their biggest extension of the off-season and they also made two very savvy acquisitions in the mid round this year with SVPG and Davis both of whom I think will fit nicely on the offense. 3 Quote
MikePJ76 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 6 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: well having Jefferson/Addison/Hockenson to throw at can only help these moves don't get made in a vacuum. and much like Houston the system they run is built to be as logan paulson said about Shanahan's offense, if the qb has any idea what he is doing the offense is idiot proof. the vikings run McVay's version of Shanahan's offense. They will be good on offense if the QB is just average. 9 minutes ago, mrags said: Not with this run first, ground and pound offense that McDooper is creating The Bills in no way are a ground and pound offense. They as a unit...O-Line, Backs and Tight Ends should have an excellent running game though. Quote
GoBills808 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 2 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: and much like Houston the system they run is built to be as logan paulson said about Shanahan's offense, if the qb has any idea what he is doing the offense is idiot proof. the vikings run McVay's version of Shanahan's offense. They will be good on offense if the QB is just average. you are referring to mike as opposed to kyle i assume regardless, even the top offensive minds in the game concede you need significant talent on that side of the ball...there is a lot of football that just comes down to beating the guy lining up from you Quote
mrags Posted June 3 Posted June 3 4 minutes ago, billsfan89 said: They got a pass catcher in round 1 last year in Kincaid. So back to back years their top picks have been a pass catcher. It's a good start especially when they have a nice mid-round find in Shakir and signed a solid mid-level WR free agent in Samuel. I do agree that they maybe could have done more in terms of WR in the draft. I wouldn't have minded Troy Franklin in round 3 to help add some speed to the WR core. But I also think the difference year 1 between Franklin and MVS is likely to be marginal. We aren't too far apart on opinion here but I am mostly saying that the front office appears to have shifted in philosophy with drafting 3 out of their last 4 picks in rounds 1-2 on offense. I also think resigning Dawkins was their biggest extension of the off-season and they also made two very savvy acquisitions in the mid round this year with SVPG and Davis both of whom I think will fit nicely on the offense. I LOVE SVPG!!! Really like Davis. And I do agree that in year 1 of rookie Franklin or anyone else for that matter (Coleman included) won’t make a difference. At least not one as much as MVS or even Claypool imo (assuming he gets his head in straight). But I’m not talking about 1 year. I’m talking g about the future of this team. We got ourselves in trouble because of this. Guys like Miller never materialized to what we needed. A different approach is needed. Even though a complete overhaul was NEEDED in the WR room imo, we did it in a way that made no sense. Quote
mrags Posted June 3 Posted June 3 5 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: and much like Houston the system they run is built to be as logan paulson said about Shanahan's offense, if the qb has any idea what he is doing the offense is idiot proof. the vikings run McVay's version of Shanahan's offense. They will be good on offense if the QB is just average. The Bills in no way are a ground and pound offense. They as a unit...O-Line, Backs and Tight Ends should have an excellent running game though. They aren’t going to be a power run offense. But they are going to a run heavy team imo. Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted June 3 Posted June 3 37 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said: absurd to pay a non-QB that much money I think it depends. The Vikings are in a perfect position to pay a WR that kind of money. 1 Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: I think it depends. The Vikings are in a perfect position to pay a WR that kind of money. if you have no qb it's an even worse idea. 1 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Just now, Pine Barrens Mafia said: if you have no qb it's an even worse idea. They have a QB they’re developing. That’s exactly what you want for him. Quote
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: They have a QB they’re developing. That’s exactly what you want for him. We'll see how it works out for them. Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted June 3 Posted June 3 Jefferson actually got less than Hill in terms of cap %. Thats interesting. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.