Doc Posted Tuesday at 10:34 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:34 PM 5 minutes ago, Motorin' said: It's not just that there's no evidence it came from a wet market. It's that highly infectious viruses spread across large segments of a species before jumping to other species. And that jump happens across the population. Not at one specific spot, or in one specific animal. If CV 19 had a natural origin it would have been found in bats across China. And it would have mutated and jumped to humans across China. The fact that there was one hot spot for human transmission, within blocks of the Wuhan novel Corona Virus lab, and that no bats have been found across China with CV 19, is a smoking gun that it leaked from the lab. Combined with the clear signs of human manipulation of the spike protein / furin cleavage site, means that any virologist rejecting the lab leak theory is lying at the behest of Tony Fauci, who commanded that the lab leak theory be rejected... I cannot wait for the trials to begin. Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are going to be busy! Lots of Dr. Quack tears will be shed. It's funny to hear the "doctor" on the board talking about scientific methods and then believe Wuhan virus came from a wet market without a single piece of evidence. Meanwhile a lab in the same city is studying the exact same virus and they're like "on no, it couldn't have come from there!" Like I said, everyone has an agenda. They reject the lab leak because it implicates Teflon Tony. 1 1 1
Motorin' Posted Tuesday at 10:39 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:39 PM 4 minutes ago, Doc said: It's funny to hear the "doctor" on the board talking about scientific methods and then believe Wuhan virus came from a wet market without a single piece of evidence. Meanwhile a lab in the same city is studying the exact same virus and they're like "on no, it couldn't have come from there!" Like I said, everyone has an agenda. They reject the lab leak because it implicates Teflon Tony. His evidence is "because virologists say so," including the virologists implicated in gain of function research at Wuhan. 1 1
Doc Posted Tuesday at 10:41 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:41 PM Just now, Motorin' said: His evidence is "because virologists say so," including the virologists implicated in gain of function research at Wuhan. The default explanation was the lab. Unless/until an animal is discovered, it will remain the explanation. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted Wednesday at 01:41 AM Author Posted Wednesday at 01:41 AM 2 hours ago, Motorin' said: His evidence is "because virologists say so," including the virologists implicated in gain of function research at Wuhan. And some of those very same virologists, in their private communications, stated that the lab origin theory was indeed very likely while authoring papers that said the opposite. Integrity and credibility. Reliable even! 1 1 1
JFKjr Posted Wednesday at 12:54 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:54 PM They engineered the bird flu virus also. Not that the flocks are dropping dead. they're being culled based on (once again) flawed PCR tests. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted Wednesday at 01:03 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:03 PM 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: It's easy to get scientists to publicly reject the lab origin conclusion when they're handsomely compensated to believe something else while making it quite clear that expressing an opinion supporting the lab origin theory can result in both personal consequences. 3
Recommended Posts