BigDingus Posted April 26 Posted April 26 Hasn't it been pretty evident that the more "armor" they give these guys, the more reckless they play? I bet if they took helmets off of people entirely, there would be way less people willing to launch themselves head first into other players or lower their head/shoulder to truck a defender. 1 1 Quote
BuffaloBillsGospel2014 Posted April 26 Posted April 26 (edited) Live look in at Bills training camp Edited April 26 by BuffaloBillsGospel2014 1 Quote
Brand J Posted April 26 Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, BigDingus said: Hasn't it been pretty evident that the more "armor" they give these guys, the more reckless they play? I bet if they took helmets off of people entirely, there would be way less people willing to launch themselves head first into other players or lower their head/shoulder to truck a defender. They’ve been making this argument for years. The thought is that less protection equals less injuries because there’s less recklessness. I don’t follow rugby at all, but it’d be interesting to compare the injury stats since that’s also a contact sport. Also, this soft outer shell completely hides helmet colors and logos, so they’ll need to be colored according to team. Last thing we want is players (ie Quarterbacks) getting their targets confused. Quote
Malazan Posted April 27 Posted April 27 2 hours ago, Warcodered said: Nice of him to speak for everyone else. CTE is real. 2 1 Quote
ProcessImproverMan Posted April 27 Posted April 27 No issues with this. If it keeps one of our guys on the field longer, huge win. Quote
leonbus23 Posted April 27 Posted April 27 4 hours ago, Low Positive said: This thread should be a lot of fun. What's the o/u on the number of posts until someone makes a comment on kids getting participation trophies? What about "pretty soon, it'll be flag football?" How about "they might as well be playing in pantyhose?" It's a giant hidden global communist conspiracy! Quote
letsgoteam Posted April 27 Posted April 27 I'm sure technology/innovation will also make it where at some point the guarding caps will incorporate the logo, etc. Much like how they make sublimated jerseys. 1 Quote
ChevyVanMiller Posted April 27 Posted April 27 (edited) I wonder if they’ll make them in each team’s colors and replicate the logos on the sides? Edited April 27 by ChevyVanMiller 2 Quote
Mango Posted April 27 Posted April 27 5 hours ago, RiotAct said: Mark Kelso has (re-)entered the chat!!! But he isn’t sure if he’s here. Quote
Billznut Posted April 27 Posted April 27 (edited) The NFL cared so much about teams not having alternate helmets until just a few weeks ago and now we see why. A lot of players helmets will just be covered up now, so the league being nit-picky about teams having alternate logo helmets no longer seems so important. Edited April 27 by Billznut 1 Quote
HerdMentality Posted April 27 Posted April 27 4 hours ago, co_springs_billsfan said: So we've got padding inside the helmets, then the hard shell, then the guardian caps added padding outside the hard shell. How about we add another hard shell to these so it can fully be a helmet inside a helmet? Is two helmets even enough? Maybe three would be safer... Personally, I love the double-decker taco at Taco Bell. 1 Quote
Mikie2times Posted April 27 Posted April 27 It would be a disadvantage to have more weight on your helmet. Players already know. I doubt we see it form many. Quote
co_springs_billsfan Posted April 27 Posted April 27 10 minutes ago, HerdMentality said: Personally, I love the double-decker taco at Taco Bell. I have a friend that always gets the double deckaroni pizza at old chicago 1 Quote
Lost Posted April 27 Posted April 27 4 hours ago, co_springs_billsfan said: So we've got padding inside the helmets, then the hard shell, then the guardian caps added padding outside the hard shell. How about we add another hard shell to these so it can fully be a helmet inside a helmet? Is two helmets even enough? Maybe three would be safer... I got u covered. 1 1 1 Quote
Jerome007 Posted April 27 Posted April 27 With this, the major kickoff changes, going to 17 and probably 18 games... it's like a new game. Most of the previous records will be meaningless. No one comes close to popularity of the NFL in the US. Why trying to fix something that isn't broken? Though I liked the padded helmets for practices, the limitation of practices overall and of padded contact practices, making players come off for a concussion tests, and many other changes. This seems overkill. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.