Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:

 

Billfuk.c doubling down on idiotic hoaxes?

 

Water is wet.

 

 

 

Everything is a hoax when it is inconvenient...

 

Yes, please, quote Newsmax for us... Julie is pissed.

 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Because it makes Trump one of the people, when the Left only wants people to see Trump as a white supremacist…

 

They mad because it hurts their messaging…👍

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Yep.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9536ba4eedaf7feac19fd39e9915b859.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.ace3454c2e6f7b6574b47eb113b128e5.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.eeacb315ba0e327c317b7566852da21f.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.67f6c81131992f4c1215a1101129f076.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.83e723c4a9bdf4ef836741406661d341.jpeg

Maga is just a bunch of white trash. At least they got out of the trailer park.

3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

That’s definitely an improvement from trump. And a step up from his usual supporters!

Edited by 4th&long
Posted
3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Because it makes Trump one of the people, when the Left only wants people to see Trump as a white supremacist…

 

They mad because it hurts their messaging…👍


AI generated images makes Trump relatable and sincere?

 

giphy.gif?cid=9b38fe919fc86da91573991f05

 

Dems don’t have to worry about messaging when Trump does all the dirty work for them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
On 5/25/2024 at 5:39 PM, JaCrispy said:

Because it makes Trump one of the people, when the Left only wants people to see Trump as a white supremacist…

 

They mad because it hurts their messaging…👍

Most of us don't think he's a white supremacist.   Just a literal reetard.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

Of course they do.

Dig deeper and you'll see how conflicted Americans are on this.

Ask "should asylum seekers have the right to a hearing to see if they qualify to stay" and most people will say yes.

So that portion of people in the country illegally would be exempt.

 

I'm not arguing with this poll. This strikes me as accurate. What I'm saying is that this is how we got in this situation - at some point, the right to a full hearing conflicts with the desire to deter illegal immigration. Things like "build the wall" or "Illegal immigration benefits us" do nothing to advance a coherent policy agenda.

(Insults will be relegated to that other thread)

Posted
1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Of course they do.

Dig deeper and you'll see how conflicted Americans are on this.

Ask "should asylum seekers have the right to a hearing to see if they qualify to stay" and most people will say yes.

So that portion of people in the country illegally would be exempt.

 

I'm not arguing with this poll. This strikes me as accurate. What I'm saying is that this is how we got in this situation - at some point, the right to a full hearing conflicts with the desire to deter illegal immigration. Things like "build the wall" or "Illegal immigration benefits us" do nothing to advance a coherent policy agenda.

(Insults will be relegated to that other thread)

I don't disagree totally.  

 

But even CNN is reporting people are gaming the asylum process by claiming it after they are cought.

 

Largest cities in the nation won't call ice when when an actual criminal act takes place.  

 

The new libertarian guy for president supports open immigration.  But believes it should go through Ellis Island style port of call (even though that divergences from the UN regs)

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...