BillsFanNC Posted June 2, 2024 Posted June 2, 2024 (edited) Another way Marxists "save our democracy..." Encouraging unelected bureaucrats to punish elected representatives of the people... Wholesome. American. Like apple pie. Thank God we have these people to "save democracy" Edited February 2 by BillsFanNC 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 23 Author Posted January 23 Let's remember when Chuckie said the quiet part out loud.... 1
T master Posted February 2 Posted February 2 (edited) On 1/23/2025 at 8:04 AM, BillsFanNC said: Let's remember when Chuckie said the quiet part out loud.... I totally believe it ! Years ago i use to call senators and congress members in DC if i thought my opinion didn't line up with where they wanted to go on certain subjects, I was never nasty, never cussed, but that year i called probably more than 20 phone calls to voice my opinion . That same year which was the only time in my entire life that the IRS held my refund check for almost the entire next year, my CPA wrote 3 letters to the IRS and called multiple times to ask why they were holding my refund they said they would get back to him on it and never did then one day out of the blue my refund was deposited in my account . I told this to a very liberal person at work and they said OH it's just a coinsidence I said yah right 1 time in 35 years of filing my taxes and this particular year they just for no reason decided to hold it back with out a good reason or explanation . Okay SURE they did 😜 ... The deep state is very real !! IMHO . Edited February 4 by T master 1
sherpa Posted March 23 Posted March 23 52 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: It is always wise to not post stuff from other sources, who have no credibility, on matters one knows little about. This is one of those situations. Most everything posted by non informed individuals regarding the CIA is total conjecture and useless, but nonetheless, potentially dangerous. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted March 23 Author Posted March 23 (edited) 33 minutes ago, sherpa said: It is always wise to not post stuff from other sources, who have no credibility, on matters one knows little about. This is one of those situations. Most everything posted by non informed individuals regarding the CIA is total conjecture and useless, but nonetheless, potentially dangerous. Posting stuff from others who have their own opinions, just like everyone else here does not seem problematic to me any longer in 2025. I stopped giving a fuk.c about any of that when everyone and their brother suddenly became expert virologists, epidemiologist and vaccine formulation scientists in recent years. Follow The Science, remember? It's 2025 man. Everyone is an expert on everything all the time. Edited March 23 by BillsFanNC
B-Man Posted March 23 Posted March 23 Clueless Chuck Schumer Vows Not to Step Down, Trots Out Tired Old 'Democracy Is at Risk' Playbook Bob Hoge https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2025/03/23/clueless-chuck-schumer-vows-not-to-step-down-trots-out-tired-old-democracy-is-at-risk-playbook-n2186994 .
sherpa Posted March 23 Posted March 23 11 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Posting stuff from others who have their own opinions, just like everyone else here does not seem problematic to me any longer in 2025. I stopped giving a fuk.c about any of that when everyone and their brother suddenly became expert virologists, epidemiologist and vaccine formulation scientists in recent years. Follow The Science, remember? It's 2025 man. Everyone is an expert on everything all the time. I said this because I have seen it before. People who know nothing suggesting there is something afoot becasue they find nonsense from other sources. I'll provide two examples, which you may or may not be familiar with, or remember. Someone posted a suggestion that someone who was a friend of mine, and someone I am quite familiar with, was involved in a bribery issue. He was a three star, and taking over the Pacific Fleet, and some moron suggested there was bribery involved because of people who attended the change of command. Someone here posted all that trash with no knowledge of who gets invited to those things. It was nonsense. The individual is an extremely accomplished Naval Officer and there is zero evidence, anywhere of his being involved. Second. Some guy on here posted a theory that the US was about to get involved in some military action in the Pacific becasue a number of carriers were in the same location. He made a statement, which made no sense, of something like "when have we seen that before without some military action." I pointed out that carriers often switch coasts. Some are west and some are east, but for various reasons, they swap, deployment scheds etc. When they do, they may "pass in the night in common waters. Means nothing. That didn't prevent this guy, here, from getting up in arms about some imminent military action. Total nonsense.
BillsFanNC Posted March 23 Author Posted March 23 (edited) 16 minutes ago, sherpa said: I said this because I have seen it before. People who know nothing suggesting there is something afoot becasue they find nonsense from other sources. I'll provide two examples, which you may or may not be familiar with, or remember. Someone posted a suggestion that someone who was a friend of mine, and someone I am quite familiar with, was involved in a bribery issue. He was a three star, and taking over the Pacific Fleet, and some moron suggested there was bribery involved because of people who attended the change of command. Someone here posted all that trash with no knowledge of who gets invited to those things. It was nonsense. The individual is an extremely accomplished Naval Officer and there is zero evidence, anywhere of his being involved. Second. Some guy on here posted a theory that the US was about to get involved in some military action in the Pacific becasue a number of carriers were in the same location. He made a statement, which made no sense, of something like "when have we seen that before without some military action." I pointed out that carriers often switch coasts. Some are west and some are east, but for various reasons, they swap, deployment scheds etc. When they do, they may "pass in the night in common waters. Means nothing. That didn't prevent this guy, here, from getting up in arms about some imminent military action. Total nonsense. I hear you. Again, hearing all the "expert virologists" with wacky takes having zero basis in science and reality gives me understanding of the above. Still, I'm not sure how an elected sitting senator saying that unelected bureaucrats in the CIA (or IC at large) have "six ways from Sunday" at getting back at an elected President isn't sufficient grounds for questioning the CIA. It's the friggin CIA, by its very nature none of know for certain exactly what they're up to. Edited March 23 by BillsFanNC
Big Blitz Posted March 23 Posted March 23 Democracy…… …..communists talk a lot about “democracy.” People should really understand this about communism. Communists believe they’re democratic. Communists want to convince you this “loss” of democracy is your loss of freedom and liberties. Curious. Do you ever ever hear them say those 2 words? Nope. 1
sherpa Posted March 23 Posted March 23 (edited) 39 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: I hear you. Again, hearing all the "expert virologists" with wacky takes having zero basis in science and reality gives me understanding of the above. Still, I'm not sure how an elected sitting senator saying that unelected bureaucrats in the CIA (or IC at large) have "six ways from Sunday" at getting back at an elected President isn't sufficient grounds for questioning the CIA. It's the friggin CIA, by its very nature none of know for certain exactly what they're up to. I've got no problem with an anti Schumer vector to this. My view is using his idiocy to besmirch the CIA, and calling it a rogue agency, a claim made by some complete unknown is idiotic. We need to attract, recruit and retain the best people for that agency. Know what it's like to do that? Get in, which isn't easy. Train for a year to just get it figured out. Then train for a year in your specialty. If it's language, that's a year. Now you're two years in to get your first assignment. Got a spouse? You're moving. His or her career is upended, though they may make more money than you, and you are going to spend a ton of time away from home. Then after two years, move to a new assignment. Got kids now? That is the normal demographic. Uproot them for the new assignment. After a few years, get assigned to headquarters at Langley. Know how much it costs to buy a house in that area? Then after a couple years, get an assignment that does not allow you to bring family, though you kids are probably five-seven yeas old. Think that's an attractive career package? Anyway, all of that isn't the point. The point is that we have very dedicated people doing this and internet nonsense about them trying to overthrow the gov., by people who know absolutely nothing about this is not a good idea. Edited March 23 by sherpa
BillsFanNC Posted March 23 Author Posted March 23 1 hour ago, sherpa said: I've got no problem with an anti Schumer vector to this. My view is using his idiocy to besmirch the CIA, and calling it a rogue agency, a claim made by some complete unknown is idiotic. We need to attract, recruit and retain the best people for that agency. Know what it's like to do that? Get in, which isn't easy. Train for a year to just get it figured out. Then train for a year in your specialty. If it's language, that's a year. Now you're two years in to get your first assignment. Got a spouse? You're moving. His or her career is upended, though they may make more money than you, and you are going to spend a ton of time away from home. Then after two years, move to a new assignment. Got kids now? That is the normal demographic. Uproot them for the new assignment. After a few years, get assigned to headquarters at Langley. Know how much it costs to buy a house in that area? Then after a couple years, get an assignment that does not allow you to bring family, though you kids are probably five-seven yeas old. Think that's an attractive career package? Anyway, all of that isn't the point. The point is that we have very dedicated people doing this and internet nonsense about them trying to overthrow the gov., by people who know absolutely nothing about this is not a good idea. Same can be said about the FBI. Undoubtedly the majority of the people in the field and doing the daily grind at both the CIA and FBI are fine people and true patriots. The leadership at both have unquestionably gone completely off the rails.
sherpa Posted March 23 Posted March 23 7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Same can be said about the FBI. Undoubtedly the majority of the people in the field and doing the daily grind at both the CIA and FBI are fine people and true patriots. The leadership at both have unquestionably gone completely off the rails. I am getting really tired of this. If one wants to find people "off the rails," this would be low fruit, easy pickin' evidence.
Recommended Posts