HappyDays Posted May 24 Posted May 24 8 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: well here it means adding to the group of pass catchers. We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not. But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL. 1 Quote
MikePJ76 Posted May 24 Posted May 24 8 minutes ago, HappyDays said: We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not. But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL. well I was talking about the original premise of next years offseason but to this statement I think their have been some excellent additions to the offense most importantly the atmosphere and who is looking up to who. But it appears your needle is going to continue to skip on Diggs, Diggs, Diggs. So great if that is what gets u through the offseason thats fine. Quote
Fan in San Diego Posted May 24 Posted May 24 I'm glad Beane shook it all up. It wasn't working! We had to try something different to get past Kansas City. I love all the changes. I think we are going to a west coast hybrid and Josh is perfectly capable of doing it. We don't need a high priced #1 WR to run it. 1 Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted May 24 Posted May 24 23 minutes ago, HappyDays said: We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not. But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL. If you replaced Diggs for mvs in our playoff loss we probably win 😂. The dude made a couple big contested catches. in all seriousness though idk why people are talking like we’ve gotta replace prime Diggs to upgrade what we had last year. Diggs was playing like a decent wr2 down the stretch. Could be he was mentally checked out and a change of scenery will help but I’m not so sure. He’s never had burner speed and seemed to get pretty unreliable with contested catches 1 Quote
Pete Posted May 24 Posted May 24 To all the whiners about the Bills WRs in 24 Hardy 15 for 150 Sherfield 11 catches for 86 yards in 2023. Gabe 45 for 746 Diggs week 5 on- 26, 87, 49, 28, 24, 27, 34, 74, 36, 84, 70, 58 wah! Wah! wah! Diggs numbers after week 5 were weak. Coleman will have better games. As will Shakir. Do people think we did not upgrade Hardy? Lmao Does losing Sherfield upset you? arent you sick of Gabe dropping passes? Keon, Shakir, Mack, Dalton catch everything thrown their way. keep crying 2 1 Quote
GoBills808 Posted May 24 Posted May 24 1 hour ago, HappyDays said: We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not. But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL. objectively correct We we actually have is a borderline top10 TE, a borderline top 5ish RB, and a WR room comprised entirely of guys who in their combined NFL careers have never cracked 875 yards/season which for reference would have been good for the 44th ranked wideout by yards last year. so there's optimism and then there's reality...let's not confuse the two 1 2 Quote
L Ron Burgundy Posted May 24 Posted May 24 1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said: He is on acid. The only way this is true is if Claypool snaps out of whatever the F has been afflicting him his career, Samuel becomes a stud, Khalil becomes a solid 2, and 1 of 2 rookies ball out immediately. It's not all happening but it would be amazing. Quote
Chaos Posted May 24 Posted May 24 before this news did anyone think the bills were finishing outside the top 10 teams? Quote
McBean Posted May 24 Posted May 24 I agree. Best weapons in the league. Best roster in the league. Best coaches in the league. This is OUR year! 1 hour ago, Success said: After getting SB hyped every season, I truly love going into this season w/ the general consensus being "they lost Diggs and a bunch of guys - they're taking a step back." Health is the key - but this team has as good a chance at the title as we've seen in the JA era. I love this team. Agreed! Don't want too much pressure. It's never a great thing. That's why no teams can continue to contend year after year for AFC title games and Super Bowls! 1 Quote
ganesh Posted May 25 Posted May 25 8 hours ago, Logic said: For what it's worth (probably not much): My personal opinion is that the Bills would be JUST on the outside looking in of the "top five in the AFC" discussion. In no particular order, I'd list the Texans, Chiefs, Dolphins, Bengals, Titans, and arguably the Jaguars as having better weapons than the Bills. So I'd probably have the Bills sixth or seventh. A big jump from Kincaid and Shakir could change that, but that's where I'd have it now. Disrespect to the reigning Super Bowl champion ? 1 hour ago, McBean said: I agree. Best weapons in the league. Best roster in the league. Best coaches in the league. I was with you until you typed that!!! Go Bills ! 1 Quote
Blackbeard Posted May 25 Posted May 25 Buffalo has THE best offensive weapon in the AFC, if not the entire league in Allen. prove me wrong. 1 2 Quote
The 9 Isles Posted May 25 Posted May 25 Watching Josh Allen when he had John Brown and Cole Beasley was fun. 1 Quote
DapperCam Posted May 25 Posted May 25 (edited) Top 5 in the AFC? It's an interesting thought experiment. If I could swap WR, TE, and RB with the following teams then I would (considering only talent, not cap hits). 1. Miami 2. Cincinnati 3. Browns (especially if Chubb is still good after injury) 4. Texans Teams where I think it's basically equal: 1. Baltimore 2. Colts 3. Chiefs 4. Jets (they could be in the next group up, it's close) So I guess if someone put us at the very top of that second group we would be top 5. Not sure I agree though. Edited May 25 by DapperCam Quote
DeepPass Posted May 25 Posted May 25 9 hours ago, Logic said: For what it's worth (probably not much): My personal opinion is that the Bills would be JUST on the outside looking in of the "top five in the AFC" discussion. In no particular order, I'd list the Texans, Chiefs, Dolphins, Bengals, Titans, and arguably the Jaguars as having better weapons than the Bills. So I'd probably have the Bills sixth or seventh. A big jump from Kincaid and Shakir could change that, but that's where I'd have it now. No, No, No! Quote
CNYfan Posted May 25 Posted May 25 4 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said: He is on acid. Which I consider a good thing 1 1 Quote
Pete Posted May 25 Posted May 25 30 minutes ago, DapperCam said: Top 5 in the AFC? It's an interesting thought experiment. If I could swap WR, TE, and RB with the following teams then I would (considering only talent, not cap hits). 1. Miami 2. Cincinnati 3. Browns (especially if Chubb is still good after injury) 4. Texans Teams where I think it's basically equal: 1. Baltimore 2. Colts 3. Chiefs 4. Jets (they could be in the next group up, it's close) So I guess if someone put us at the very top of that second group we would be top 5. Not sure I agree though. Texans? Diggs and Singletary? I’m taking Bills skill positions over Houston Quote
DapperCam Posted May 25 Posted May 25 3 minutes ago, Pete said: Texans? Diggs and Singletary? I’m taking Bills skill positions over Houston You obviously missed Nico Collins and Tank Dell last year. Big reason why Stroud had a great rookie season. 1 Quote
NewEra Posted May 25 Posted May 25 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Pete said: Texans? Diggs and Singletary? I’m taking Bills skill positions over Houston Collins, Diggs, Mixon, Dell, Schultz I’d easily take the Texans WRs over ours, but I prefer our TEs and RBs Edited May 25 by NewEra Quote
GoBills808 Posted May 25 Posted May 25 1 minute ago, DapperCam said: You obviously missed Nico Collins and Tank Dell last year. Big reason why Stroud had a great rookie season. Yeah they'd both start here imo 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.