GASabresIUFan Posted April 27 Author Share Posted April 27 6 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: And that 11 to 9 doesn't include the 1st traded away for Diggs, correct? So, it's actually 11 to 10. Correct! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCAS Baritone Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 I think we are looking at special teamers. We've had one of the more expensive special teams group for a while, and that would be an easy place to get younger and cheaper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted April 27 Author Share Posted April 27 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: By cutting Diggs and not adequately addressing WR we are a worse team now than the one that barely won the divison and lost in the playoffs. I'm sorry, but I'm not at all sad that we traded Diggs. I think Kincaid and Shakir with Samuel and now Coleman will make up a better group of pass catchers then we had last season as Diggs' 160 targets get spread around better as Josh won't have to feed a Prima Donna, but instead focus on throwing to who is actually open. Here are some stats after week 6 when we opened up the offense and started using Kincaid and Shakir more. (Stats include the playoffs) Diggs - 111 tgts, 68 rec, 636 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 61.26, yards/att 5.73 Kincaid - 83 tgts, 64 rec, 659 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 77.11%, yards/att 7.94 Shakir - 52 tgts, 45 rec, 646 yards, 3 TDS, Catch % 86.54%, yards/att 12.42 Which of these players would you keep if you were the GM? The player on the downside of his career or the kuds who were just as productive but have upside? Also add that Diggs only had 19 explosive plays on 160 targets, while Shakir had 17 on 45 targets in the regular season. Also combine comparison between Shakir and Diggs (both were 5th rd picks) Shakir - 6' 196, 4.43 40, 1.49 10 yard split, 34.5 vertical - 78 Athleticism score Diggs - 6' 195, 4.46 40, 1.53 10 yard split, 35 vertical - 69 Athleticism score Edited April 27 by GASabresIUFan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 TJ Tampa coming up if he is still there... NFL Comparison Rasul Douglas and zone heavy CB. https://www.nfl.com/prospects/t.j.-tampa/32005441-4d52-3098-6c60-07c674275129 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted April 27 Author Share Posted April 27 Just now, Big Turk said: TJ Tampa coming up if he is still there... NFL Comparison Rasul Douglas and zone heavy CB. https://www.nfl.com/prospects/t.j.-tampa/32005441-4d52-3098-6c60-07c674275129 Espn compared him to Elam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 1 minute ago, GASabresIUFan said: Espn compared him to Elam. He is not fast enough to be a man coverage player in the NFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 If there's a center out there that looks like he could develop into a starter, I think the Bills will take him. Note -- I just typed that and then saw they drafted a center. That name of his though -- doesn't sound like someone who likes to get muddy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Ray Davis's real name is Re’Mahn Walter Zhamar Jamar Davis. The center we drafted is named Sedrick Van Pan-Granger. The center's jersey will probably be wide enough for all the letters but the RB will probably have to use two lines if he wants it all there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.