phypon Posted May 31 Posted May 31 3 minutes ago, 4th&long said: I can't stand you as a poster, but I have to give it to you, that really is funny and made me laugh. Good one!
SCBills Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Depending on how the Supreme Court “Presidential Immunity” case goes, this moves to the front of the line for me. Indict Obama for murder and try him in a red federal district. 1 1
Scraps Posted May 31 Posted May 31 7 minutes ago, SCBills said: Depending on how the Supreme Court “Presidential Immunity” case goes, this moves to the front of the line for me. Indict Obama for murder and try him in a red federal district. Who did Obama murder in a red district?
4th&long Posted May 31 Posted May 31 (edited) 16 minutes ago, phypon said: I can't stand you as a poster, but I have to give it to you, that really is funny and made me laugh. Good one! Am I supposed to care that you don’t like me? Edited May 31 by 4th&long 2
ChiGoose Posted May 31 Posted May 31 15 minutes ago, SCBills said: Depending on how the Supreme Court “Presidential Immunity” case goes, this moves to the front of the line for me. Indict Obama for murder and try him in a red federal district. As deplorable as that drone strike was, I have a hard time believing that SCOTUS would rule in a way that it could be found to have been an unofficial act and therefore prosecutable.
The Frankish Reich Posted May 31 Posted May 31 5 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: As deplorable as that drone strike was I don't agree that it was deplorable. It was unfortunate that he could not reasonably be captured and tried, but given that, the action was justified.
phypon Posted May 31 Posted May 31 18 minutes ago, 4th&long said: Am I supposed to care that you don’t like me? I don't care that you don't care that I don't like you. This one is also funny. 1
ScotSHO Posted May 31 Posted May 31 21 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: As deplorable as that drone strike was, I have a hard time believing that SCOTUS would rule in a way that it could be found to have been an unofficial act and therefore prosecutable. I think we could get Truman for mass murder.
ChiGoose Posted May 31 Posted May 31 21 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: I think we could get Truman for mass murder. How so? Do you think dropping the bombs was an unofficial act?
4th&long Posted May 31 Posted May 31 27 minutes ago, phypon said: I don't care that you don't care that I don't like you. This one is also funny. That’s all I’ve been looking for. All you can do is laugh. I’m not going to gloat over this. I don’t think it is good for the country, this thing is only in the third inning. Trump is great at tieing things up in court. 1
ChiGoose Posted May 31 Posted May 31 37 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I don't agree that it was deplorable. It was unfortunate that he could not reasonably be captured and tried, but given that, the action was justified. Personally, I don’t like the state killing citizens, even if they are deserving of it. I get the justification, I think the strike was legal, I just personally don’t like it.
SCBills Posted May 31 Posted May 31 1 hour ago, Scraps said: Who did Obama murder in a red district? I literally linked the post. You could just read it ::shrugs::
ScotSHO Posted May 31 Posted May 31 33 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: How so? Do you think dropping the bombs was an unofficial act? It was a bit excessive. Can we get Bush for faking the Iraq war? 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 1 Posted June 1 4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: In L.A. and you find this action admirable? sums up the lack of decency among your tribe. 1
Big Blitz Posted June 1 Posted June 1 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: and you find this action admirable? sums up the lack of decency among your tribe. Ok boss
Joe Ferguson forever Posted June 1 Posted June 1 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Ok boss wow, not all D's are decent. what a revelation. the difference is that liberalism is not a movement overwhelmingly based on indecency.
Big Blitz Posted June 1 Posted June 1 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: wow, not all D's are decent. what a revelation. the difference is that liberalism is not a movement overwhelmingly based on indecency. In 2024 this “movement” says women can be men and 5 year old boys that say they like pink are definitely girls.
L Ron Burgundy Posted June 1 Posted June 1 17 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Ok boss Never heard of Philly have we?
Tenhigh Posted June 1 Posted June 1 7 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: And maybe now that it's over, we look not at the wisdom or propriety of the charges and trial, but to what he actually did: - almost undoubtedly (although he laughably denies it) had sex with a professional sex worker, right after his son's birth - worked with the most comically disreputable publication in America to plant false stories about his REPUBLICAN primary opponents (Ted Cruz's father with Oswald!) and to bury stories about his own affairs (Karen McDougal) and one-off hooker bangs (Stormy) - conspired with his toadies to mischaracterize those payoffs as legal fees on numerous official filings THAT is their hero. We'll get the "well Biden ... Hunter ... Ashley's diary! But come on, Biden is nobody's hero. He's just the alternative we've been handed. Yep, just a daughter-showering-with, child-sniffing, access-selling, plagiarizing, racist alternative.
Recommended Posts