DJB Posted April 27 Posted April 27 So happy Kneeland was picked. We were rumoured and I didn’t want him 3 5 Quote
SCBills Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, Ralonzo said: Franklin at 60 wouldn't be a good use of assets. They decided on a guy already, their top-3 are set. They can grab a project day 3 (Flournoy, C Johnson, Means) WR3’s are getting PAID in the NFL. We still don’t have a down the field threat. We were down to Diggs, Shakir and Sherfield in the biggest games of the year last season. 2 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, Ralonzo said: Franklin at 60 wouldn't be a good use of assets. They decided on a guy already, their top-3 are set. They can grab a project day 3 (Flournoy, C Johnson, Means) I do like Flournoy in the 4th or 5th. A small school guy they can play on STs year 1 while developing him 2 Quote
PayDaBill$ Posted April 27 Posted April 27 (edited) Bullard, Hicks or maybe Franklin. Edited April 27 by PayDaBill$ 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, PayDaBill$ said: Hicks? Love hicks. This feels early though Quote
MikePJ76 Posted April 27 Posted April 27 jaden hicks seems like a guy buffalo would want but also GB will want. Quote
Ralonzo Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, PayDaBill$ said: Hicks? Hicks would be outstanding for value and need. 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, MrEpsYtown said: Love hicks. This feels early though Slightly, I agree. But he is a perfect fit in this D IMO. 1 Quote
B-Man Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, Ralonzo said: Hicks would be outstanding for value and need. or Bullard. Quote
Brandon Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, SCBills said: WR3’s are getting PAID in the NFL. We still don’t have a down the field threat. We were down to Diggs, Shakir and Sherfield in the biggest games of the year last season. They need to have some quality competition for the slot/flanker spots anyway. And this isn't really a great spot for anything else in this draft. May as well get a burner who can take the top off the defense. I think he can be more than that, too. Quote
Warcodered Posted April 27 Posted April 27 1 minute ago, Ralonzo said: Franklin at 60 wouldn't be a good use of assets. They decided on a guy already, their top-3 are set. They can grab a project day 3 (Flournoy, C Johnson, Means) You have more than 3 WRs on the game day roster, having more versatility is a good thing. 2 Quote
QLBillsFan Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, B-Man said: or Bullard. Yes or Bishop .. do they go WR again ??? Quote
In Summary Posted April 27 Posted April 27 I think the Bills don't take another receiver until the 4th round. 2 Quote
Whkfc Posted April 27 Posted April 27 3 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said: Bullard, Hicks or maybe Franklin. Bullard gone Quote
Ralonzo Posted April 27 Posted April 27 Just now, MrEpsYtown said: Love hicks. This feels early though He's a 2nd round grade but it's a devalued position. Still, it's a long long way to 95. Do you take a move down? 60 + 144 for 70 + 107 with NYG is a proper value. Quote
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted April 27 Posted April 27 7 minutes ago, Green Lightning said: Franklin at 60 or OL or D? 5 minutes ago, Goin Breakdown said: Franklin please for me You want another WR?? Total waste. Rookies need more time to develop working with them and trying to develop 2 rookies drafted high at same position is just a waste. They will both suffer as a result. Works great in fantasy Football, but not in the NFL 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.