Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

absolutely. many a legal scholar are critical of this NYC case. and all she did was ask the question


The legal scholars were not part of the jury.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:


The legal scholars were not part of the jury.

Huh? That's what legal scholars do. They live in courtrooms.

 

And she wasn't on the NYC jury, I agree

Edited by Pokebball
Posted
2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

The jurisdiction always matters.

The judge always matters.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

Or, commit the crime at a time in place where the outcome is predetermined. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Or, commit the crime at a time in place where the outcome is predetermined. 

 

Where the penal codes are scoured, novel legal theories are conjured up and taken for a spin on former Presidents

Posted
40 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I’m just glad Pride Month starts tomorrow. Let the healing begin!

 

It's might already be out there, but you just know that the "Trump guilty verdict is a blow to the anti LGBTQIA+XYZ movement" story has been in the can for weeks.

Posted

I am currently in Northern Jersey and have been driving around a bit over the past few days. Me and my wife have seen 2 Biden signs and dozens of Trump signs. This decision is going to push anyone who was on the fence to Trump and embolden his fans.

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So true, just like not many people say they supported Bush or his war 

 

 


just like suddenly you can’t find a democrat who supported the blm riots

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...