Bills interested in Deebo Samuel per Mike Giardi

[Warriorspikes51]

Just now, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

I am open to this depending on compensation (you aren't getting any of my next 4 picks this season)... and I would still want to get a WR at 33.  

 

Truthfully this guy is one of my favorite players to watch in the league, and he'd be an absolutely lethal player in this offense.  I think Brady/McD/Beane know this so you have to consider it if you can make the math work.  Doing it means Shakir is probably playing a bit more boundary, and other Samuel is probably used a bit differently.  

No it doesn’t? Deebo is not a slot WR

[MasterStrategist]

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

No.  If we keep 33 take a WR regardless of acquired player

I've asked you this before (for other trades you've brought up), but when you're not dreaming/fantasizing about trades and back to reality....

 

How do we fit Deebos cap hit under our current situation?  Unless 49ers convert almost all of his $20m salary to bonus (hence they eat more dead cap), it's just not possible as I see.it.  On top of that, if 49ers ate more dead cap, it will likely take more than pick 33 to get him.

 

I'll let you explain now.

[Bleeding Bills Blue]

Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:

No it doesn’t? Deebo is not a slot WR

 

We got other samuel too.  Some samuel can play in the slot 🙂 

[3rdand12]

15 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Aiyuk is more likely IMO

So neither of them , really

[Mango]

6 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Mr Cover 1 Greg T has been wrong several times.  He beat it to death that it was “IMPOSSIBLE” to move Diggs

 

so I absolutely expect us to acquire a vet WR now

 

I think their coverage reviews got so big so quickly they feel this pressure to be constantly pushing out content.

 

Their content was so "information" based as in just breaking down the general responsibilities of certain coverages and basic reads that when they give an opinion or thought it has this weight of "reporting". Which leads to this "well Cover 1 says..." but they don't have the knowledge or inside line to support that kind of regular content creation. 

 

[stlbills13]

I think you should be able to get Deebo for relatively cheap in terms of trade compensation. You can always make it work cap wise. I do think your WR room gets a little redundant but Deebo is good and you'd still be drafting a WR tonight in my opinion. I'd rather have Aiyuk but I would assume the 49ers would rather have him too

[Warriorspikes51]

Just now, stlbills13 said:

I think you should be able to get Deebo for relatively cheap in terms of trade compensation. You can always make it work cap wise. I do think your WR room gets a little redundant but Deebo is good and you'd still be drafting a WR tonight in my opinion. I'd rather have Aiyuk but I would assume the 49ers would rather have him too

I’d give a 3 and 5 for Deebo and take AD at 33 or trade down again

[dma0034]

As a few have said: I just don't see if it a cap standpoint. I think the Bills pick Mitchell and another WR in the 2nd or 3rd. 

[BullBuchanan]

18 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

The days of free agent wide receivers are over. This is silly. They really want to trade a valuable pick AND pay a guy a boatload of money?

They days of FA WRs are clearly in their prime, in case you haven't noticed.

[Process]

Over 900 yards receiving one time in his career 

[Warriorspikes51]

Just now, dma0034 said:

As a few have said: I just don't see if it a cap standpoint. I think the Bills pick Mitchell and another WR in the 2nd or 3rd. 

whether you see it or not, a legit league reporter has stated we have interest.

 

obviously, the Bills know much more than all the so called cap experts on here and on X

 

 

[dma0034]

Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:

I’d give a 3 and 5 for Deebo and take AD at 33 or trade down again

 

That would be a hell of a deal for Beane. Trade down and collect the picks to trade for Deebo all the while you really only moved down 5 spots. Turning the 28th pick into Deebo and Mitchell would be exceptional

[BillsFanJ]

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

I’d give a 3 and 5 for Deebo and take AD at 33 or trade down again

 

Not my preference with the pick, but I wouldn't be mad about it at all.

[dma0034]

Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:

whether you see it or not, a legit league reporter has stated we have interest.

 

obviously, the Bills know much more than all the so called cap experts on here and on X

 

 

 

Fair enough. Obviously Beane has way more knowledge than I ever will with cap space

[NoSaint]

9 minutes ago, BillsFanJ said:

 

Nah, you take DeJean.  Big need at that position, and there's no one better available. 

At which position?!?

[ToGoGo]

10 minutes ago, BillsFanJ said:

Getting Deebo Samuel would be a homerun for this team.  If they can keep the 33rd pick to draft DeJean and also get Deebo -- wowza!!

Yeah whenever I read fans talk about top players with stuff like “hard pass” and “meh” all I can think about were fans saying the same thing about Randy Moss when the Pats got him from Oakland. “They can have him!”  
 

There’s a reason you buy low and sell high. It’s because the masses buy high and sell low. 

[zow2]

20 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

Trading for Deebo = 0%

Trading for Aiyuk = 25%

Drafting Franklin or Mitchell = 75%

 

I’m in on Aiyuk and Mitchell,  totally out on Franklin. 

[appoo]

Can someone please help me understand why you'd want any rookie this side of MHJ (the most ready made rookie WR we've seen other than JJ & Chase since like Julio Jones/AJ Green), over DEEBO FREAKIN SAMUEL?!!

[0017]

Getting Deebo on a Friday would be so poetic 😂, but I hope it doesn’t happen. 

[MasterStrategist]

4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

whether you see it or not, a legit league reporter has stated we have interest.

 

obviously, the Bills know much more than all the so called cap experts on here and on X

 

 

You're incorrect about the NFL cap rule....

 

sorry pal, even if we're interested or not