Eastport bills Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 hours ago, 947 said: We already signed Deebo-lite in Samuel, this makes no sense. Aiyuk is the 49ers WR we should be interested in. Deebo’s the biggest game changing weapon in football. He makes us markedly more dangerous and is the perfect complement to our receiving corp and RBs. Question is how does Beane fit him under the cap? Quote
BADOLBILZ Posted April 26 Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said: Well, if it's for a pick this year, he better be restructuring right now because 7 pm is fast approaching. Something tells me that's not on his plate right now. Anyway, if there was any team that would do it (and I don't think they will), it should be NE, a receiver-less team with $53.7 million in cap space. It's paperwork and likely already prepared ahead if the possibility of a trade for a vet had been considered(which it likely has). For all we know everything could be done and agreed to. Quote
H2o Posted April 26 Posted April 26 This is all smoke and mirrors. The cap hit for Deebo would be almost $43M and SF only has $6M open right now. A Deebo trade would jump his cap hit by $16M. 1 1 Quote
njbuff Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Just now, H2o said: This is all smoke and mirrors. The cap hit for Deebo would be almost $43M and SF only has $6M open right now. A Deebo trade would jump his cap hit by $16M. You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was. Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already? LMAO Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol. 2 minutes ago, njbuff said: You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was. Diggs trade only increased his cap hit $3M...thats a BIG difference in the $16M it jumps SF cap hit. 2 2 Quote
njbuff Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said: How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already? LMAO Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol. The Zach Ertz thread needs to challenged. 😁 1 Quote
hondo in seattle Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Given our cap situation, Beane needs to get some playmakers on rookie contracts. Quote
FireChans Posted April 26 Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: How on Earth is this nonsense 10 pages already? LMAO Guess y'all didn't learn your lesson in yesterday's like 80 pager on how we are gonna make a big move up in the draft nonsense lol. Diggs trade only increased his cap hit $3M...thats a BIG difference in the $16M it jumps SF cap hit. It doesn’t. It frees up 6M Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, Eastport bills said: Deebo’s the biggest game changing weapon in football. He makes us markedly more dangerous and is the perfect complement to our receiving corp and RBs. Question is how does Beane fit him under the cap? Wow, that is quite the over exaggeration there. He is a nice weapon, especially after the catch. But he is not a great deep ball WR, he doesn't have the best hands, and Brandon Aiyuk is by far the better actual WR on that team. Deebo makes up for what he lacks as a pure WR in his YAC and his versatility as a runner. He also has injury issues. But the issue is that we have Samuel, Shakir, and Kincaid who are all going to attack from the slot and the short to medium areas of the field. That is Deebo's sweet spot, so I don't know he is such a great fit for us. We need a true boundary WR who can attack all 3 phases of the field more than another short area attack weapon. Quote
nedboy7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, njbuff said: You're probably right, but we heard the same things about Diggs not being able to be traded, yet he was. No one really said that. They said it would be idiotic. Which might be true. 1 Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, FireChans said: It doesn’t. It frees up 6M Not what it says above...says it jumps his cap hit by $16M. I didn't look into it, just trusting what I am reading in this thread. Quote
Logic Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, FireChans said: It doesn’t. It frees up 6M Still waiting to hear how the Bills do it. What's the plan? Quote
Bills!Win! Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Wouldn’t it be weird having two players at the same position with the same last name? Quote
FireChans Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: Not what it says above...says it jumps his cap hit by $16M. I didn't look into it, just trusting what I am reading in this thread. They are wrong. Spotrac has it saving them money if they trade him. Why would you trust anything on here? Edited April 26 by FireChans Quote
yall Posted April 26 Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said: Wouldn’t it be weird having two players at the same position with the same last name? Like the season we had nine guys on the roster named "Williams"? Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 1 minute ago, FireChans said: They are wrong. Spotrac has it saving them money if they trade him. Why would you trust anything on here? Because I don't care to invest time to look into something that has almost no chance of happening. Quote
CaptnCoke11 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, Logic said: Still waiting to hear how the Bills do it. What's the plan? Maybe they would hope the NFL won’t notice Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.